Quote:
Originally Posted by -Insert Witty SN-
everything about this post makes sense except for ESPN editor rejecting info on that basis of journalistic excellence. seems like they will report the most specious of speculations to fill hyperactive news cycles.
i disagree, the kind of specious speculations they do constantly report are of a different sort. as a big top tier media outlet you can't just openly mention and publicize a story about an NFL player like him illegally carrying and firing a gun if there is no solid evidence. The victim in question refused to finger him so how can ESPN report it? Not the same as suggesting a trade rumor with no evidence, or suggesting someone is cheating on their wife.
that suit has been out there for months, at least since april. the outline of what happened was probably brought to the attention of ESPN, in some form, very shortly after. But on its own, with the victim refusing to finger anyone, there is no story to report on.
There is a good reason the past shooting lawsuit wasn't publicized, ESPN can't drop something like that on shaky ground. And frankly in isolation, a lawsuit about a shooting in the absence of a criminal charge sounds like bull****, an attempt to shake a wealthy guy down for ~30k (or whatever it would end up being). There are thousands of NFL players, basically. Over a hundred (conservatively) are involved in shady **** to some degree, if ESPN didnt have the standards they did we would be hearing about crimes CONSTANTLY. Or at least hear rumors that they were.
ESPN will completely **** over any semblance of journalistic integrity when it comes to brett farve coming back, or some bull**** like that. But when criminal charges, gun charges, are involved they need something real to go on before it is out there. There is a litany of potential cases like this ESPN reporters hear about, but sit on. This one happens to be the real deal. Hernandez is ****ed.