You're right:

















Her modelling profile said she was available for nudes and artistic, so I'm still optimistic.

This is a great picture. Either the photographer thought it was an awesome pose, or he was just like **** it, let's see what dumb **** I can get this broad to do. All fours in the creek, now!

Just searching for the elusive leach porn prospect.

I know you're not a homer and you made a lot of good posts in the cam newton thread. I don't want to argue bama/auburn in this thread. I just can't let a comment about Saban cleaning up bama's program slide when I know what I know about it.

She would be so much hotter without that boob job IMO.

Fair enough. I know what it was like 20 years ago, and 10 years ago. I would be shocked today to find out through court documents that 'Bama had won a half million dollar bidding war among half the SEC for a defensive lineman. Even more shocked if it turned out 'Bama compliance had conducted an Ohio State-style laughable investigation. Back then, not so much.

the whole nitty and stupid debate about cities/population/bama ignored the real problem - arkansas is not a tier 2 school. They're not in the top 25, maybe top 30. And if we're including non-top 25 teams in tier 2, you need to revise your tiers.

Nice subtle dig at Florida.

and LSU

OK, good. Now, how many do you think Bama "legitimately" has?

I have no idea. I just know some of them are a joke. In the 70s ND and Bama were undefeated and met in a bowl and ND won. And Bama claims the national title! WTF?!

So, give me the criteria that leads to "some" of bama's claims being "a joke" but also gives the barn "8-10".

grunching, but serious lol at comparing Nebraska and Kansas to Ohio and Michigan. I don't think people realize exactly how rural the stretch from Kansas north to North Dakota is.

yeah, does it count if Michigan fans start a rumor that Les Miles is going there even though he isn't/doesn't/didn't/won't?

do you mean like blood-sucking leeches or are you getting Mike Leach involved in this

I think this sums up the population differences nicely

it actually overrates the smaller states

would be better to do house members, ducy

After the next census, Nebraska will be down to 2 congressional districts: Omaha, and the entire rest of the state. Seriously.

i do, but even as a shorthand it's easy to look at this and understand that the rust belt is way more populated than the corn belt

yeah. i just really wanted to try to bring back ducy

The criteria is common sense. If two undefeated teams meet in a bowl game, the team that loses doesn't win the national championship.

Okay, I looked on wiki and Auburn has had 12 undefeated seasons and 8 "national titles" if you count any old poll as a national title. So I was pretty close.

yeah, I don't know how the top 2 football schools in a weak conference would be happy with anything except winning their conference.

Plus, you know, I actually went to one of the schools (and all their games) so I know the mentality.

Here's another way to look at it. Would anyone not leave his T2 for Arky? Would a coach rather stay at Sparty, UCLA, or Clemson? I think the entire OMG SEC thing makes it a slightly upward move.

FYI, Alabama doesn't "count any old poll as a national title". So no, you're not pretty close.

Using "common sense" would eliminate two of the four barner "titles" you listed (2004, when Auburn didn't qualify for the national championship under the rules they had previously agreed to, and 1993, when they were on probation and a post-season ban). 1983 would not be counted under the criteria that Alabama uses, either.

The only year you've actually mentioned as "bogus" was 1973. But in 1973 the national championship was decided before bowls were played. Trying to change the rules after the fact goes against pretty much anything that might even remotely qualify as "common sense."

The only title that alabama actually claims that might be considered questionable is 1941. The other 13 are solid.

cliffnotes: lol @ u, haters gonna hate