Better QB: Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, or Eli manning? - Page 3 - Sporting Events and Fantasy Sports

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Sporting Events

Better QB: Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, or Eli manning?

View Poll Results: Which is the better Qb?

Philip Rivers

198 12.01%

Eli Manning

1,337 81.13%

Ben Roethlisberger

113 6.86%

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 3 of 48

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 23

Last

Page 3 of 48

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 13 23

Last

11-10-2009 , 01:05 PM

#51

_EM_

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,325

Quote:

Originally Posted by agdci981

poast less...also FAIL at attempt at humor...

you're just blinded by your homerism, stfu ben sucks.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:08 PM

#52

shane88888

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 8,984

Quote:

Originally Posted by _EM_

you're just blinded by the RRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:11 PM

#53

agdci981

banned

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 10,081

Quote:

Originally Posted by _EM_

you're just blinded by your homerism, stfu ben sucks.

Yes, Ben clearly sucks. I would much rather have Jamarcus Russel as my team's quarterback.

Also, I am not going into all of your ******ed points you made but find it funny that you say Ben has had an "unreal" running game every year he has been in Pittsburgh.

2009- currently ranked 14th at 4.3 ypc
2008- ranked 29th at 3.7 ypc
2007- ranked 8th at 4.2 ypc
2006- ranked 13th at 4.2 ypc
2005- ranked 15th at 4.0 ypc
2004- ranked 21st at 4.0 ypc

So, yea FAIL more....

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:11 PM

#54

BillNye

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 10,048

Not surprised that 45% of this forum is clearly wrong.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:13 PM

#55

joel2006

old hand

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 1,625

Quote:

Originally Posted by _EM_

you're just blinded by your homerism, stfu ben sucks.

Yeah, but he sucks through two rangz. There's a good chance Ben winds up with more rings than Eli and Rivers put together.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:13 PM

#56

_EM_

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,325

Quote:

Originally Posted by agdci981

Yes, Ben clearly sucks. I would much rather have Jamarcus Russel as my team's quarterback.

Also, I am not going into all of your ******ed points you made but find it funny that you say Ben has had a top 5 running game every year he has been in Pittsburgh.

2008- ranked 29th at 3.7 ypc
2007- ranked 8th at 4.2 ypc
2006- ranked 13th at 4.2 ypc
2005- ranked 15th at 4.0 ypc
2004- ranked 21st at 4.0 ypc

So, yea FAIL more....

maybe you should try reading because i never said they had a top 5 running attack clownshoe.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:15 PM

#57

_EM_

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,325

Quote:

Originally Posted by joel2006

Yeah, but he sucks through two rangz. There's a good chance Ben winds up with more rings than Eli and Rivers put together.

by your logic TERRY is the greatest QB of all time...i mean he has the RANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGZZZ ZZZ

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:16 PM

#58

agdci981

banned

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 10,081

Quote:

Originally Posted by _EM_

maybe you should try reading because i never said they had a top 5 running attack clownshoe.

You said "unreal." I would "unreal" constitutes at least top 5....But if not, I provided the stats to show that Ben has actually had very average running games while in Pittsburgh. But nice fail (lol "clownshoe")....

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:17 PM

#59

SharkTank43

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 6,731

You said they have always had an "unreal running attack" though, which is just you talking out of your ass and making stuff up

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:19 PM

#60

_EM_

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,325

their running game has always been solid, they have always had a good offensive run line (faneca was there until last yr i think?). they were good in short yardage, tough running scheme that teams have had troubles with. 4.0 yards a pop isn't bad at all.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:27 PM

#61

Al Davis

newbie

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 31

Quote:

Originally Posted by agdci981

I would much rather have Jamarcus Russel as my team's quarterback.

You're not the only one.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:28 PM

#62

BillNye

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 10,048

Quote:

Originally Posted by joel2006

Yeah, but he sucks through two rangz. There's a good chance Ben winds up with more rings than Eli and Rivers put together.

lol and Tyree >>> Moss, and Dilfer >>>>>> Marino just check the ringz lols

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:48 PM

#63

Pudge714

Modding All Day

Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 39,104

Quote:

Originally Posted by agdci981

Those teams ran the ball like 80% of the time.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 01:56 PM

#64

bigt2k4

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 15,296

basically what everyone else is saying, Rivers then Ben, but its really close and then Eli is quite a bit behind them

Quote

11-10-2009 , 02:18 PM

#65

bnrocks

veteran

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 2,375

2nd and 6 at ARI 6 (Shotgun) B.Roethlisberger pass short right to S.Holmes for 6 yards, TOUCHDOWN.

RANGZ

Quote

11-10-2009 , 02:41 PM

#66

anononon

Guest

Posts: n/a

Rivers and Roethlisberger are about equal.

Eli GMAFB.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 02:49 PM

#67

tarheeljks

The Dark Knight

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 37,654

if a running game is average b/c the defense has an extra defender in the box then that helps the passing game tremendously. in this situation it would be incorrect to say that a qb succeeded in spite of his average running game

Quote

11-10-2009 , 02:58 PM

#68

Max H

veteran

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 3,131

Quote:

Originally Posted by _EM_

by your logic TERRY is the greatest QB of all time...i mean he has the RANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNGZZZ ZZZ

Mr. Bradshaw is undoubtedly not the greatest QB of all time but when comparing him with the three men in this debate he would come out ahead.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 03:15 PM

#69

RacersEdge

banned

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 14,282

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pudge714

Throwing the ball more makes his rate stats more impressive. Using career stats when arguing who is better now is ******ed.

Don't you dare speak ill of Mewelde Moore. Why are you omitting having the a top 2 defense?

I'm just looking at the 2008 offense - yeah the defense was better, but Ben was a lot more than a game manager even last year. They had a pretty good offense, and it wasn't because of a great line, great RBs, or great receivers.

Quote

11-10-2009 , 03:19 PM

#70

tarheeljks

The Dark Knight

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 37,654

Quote:

They had a pretty good offense,

they did?

edit: looks to have been average at best

Quote

11-10-2009 , 03:21 PM

#71

Artdogg

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 8,244

in after RANGZZZZZ

Quote

11-10-2009 , 03:38 PM

#72

Francis_MH

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 10,386

In terms of running good in the playoffs:
Ben>>Eli>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Rivers (not because he ran terrible, but because of how hot the other 2 have ran in the playoffs in comparison)

Last edited by Francis_MH; 11-10-2009 at 04:02 PM. Reason: RANGZZZZZZZZ