Quote:
Originally Posted by GusJohnsonGOAT
Wimbledon is obviously the best. Basically get an entire extra set to decide and if it can't be won by then a tiebreak in reality is probably needed.
This. Actually, combining AO + Wimbledon would be perfect imo, a super tie break at 12-12.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigt2k4
there shouldn't be a tiebreak in the final of any major tournament. Going to 70-68 in a final would be awesome
But also this. Because the above is true for the very finals of a GS. The reason to have a 5th set tiebreaker in the earlier rounds is so it doesn't kill that player, and so that he can still have a chance in the next match, instead of just being entirely drained and exhausted (although he'll still be pretty exhausted). As well as not throwing the rest of the schedule out of wack.
But none of that applies to the final. There's no good reason to have a tiebreaker, even a super tiebreaker in the 5th of a GS final.