Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumMike 357
One thing that tanking teams have to do better is developing future assets. Sharp tanking teams (oxymoron?) have the luxury to give minutes to players that teams trying to compete cannot afford to give. I'd almost treat the season as a tryout and be constantly looking for guys that can be had for cheap. It's easier said than done but it just doesn't seem like the bottom tier teams make enough moves in season.
A decent example of this is Phoenix with Ariza. He fits great now but by the time the Suns are actual playoff contenders he should be a negative player. It would be a major mistake if they didn't trade him this season. I think finding a future role player who fits with my core is more valuable than the increase in development you achieve surrounding youth with veterans.
I would try and load up on as many potential 3+D players as possible. Particularly guys who are just below decent 3pt shooters with above average defensive tools. Guys like Noah Vonleh, OG Anouby, Jonathan Isaac, and Justise Winslow are on the higher end of this target list. I'm sure there's a decent amount of end of the bench players and G-leaguers who could be even more accessible.
I think trying to get all of your players on the same timeline is overrated. Offense can always be adjusted for personnel, so I think one thing teams should do is determine what sort of defensive system they want to create around their core and get players who fit that system. If you have a young core, you should prefer older players who fit your defensive system over young players who project to be a bad fit. If you don't trust in your ability to replace aging role players with draft picks and free agents, you shouldn't be a GM. Or get poor man's versions of the role players you want to surround your future stars with as placeholders until you can upgrade.
With a young team, I'd try to install a try-hard defense and bench players who want to shoot their way to big contracts without any effort on the other end. I'm convinced that scoring specialists who do nothing else well are bad fits for a multi-star core and are a waste of resources if you try to develop them. I'm honestly not sold on Devin Booker as a foundational piece there and can get on board with the idea of trading him in a couple of years for a legitimate two-way star who is several years older.
If Phoenix has cap space in the summer of 2019, one thing that signing Ariza does is demonstrate that a younger, better version of Ariza would be a good fit for the Suns, assuming things go well, and that a free agent who fits that description should strongly consider signing with Phoenix. I don't think the Suns are that smart, but that is why I would have considered signing Ariza in their situation.