Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Clipperton
Similar complaint to my one about the Australian team but is it really possible that england dont have better players than this? Surely this is in some parts a selection debacle.
Number 4 batsmen is a 33 year old with a first class average of 36.
Number 5 batsmen has a first class average of 34 and yes he's a handy bowler and would be an excellent number 7/8.
Number 7 specialist batsmen with a first class average of 32 lol
Repeating myself - Gary Ballance is a literal number 3 averages 48 in FC including 54 this year, 37 in tests. Why is he considered a worse option than Denly? Ollie Pope is 21 and has 2,000 first class runs at 60. Why isn't he in the side?
Burns
???
Ballance
Root
Pope
Bairstow
Stokes
Woakes
Archer
Broad
Jimmy
If Moeen was in better form, he's opened for England before, so I'd shove him in accepting he's not a test quality opener but we don't have good alternatives, he won't be facing Lyon (right?) and bowls good spin.