Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th)

07-26-2017 , 08:40 PM
Comparing someone who does something as a secondary sport vs someone who does it as their main focus is completely unfair.

A somewhat embarrassing personal example....I attended a beginner's muy thai class a few years ago. I had a very strong core at the time, would guess I was squatting around ~360 and deadlifting around ~450. The class was full of mediocre athletes(but who had been to this class many times before). We did a bunch of high-rep ab work in warmups, and I was the only one in the class who couldn't finish(my abs started cramping up).

People who regularly train a specific movement are going to be way better than those who only train it occasionally, even if the latter group is in way better overall shape.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 08:45 PM
And according to that reddit (lol) thread you linked to, Diaz's most impressive trialthon is the XTERRA TAHOE 2012. Some quick googling shows that Diaz finished 25th, with a time of 3:06:19. Somehow this was first in his age group, which I guess is like 21-29, as quite remarkably none of the 24 ahead of him was in his twenties.

Diaz finished nearly a half hour behind the winner, a 15 year old boy (lol). He got beat by 19 seconds by a 59 year old man, and finished 3 minutes behind a 31 year old woman. And six minutes behind a 39 year old woman. And 9 minutes behind a 31 year old woman. And 16 minutes behind a 49 year old man.

ELITE CARDIO

http://www.adventuresportsweektahoe....-overall12.pdf

Last edited by SenorKeeed; 07-26-2017 at 08:52 PM.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
And according to that reddit (lol) thread you linked to, Diaz's most impressive trialthon is the XTERRA TAHOE 2012. Some quick googling shows that Diaz finished 25th, with a time of 3:06:19. Somehow this was first in his age group, which I guess is like 21-29, as quite remarkably none of the 24 ahead of him was in his twenties.

Diaz finished nearly a half hour behind the winner, a 15 year old boy (lol). He got beat by 19 seconds by a 59 year old man, and finished 3 minutes behind a 31 year old woman. And six minutes behind a 39 year old woman. And 9 minutes behind a 31 year old woman. And 16 minutes behind a 49 year old man.

ELITE CARDIO

http://www.adventuresportsweektahoe....-overall12.pdf

This random old guy made 5221 free throws in a row:




Would you say that Steph Curry isn't an elite free throw shooter because he can't come close to matching that guy?
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
The fact you picked out that quote shows you don't watch mma or know who the diaz bros are, has nothing to do with their performance in the mma cage why i even made that statement. In their off season these guys do triathlons at a high level, these guys swim across alcatraz for fun, their kinda on a another level when it comes to cardio.
I'd take Lomochenko's fitness vs. either Diaz and give you odds.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
This random old guy made 5221 free throws in a row:




Would you say that Steph Curry isn't an elite free throw shooter because he can't come close to matching that guy?
no, I would say that Nick Diaz's best trialthalon is pretty unimpressive as he lost by a half hour to a 15 year old boy
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:25 PM
I'm pretty sure Usain Bolt gets torched in all the long distance competitions.

It very well could be significant that an athlete that competes in an event whose adherents typically have a significant amount of fast twitch muscle fiber, can also compete in this polar opposite freak marathon physique event at a decent level.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:26 PM
Im gonna need to see some video so i can judge the Nates swimming technique.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:27 PM
Of course, I wouldn't expect some rando MMA guy to be good at triathalons. Just pointing out that that Nick Diaz guy isn't, in fact, any good at triathalons.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:37 PM
He's decent.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:39 PM
Distance athletes look as if they could have walked off the spaceship in close encounters of the 3rd kind. It's not necessarily noteworthy if he lost to a few 40 year olds.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:40 PM
and a 59 year old.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:54 PM
His last triathlon he posted the exact same time as a 49 year old woman. Boxers can't match it bro.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 09:55 PM
btw none of those people are pro or even semi-pro athletes
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
I agree this fight is unique and we shouldn't necessarily use past examples to try to predict it. But I think the uniqueness of this fight adds to the intrigue(as evidenced by how well it is trending so far).

My main point is that the level of interest only increases when the underdog wins in unconvincing fashion. I think this view is backed both by intuitive thought and past data.
I agree completely with the bolded, but that's the problem. A unique thing gets a lot less unique when there's more than one of it. Some might even say it's not unique at all.

This event is a circus, and serious fans of either sport don't take it seriously. It's a freak show fight and it's attracting ****loads of casuals. Once it's been decided, the new-ness factor is gone and a repeat is a lot less interesting unless it's a controversial finish (i.e. Conor gets DQ'ed because of an elbow)


Quote:
I know incredibly little about boxing, so my views here aren't gonna be very insightful....

I have absolutely no clue who "Berto" is. I've heard of Roberto Duran so I'm guessing thats who it is. Regardless I assume his lack of name recognition among casuals like myself is why it sold poorly. I wouldn't recognize Roberto Duran if he walked right by me.

Floyd/Manny probably did well because casuals like me viewed it as the biggest boxing matchup in the world, and theres always some intrigue when you can hype something as "the biggest fight ever".

Berto is Andre Berto, former WBC Welterweight champion (and Wesley Snipes lookalike). He's a fine boxer, but he was no threat to beat Floyd when Floyd chose him to be his 49th and then-final fight.

Manny is one of the best boxers of all time and was one-half of the "fight we had to see" for nearly 5 years when Floyd chose him to fight as his 48th fight.

Floyd and Manny remains the highest selling combat sports PPV of all time, selling 4.6M PPVs. Four months later, Floyd and Berto sold 300k buys at a cheaper price.

The reason is simple: We pay to watch Floyd lose. He's a heel and we dislike him (even though we all agree he's a top 25 OAT boxer). I want to see Floyd lose badly. I want to watch him asleep on canvas while a ref pointlessly counts to 10. I want to see him cry in a post fight interview and make excuses about how a perfect record never really mattered to him (even though from every single 1st and 2nd person account, it does).

He's at worst the 2nd best heel in boxing history and we want to watch him lose. Once that happens, whether it's as a result of a Manny or Conor left or a Mosley or Maidana right, we've lost interest.

300,000 Floyd fans and slappies tuned in to watch him ride off into the sunset against Berto, and 300,000 fans tuned in to watch Manny fight Jesse Vargas. 300,000 fans watch the average non-Conor/Rhonda UFC PPV.

In order to get big numbers, we need a hook, and the possibility of Floyd losing is our hook. Once that's gone, the number of people that give a **** goes way down.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 10:19 PM
Saw some article that a lot of money has been bet on the Irish dude, including some really big bets, so not just amateurs betting 10 bucks. Made me wonder, is there some law against people with financial interest in the fight promotion betting on him to shift the lines and make the fight appear more interesting to get more sales or whatever?
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 10:21 PM
You got Jack Johnson as #1 boxing heel OAT? Dude started riots. Hater$ confirmed furious.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-26-2017 , 11:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
You got Jack Johnson as #1 boxing heel OAT? Dude started riots. Hater$ confirmed furious.
****ed enough white women they literally tried to charge him with a federal crime for it. Haters confirmed furious.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
no, I would say that Nick Diaz's best trialthalon is pretty unimpressive as he lost by a half hour to a 15 year old boy
Ok, so I'm sure you can see the jist of my question....

Why do you think Steph is an elite FT shooter despite being way worse than an out-of-shape middle aged guy, whereas you call Diaz's cardio unimpressive because he performs worse at triathlons than a 15 year old(who I assume is in amazing shape)?

Arguing against Nick Diaz's cardio is just a weird battle to choose to fight. Its like you're going out of your way to be contrarian. By all accounts his cardio is world class even if you can find examples of him losing to a 15 year old/middle aged man/a 59 year old/etc. when he takes up a sport on the side and competes against people who focus on it 100%.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RT
He's at worst the 2nd best heel in boxing history and we want to watch him lose. Once that happens, whether it's as a result of a Manny or Conor left or a Mosley or Maidana right, we've lost interest.
I see what you're saying and I agree that Floyd's draw as a heel would be greatly diminished with a loss, but I think you're underestimating how big the face turn/redemption storyline could be(especially if Conor turns into a huge heel, insulting boxing at every turn, saying its a joke of a sport and that more MMA guys could prob come in and "dominate" like he did).

I realize this is a horrendous analogy, but its kinda like the nWo invasion of WCW back in the late 90s....there were plenty of heels who instantly became faces just because they were "defending the honor of WCW against these outsiders."
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 01:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
Ok, so I'm sure you can see the jist of my question....

Why do you think Steph is an elite FT shooter despite being way worse than an out-of-shape middle aged guy, whereas you call Diaz's cardio unimpressive because he performs worse at triathlons than a 15 year old(who I assume is in amazing shape)?

Arguing against Nick Diaz's cardio is just a weird battle to choose to fight. Its like you're going out of your way to be contrarian. By all accounts his cardio is world class even if you can find examples of him losing to a 15 year old/middle aged man/a 59 year old/etc. when he takes up a sport on the side and competes against people who focus on it 100%.
Umm, if you bothered to read the thread you'd know that the point he's arguing against is "Nate Diaz has the next level cardio that no boxer can hope to approach"

And no he's not competing against people who focus on it 100%, he finished his last triathlon 1 HOUR behind some IT guy, ranked athletes don't ever show up in those local mom-and-pop triathlons
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 02:12 AM
I'm pretty sure i'd drown if I had ever entered a triathlon at any point in my life.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 02:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
Comparing someone who does something as a secondary sport vs someone who does it as their main focus is completely unfair.

A somewhat embarrassing personal example....I attended a beginner's muy thai class a few years ago. I had a very strong core at the time, would guess I was squatting around ~360 and deadlifting around ~450. The class was full of mediocre athletes(but who had been to this class many times before). We did a bunch of high-rep ab work in warmups, and I was the only one in the class who couldn't finish(my abs started cramping up).

People who regularly train a specific movement are going to be way better than those who only train it occasionally, even if the latter group is in way better overall shape.
Reading your first and last paragraphs in this post, I don't understand how you are arguing that McGregor is going to have better cardio than Floyd in a boxing match.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 06:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
No, popularity is based on all of those factors, not just the ones that support your side of the argument. Please do show some stats that support your position then. So far it has been me posting data and you throwing out your opinion as fact. What are the TV numbers in Ireland when Conor fights?

High school American football games can support 50,000+ people because you can still get a reasonable view of the action from the nose-bleed seats. I've been at UFC events with less than 20,000 people where I needed to watch the jumbotron everytime they clinched because I couldn't tell what was happening otherwise.
That 50000 once attended a particular UFC fight somewhere in Australia or Canada does not prove that it's a big sport outside the USA. That's not data, it's an uncontextualized data point. UFC has its fanbase in a handful of countries and is mostly unknown in the rest. Ireland is so tiny it proves nothing. And less so when we're talking about an Irishman. In Spain some old ladies think that Poli Diaz got robbed fighting some American boxer they can't name (it was Pernell Whittaker, who dominated the fight obviously), but that doesn't prove that boxing is popular in Spain (it isn't) just that jingoistic pride is universal.

There's no better indicator that MMA (and boxing) has problems than the existence of this fight.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 06:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by estefaniocurry
Also Canada is not "outside the US''.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
How will getting punched repeatedly in the face and body affect Conor's cardio?
FYP

Answer: Severely. LDO.

Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 07:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
Ok, so I'm sure you can see the jist of my question....

Why do you think Steph is an elite FT shooter despite being way worse than an out-of-shape middle aged guy, whereas you call Diaz's cardio unimpressive because he performs worse at triathlons than a 15 year old(who I assume is in amazing shape)?

Arguing against Nick Diaz's cardio is just a weird battle to choose to fight. Its like you're going out of your way to be contrarian. By all accounts his cardio is world class even if you can find examples of him losing to a 15 year old/middle aged man/a 59 year old/etc. when he takes up a sport on the side and competes against people who focus on it 100%.
Assani - do you think the 15 and 59 year olds are training triathlons full time?
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote
07-27-2017 , 08:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher

I see what you're saying and I agree that Floyd's draw as a heel would be greatly diminished with a loss, but I think you're underestimating how big the face turn/redemption storyline could be(especially if Conor turns into a huge heel, insulting boxing at every turn, saying its a joke of a sport and that more MMA guys could prob come in and "dominate" like he did).

I realize this is a horrendous analogy, but its kinda like the nWo invasion of WCW back in the late 90s....there were plenty of heels who instantly became faces just because they were "defending the honor of WCW against these outsiders."
But if Conor wins, boxing IS a joke, no amount of wins by Floyd is going to change that.

If a dude can practice any sport for a few hours a week and come in and beat a guy that's considered one of the GOATs, there's no need to compete in that sport anymore.
Conor McGregor vs. Floyd Mayweather (August 26th) Quote

      
m