Quote:
Originally Posted by AussieJack
What would be a greater accomplishment, Fed winning a grand slam at 36 or Brady winning a Superbowl at 40? This feels like a future First Take/Undisputed topic.
Interesting Q, seems pretty close. Both are ancient, both have the most titles in their sports.
Brady would pass Manning (39) to become the oldest QB to ever win a SB. Fed would stay 2nd oldest even with a win here, since Rosewall won at 37 (although that was lol 1972, not long after the Open Era started). Seems like that would be a minor point in Brady's favor.
However, individual sport vs team sport would be a point in Fed's favor, since he is solely reliant on his own aging body, while QB's are protected and helped by far younger teammates. I'm not sure if anyone would feel strongly either way, although I'm sure First Take would make it seem that way.