Could you make the buddylist resizeable? Sometimes the names [esp on stars] of the tables are so long that the stakes get cut off. Also, filters for the buddylist would be great if its possible to do.

Great site btw. Thanks.

yes this pleasee...buddy list problems for pstars where its says like fast, no allin, 1 on 1, then i cant see the stake level....

also any pstars coverage?

oh and im not sure about the increased hand coverage....you guys are off on my yesterday's performance by about $600 and at least 300 hands....

still like the site though

+1

The FTP LHE 8/16 game does not appear on one of the pages. Not the index page, and not the results page after you do a search. It's the page that comes up after you hit "login."

So when are you going to expand to cover Omaha and other games?

Seems rather bad that you don't think this is necessary.

As long as by expand, you mean shut down or start charging like $100/search.

I can't get action for my life!

Stars.

Here's a feature request, dunno if it has been proposed before, haven't read the threads. I'd like to be able to add comments to each buddy in the buddy list. E.g. "drunk friday nights" etc. You see why this may be useful right?

What's the deal with getting some NL50 and NL25 even NL10 coverage with some players? How accurate are these stats atm?

And I still want the option to opt out.

seeing how they have never even commented about any kind of opt out.... I'd be willing to bet they have absolutely no plans to even consider it

Any plans to track plo next year?

Is the biggest winners list going to reset Jan 1 or will it be a total from last 12 months?

I have my own theory about this. They want to attract attention by not implementing opt out. Once they get the as much free advertising from outraged players and the sites start threatening them, only then they will implement the opt out. No such thing as bad publicity theory imho, nh

Why does the session list show 9-max even though I haven't played 9-max at all, just 6-max? seems like every other session I've had is listed 9-max and the other 6-max.

very much this, just make the window bigger.

Whats the difference between Pokerroom.com and Ongame?
I thought Pokerroom is part of the Ongame network but Ongame has more
tables than Pokerroom.com on your site listed, why?

why is there such a large difference between tableratings and my pt stats? For instance my winrate according to tableratings is 2.29 and pt says 10.2 bb/100 in only 3k hands.

Love the website. Its very useful and pretty interesting just to browse. I would like to see the option of seeing just raw text hand histories instead of clicking through the replayer (which is quite a bit buggy).

I would pay for an option to get stats on players. (AF, cbet%, CR%, CR+W$SD %, etc...)

I'd like to see a search feature where you can see who the consistent/biggest winners are at a particular level and even a tool like sharkscope that will do instant searches on a player with a HUD when they sit at your table so you can be on top of who to gun for.

this is a message to the user TableRatings who is posting here on behalf ot the website tableratings. u should be aware that you are angering alot of people here myself included, by completely ignoring the most important question that has been posed to you here.
you continue to post here in a friendly, professional manner with the apparent goal to receive and respond to feedback regarding your website. HOWEVER, clearly the main issue that people here are interested in and have repeatedly asked you about is THE POSSIBILITY OF OPTING OUT OF YOUR DATABASE.
it is an out and out insult that you completely ignore this pressing question, and then come on here continuing to ask for suggestions and feedback. here's a novel idea- address this pressing issue that has been repeatedly brought up before moving on to ask about further feedback. you cannot simply sweep this question under the rug and expect people to take you or your site seriously.

in refusing to answer this question, it suggests to everyone here that you have ZERO intention to offer and opt out possibility. if indeed this is the case, you would be much better served by simply stating this fact as opposed to leaving us all to speculate.
do the right thing- answer the question regarding the opt out.

Tableratings....any response to my last post above???

Add an option to opt out and take down the biggest losers lists. If you don't I'll be forced to take violent action.

THIS.

Also, are you going to be offering Omaha tracking any time soon?

lol, I for one am glad that there's no option to opt out. Never make it available to the people TR! Too many life nits around here.

Please get rid of the "biggest loser" tool. I don't mind people seeing my stats but I think the biggest loser tool could scare off some fish.