Quote:
Is the rake supposed to be taken into consideration at all? Example equity =1.000 pot size =100.00 / expected win =100.00 / actual won =97.00 / Result = -3.00
actually i dont know wether the rake should be substracted from the potsize or not. i dont know how pokertracker saves this because here is a hand from my db:
[ 7h 7s ] [ Ac Qc ] [ 6d 6c 2s 7c _ Jh ] [ 1,0000 ] [ 131,25$ / 131,25$ / 131,25$ / +0,00$ ] [ NL ($0.50) (6 max) ]
the rake saved with this hand by pokertracker is 2.0, how come its +0,00$ in this hand? pokertracker experts may comment on the connections between potsize, rake etc?
does it save it differently for different sites?
Quote:
The program seems to give positive results for pots that are lost, if the all-in push is large compared to villain's stack:
what site is the hh from?
is it common for all pokersites to include uncalled bets in the total pot?
if so, using the potsize to make these equity calculations is pretty flawed indeed.
Quote:
Having troubles downloading:
"You have reached the download-limit for free-users. Want to download more?"
You recently downloaded from rapidshare as a free user and thus have to wait a lil bit till you can download again (or dial in again to get a new ip)