Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrane
On a sharp market: From what I understand you make your living off this, so maybe you're sharp. But if you go back into all the drafts that we've done, I think more often than not they turn out pretty ugly, pretty quickly. This pervasive idea that 2p2 as a whole is such a sharp board is defs circle-jerky. I'm pretty sure a few select people lead the charge, and the rest follow.
"Such a sharp board" is nebulous and not really what I'm getting at. I'm saying that these drafts produce an efficient market. Efficient markets are more about quality control on the lower end and diversity of approaches to the problem than elite top end analysis. For example, I think our draft produces a way more efficient market than one done by 15 of the best minds in the world + 10 guys from the local bar. Consider how we handled the Luka Doncic pick:
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
if it was longer than a 5 year dynasty it might make sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
Luka lasted one pick longer itt than last night.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket
Prospect is a key word here for Doncic. No way that's a good pick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
way too early for Luka
Quote:
Originally Posted by darO
4. Doncic might be the worst pick of all time
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadood228
With the exception of Doncic, I don't see a lot of difference in value between these guys.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exothermic
while Luka was a troll first pick, he would actually be a good second pick considering the players i see in the second round.
Everyone just matter-of-factly stated it was bad, nobody really argued otherwise, there was an example of one guy being booted so Exothermic was probably a little concerned about being booted himself if he made more picks that could be considered trolls, he admitted it was a bit of a troll while still defending it a bit, and then he audibled to a strategy(Pop + youngs) that isn't good but at least has some coherence to it. Luka going #4 overall definitely isn't good for the "sharpness" of the draft(and one big argument against allowing rookies to be drafted as this does tend to happen), but the way we handled it is what makes our market so sharp. Consider what would've happened in that hypothetical other message board draft with 15 great minds + 10 idiots....there would be pages and pages of discussion where people actually defend it, and too much of the top end quality would get lost in the noise.