Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
I'm with you. I thought it was odd, so I went back and checked the criteria, and Bjorn said it was based on current form. Walcott has played 2 games this season, and has been a spot player his entire career. I know he's only 20, but I don't see how he's a top-200 on current, or past form.
I don't think it'd be too difficult to find a couple players from that shortlist to replace them, guys who are actual contributing first-teamers.
Yeah, pretty much...
That is true. In some criteria they're behind I don't even know how many players.
But I wouldn't say the main criteria is perceived form at the moment, more like perceived ability at the moment. Even if that ability in Ramsey's extraordinary case IS NOT, because of what I argue are some special circumstances, YET put to use at the highest level. Thank you Fabregas...
With Walcott, like I said he is so elite in that very difference making area that is speed, that I felt it would be a mistake to leave him off.
That he has hardly played this season haven't quite hurt him like some other players who just missed out. Some of those have barely played in
seasons others are so old you wonder if they can indeed come back at high level, while Walcott though somewhat injury prone has 30+ games the last three years, where I also think he has shown at least a bit more than you imply.
If you're going to the World Cup at 17 for this strong a nation you've definitely shown something special.
With all that said both Walcott and Ramsey are actually the lowest ranked players of their type. Especially the "Walcott type" will show up plenty. With Ramsey like I say in the write up there are other things in play. SO I'm not claiming them world beaters just yet, I just perceive their particular abilities to be very special/valuable.
Last edited by Bjørn; 11-03-2009 at 09:52 AM.