Quote:
Originally Posted by jukofyork
If there are few pros playing there and lots of fish still left then it'd be +EV to just write your own HUD/tacker/converter (or pay somebody else to). We are all used to paying around $50 for a tracker/HUD, but if you had the chance of playing in far juicer games then how much would a custom HUD be worth to you? Even for a lone MSNL player it may be well worth paying somebody to write a custom HUD/tacker/converter...
That may well be the case. Who cares? If one MSNL grinder is going to pay for his own personal software (thousands of $ minimum) just so he can get into games that are perceived to be juicier, he sure as hell is not going to share that software with others. Result: one grinder stays, rest leave, 80% less tables running -> 80% less rake -> UB goes out of business.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukofyork
I think this is a good idea in theory, but I'm afraid it just won't work in practice. It's effectively like placing an economic embargo on a country, but then having no downside to ignoring it - thus making it very profitable for the companies who break the embargo... The proposed "protest" won't work for exactly the same reasons: as soon as a significant number of 2+2 TAGs leave the games it'll just be ripe for anybody who doesn't care about the "protest".
Just because a certain tactic has a low probability of success on its own doesn't mean that we shouldn't use it. It seems like a lot of UB/AP players are posting that "this won't work so don't even try it." Well we have a lot more to lose by not trying it. Letting sites steal from players and remain unaccountable could bring down online poker completely. Just wait until the US Congress starts debating a repeal of the UIGEA or similar legislation. You will here all about how sites cheat and get away with it. It would be nice if we could honestly say no they don't get away with it, they go out of business.
You argument about cheating on an embargo has more to do with the current situation than the situation if no HUDs existed. Currently a lot of 2p2 types refuse to play at UB/AP. So in theory the games are softer and those that do play have a higher win rate. Well if those that continue to "break the embargo" don't have HUDs, they won't be able to play as many tables and their hourly rates will go down by 1/2 or 2/3 or whatever. The only way to break this embargo is to write your own software as you suggested earlier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jukofyork
IMHO, the only real way to hurt them is to hit them with bad publicity, but then you risk hurting the whole of the online poker business at the same time (alot of donks already think it's all rigged, so this will just fuel their beliefs). Is it really worth trying to punish UB/AP if that means you kill the profitability of online poker as a whole?
Juk
There are a lot of real ways to hurt them and we should take advantage of all of them. I really don't understand why a well respected poster like you that seemingly doesn't play at UB would be for hitting them with bad publicity but against trying to shut them down in other ways.
As you correctly point out, hitting them with bad publicity could hurt the industry as a whole. How does that jive with your stated opposition to a campaign specifically targeted at only UB/AP?
I guess it kind of sounds like you want to just let them off the hook because bad publicity could hurt the industry. Well the industry might not last too long if we take that route, especially in the US.