Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotton Hill
These teams used to be pretty evenly matched.
Not sure why Navy can consistently field a decent team and Army fields a crummy one.
A few reasons, I think. The Iraq and Afghanistan wars really decimated Army's recruiting in ways it didn't for Navy and Air Force--being in a boat or plane is rightly perceived as being safer than dodging IEDs while leading combat patrols against an insurgency. This shrank an already limited recruiting pool (entry standards to the academy are quite stringent) that had consisted of academically minded kids who were all-conference type players but otherwise had limited potential to play Division 1/FBS football.
There was also an unfortunate string of coaches who moved away from triple option. A conventional, single back offense just doesn't work when you're outweighed by 50 lbs/player on the line. A traditional offense also meant that opposing teams had to spend very little practice time preparing to play Army, whereas the triple option forces teams to spend time practicing on how to stop it (blow your assignments against a triple option attack and you'll get gashed at 12-14 yard clips).
While Army has had a poor year (lots of injuries), I feel pretty good that Jeff Monken (a Paul Johnson disciple) will get things turned around eventually. There's a deeply entrenched culture of losing in the program that regrettably won'd disappear overnight.
Also, huge credit to Navy for putting together 8ish win seasons over the last ten years, which is a pretty impressive ceiling for a service academy.