Quote:
Originally Posted by Das Boot
Defensive relative to what? I'm sure you already know but, to state the obvious, when Chelsea play 4-2-3-1 all of his starts have been in the midfield 2. He certainly seems to play pretty deep overall, though ofc I think he's still more positionally varied than a Lucas. Wonder how much set pieces are inflating the shot totals? I went through his PL goals this season, 4 of the six were off free kicks or pens (counting a tap-in off a penalty miss).
wrt shielding the defense, just from a statistical POV: Lampard averaging 2.5 tackles/90 and .8 interceptions/90; Carrick averaging 2.4 tackles/90 and 3.3 interceptions/90. Arteta's "defensive actions" metrics dwarf Lampard's too. And, though obv adjustments have to be made for roles with all this, in terms of creative responsibility, Carrick and Arteta are passing much more than Lampard at higher accuracy with more long balls.
I think he gets forward more than those two, and I'd assume his final third passing numbers show higher volume (and he has incrementally more key passes, though his cross numbers suggest some of that is probably due to set piece duties), but just to me he's a level below the specialist DMs of Arteta/Lucas/Carrick terms of controlling the game both on and off the ball. (Though Arteta trying frantically to reverse that.) If I'm not imagining it, think the Chelsea fans here have also expressed that his recent performances haven't been great?
Yeah I don't give Lampard defensive credit like Carrick. Like you say his work is in a defensive midfield duo of two and very little is proactive but instead reactive deep positioning. In fact Chelsea this season is the team with the least interceptions in the league. This is a
blog post on the defensive metrics in general from earlier this year where the Chelsea-thing was already a trend. Even Ramires who in my mind would seem suited for intercepting "achieve" almost nothing (he is down to 0.9) but interestingly is still one of the most dribbled players in the league with 2 per game. Is he simply failing tactically? That's the same number as Fernandinho which I find much less surprising with the style and dynamic on that team, not least with Yaya, but at least Fernandinho has 2.2 interceptions to his name.
Arteta is getting dribbled at 1.7 and Lampard tellingly with his conservative positioning this season only at 0.8 the same as Carrick which I find impressive but of course also rooted in style of defending. But credit to his defensive decision-making of when to fall back and when he can be more aggressive without being costly.
For Chelsea it will be interesting if Matic arrival, even within Mourinho's tactics, will change things at least somewhat. Here early he is at 2.2 interceptions per game.
But yes it's also what remaining of Lampard's offensive game that still keeps him ahead of Carrick. Being a good ball-striker on set pieces also matter some and I don't really doubt that he can still be a force with that and off-ball where it's most dangerous. Carrick has never had hint of that so that's still a factor even if what Lampard does nowadays is only hinting.
Still if Carrick on a pure subjective level had had a season to his usual standards Lampard was definitely there for the taking more than ever. Without even looking I'm fairly sure Carrick's numbers are what they usually are, I haven't really spotted any slowing down like aoFrantic also noted with Arteta, but Manchester United have mostly been awful both in possession, attacking and far removed from acceptable defensive standards. Carrick even though he is tackling, intercepting and barely getting dribbled like Man U were still out there winning, is in my view still the one supposedly who has the job of holding that together with IMO a huge stake in the Rio/Vidic successes over the years. Maybe much of that fail is on Moyes. Attacking and defending. I think so and also some of it on weaker defenders. But marginally (maybe so much so that I just wasted a lot of words) I'm not finding enough to drive Carrick ahead of the players I've always had him behind.
Lampard, granted much less relied on, has at least been successful within the more successful team concept at Chelsea. I put that on top of his in my view Carrick-like intelligence moving the ball in midfield and of course whatever remains of what was one of the most effective players in recent times because he scored so much while defending.
All that is not to say that Carrick can't be incredibly important, also over more talented players and to take the obvious example I definitely think he should have played a much bigger role for England likely at the expense of Lampard or Gerrard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by the pleasure
Bjorn what are your thoughts in the upcoming Italian squad coming up for the World cup. Even though there hasn't been a finalized roster, we have a fair idea who will be the starting XI and the other 3-4 players that are capable of filling as as prandelli loves to mix and match. I would say what my thoughts are but just wanted to hear your thoughts and see if we agree/disagree
I'm sure I'll talk plenty about this come World Cup. Italy is my team after all. But yeah like will also be indicated on these rankings I do think midfield is the one place where they're special with a lot of quality and depth. Relying on that as much as possible doesn't seem like a bad idea and I guess basically what Prandelli did at EURO12. Other than that I'm disappointed Verratti hasn't already featured more whenever Pirlo hasn't.
My big hope is El Shaarawy somehow proving himself fit and being part.
One big concern is that I don't think much of Buffon these days. I mean there have been periods where seemingly every shot on goal goes in. See CL this season. I think Sirigu is better and it's a joke that he hasn't even always been the automatic number 2.
Overall in this selection thing come world cup, whatever players are in the best physical state should be close to auto-picks I suspect.
Last edited by Bjørn; 04-08-2014 at 10:04 AM.