Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Simple GTO question Simple GTO question

10-02-2022 , 08:22 AM
Hi there,

I read a bit about GTO and even got some books about it. Whereas I'm unsure, if it really helps at the felt I find the topic quite interesting.

There is just on point, I don't really understand. Maybe you guys could help:

When I'm indifferent about two (or more) actions, why does the solver suggests different frequencies for both actions though? Shouldn't it be fifty / fifty? I mean when when I'm indifferent shouldn't I have no incentive to play this way or the other? Since I'm employing a mixed strategy it shouldn't be exploitable either.

I don't get my head around it...

Cheers
Philipp
Simple GTO question Quote
10-02-2022 , 02:13 PM
I am not a GTO expert myself, but I guess it might because you are supposed to be betting say 70% of your range on a board and for a specific hand where the solver is indifferent between betting and checking it divides the decisions so that it maintains this ratio?

I would like to hear from GTO gurus who spend some time with the solver on a daily basis.
Simple GTO question Quote
10-03-2022 , 03:30 AM
That might be a logical explanation. I‘m not 100 % sure, but I think I‘ve seen solves where I‘m to bet only 30 % of my range but some indifferent hands bet way more though.

I explained it to myself with blockers, but I‘m unsure about it. I might be completely wrong though.
Simple GTO question Quote
03-08-2023 , 08:31 PM
I think blockers would be part of it. But I suspect that went into deciding which hands were indifferent in the first place, a hand with no blockers perhaps not rising to the level of indifferent. It's probably a combination of not betting/calling/folding all indifferent hands, as that would be too many, and giving you coverage over as many boards as possible to give you playability later in the hand. For example, if a backdoor flush and a backdoor straight were both considered indifferent, if you favored the flush draw over the straight draw an opponent could exploit that by not paying off against possible flushes as much as he should, and attacking more against possible straights.

When dealing with solvers, keep in mind that the solver isn't thinking about the solution. That's what we do. The solver just runs a gazillion simulations based on certain parameters and provides the solution with the highest ev. Then we mere mortals try to interpret why.
Simple GTO question Quote

      
m