Quote:
Originally Posted by natediggity
This is slightly infuriating. How do you lol buffalo and not lol the 3 teams that buffalo offered the same package to that passed up the deal? If it's such a bad deal for buffalo how do we not mock houston, jax, and whoever picked 3rd?
Of course those teams deserved criticism on Draft day. Job security had to play a factor. Tough to trade for picks when you're not certain you'll be around to spend them.
Texans locked in on Clowney somewhat defensible, but whats the plan at QB? If you don't like this year's crop trading into next year is best case scenario .
Rams thought they had stockpiled enough and were ready for a run, questionable considering the state of the division / strength of elite teams in the league but again were hurt by injury.
Jags if you're going to pass on the trade at least they passed to take a QB but sadly I think Bortles was going to be available at #9. They probably didn't think the other qbs would drop so far either.
From the Bills perspective they landed a stud, avoided a bottom 10 finish and most importantly are likely to be employed next season, so they probably view it as a successful job saving transaction. Bad deal for superbowl equity but the coaches and front office will be employed next season which looked doubtful at the time.
Ironically Bills #9 spot looks like the money spot of the draft . Of the standout rookies Mack and WRs Watkins and Evans are the only ones off the board but a better WR is available in Odell and PFFs #1 DT Donald also goes within the next 5 picks.
Last edited by BillNye; 12-24-2014 at 02:06 AM.