If this was Nadal/Djokovic playing at 17-17, everybody would be talking about how great it is that there's no 5th set tiebreak.
Are you really comparing two of the goats with some servebots? Obviously everyone would say that because it would mean the level of the match was probably great
**** it if set gets to 6 all just give the set to the person who won the most points on return of serve during it. These freeloaders like Isner aren't tennis players, they make the game unbearable to watch.
39 games in this set 4 BP's created by one guy. Isner legit can't win unless Anderson chokes on his dick which is always in play.
Has Isner even gotten a point away from break point on Anderson's serve? Just seems hopeless, his best opportunity seems to be to last long enough so it goes into tomorrow
**** it if set gets to 6 all just give the set to the person who won the most points on return of serve during it. These freeloaders like Isner aren't tennis players, they make the game unbearable to watch.
If you want to go that route I'd rather there be some kind of deciding game where nobody serves. Maybe the serve is replaced by a a ball you have drop-bounce-hit into the service box instead of the overhead serve.
Has Isner even gotten a point away from break point on Anderson's serve? Just seems hopeless, his best opportunity seems to be to last long enough so it goes into tomorrow
Are you talking only 5th set, because Isner has broken Anderson twice in the match.
Isner should've played basketball, surely he could've made more money in the NBA. It's really hard to imagine that he couldn't have made the NBA if he had wanted to.
Anderson showed in the QF he is capable of breaking Feds serve, something Isner doesn't do in 1000 tries. Rooting for him, final will be better if he wins.
Also, the break between every 2 games almost seems excessive when the points/games are always short. How many deuces have there even been in this match?
Looked at the betting lines for the over in this match and was like "holy **** o49 games is a lot. Nevermind." in retrospect I should've bet my life savings.