^^Oh, thank you. I must have played more lower and a bit higher, but will only play 7's now. Thanks for your help.
What do you think about the possible ROI form 7's and higher, has my estimation roughly been right? (8-10% 7's / 2-5% higher)

so you got your satisfaction out of my misery? good for you. you seem to have a really likeable character.


you know that you could have just sent me a pm and ask me where i think my level of play is. i give you a hint:i think it is somewhere between bob/j_j and you. that is a pretty wide range tbh but i´d rather be on the safe side with this statement, else you might go even more ape**** at the tables.


see you at the tables shakey.i´m sure i will recognise you

yeah by the river lol

Not getting satisfaction at all, can you not see why over adjusting to somebodys game where in reality they have just ran insanly hot can be detrimental? Hence the question, im just scoping that out. Sorry if that hurts your feelings but my games more important to me.

I have 506 games vs you in my data base not 171. In that sample your chip winnings are six times higher than your ev.

i´m more concerned for your feelings than mine.

the last 3 things i read from you in the ps chat was:
-calling me a female private parts
-offering me a propbet that i wont make it to the leaderboard next year because noone can run so hot for 2 years in a row
-asking me how i can be so bad after playing tens of thousands of games

you should consider anger management classes or start with a sport- like boxing. yea,the idea of you getting punched in the face on a regular basis has a nice sound to it.

you are not trying to adjust, you are trying to smear your feces on everybody that wins a pot against you.

i filtered for this year. overall its about 500 tournaments in which at around tournament 400 you had 28k chips and an ev of 13k. at game 500 you have won 14k chips and an ev of 11k.


see? 50 tournaments ago i couldnt have posted a graph from you where you haven´t run "insanely" over EV. now you are only 27% (14k/11K) over EV.
[] sample size
[x] jerk

Poker would be so boring without this kind of thread

Hold on, last post we had played 171 tournys this year, now we have played 500ish (looks pretty exact to me). I know for a fact my database missed a bunch of games when i was playing alot when i transfered from HM to PT4. Are you being a little bit naughty with your data selections to graph?

Besides chip ev doesnt mean a whole lot besides gauging running hot or bad in general in all in spots. Your complete graph tells a good tale of what i suspected, thanks for posting.

That graph looks insanly swingy, looking at regs graphs i cant find anything even remotely close. Are you sure you havn't got any filters set?

it's 500 games, dude! play 10k and you won't be able to identify the swings you're seeing now. and I'm glad you mentioned that these games are swingy, doesn't matter how you play...

Agreed.

Seriously bob, you are **** man. The amount you have won means **** all. You have run good over like 30,000 games. You're on a heater. You are terrible. You are up on me over 500 games though, that's statistically significant obviously.

Stop being such a fish. I hate you I hate you I hate you. Now I am gonna go tell my mummy on you.

@ brunolf

you clearly do not understand what im saying. When i look at regs i have games on around the same sample size, no graphs are even remotly like that.

And no its not 500 games, its 500 tournys worth of hands where both players are dealt into a hand. This makes the graph biased towards early game.

171 tourneys this year, 500 overall...not THAT hard to understand. and 171 tournaments was right in the context (my graph for the year).
the graph for me is filtered for this year,sngs only and has a small amount (below 100) of 9mans in it. most of it is hypers and hyper sats(they should be in there, not 100% sure about it).

most of the time i´m filtering for this year only so i dont have to extra sort out other tourney types that i played a year++ ago. if that is naughty then yes- i´m a naughty girl and need punishment.

so when YOU run hot the chip ev doesnt mean a whole lot and when I run hot then i suck. alright, got it.

my complete graph doesnt tell the whole story as i have mentioned (eg. running good @ 7$&15$ and bad@30$ and good@60$+ (besides the miserable wcoops-->horrible downswing atm).

well i´m not that good ,you know. and with lower roi come bigger swings. especially at the higher buyins//tough line-ups. since i´m outclassed by the other top leaderboard players i also have big swings. J_J for example never had a big swing
again: filters were "SNGs only, this year" in my graph and "SNGs only" for your graph. feel free to ask me again. and then again. and again.

actually no.i don´t exactly understand what running hot should have to do with adjusting to a players ranges and general ICM decisions.
are you like "omg that guy wins every hand, i better fold"? or like "omg that guy wins every hand, i should copycat his ranges and win all the moneys"?

you have a strange way of interpruting my posts.

The swingy graph i was talking about you vs me, not your overall graph.

Somthings going over your head here, somthing i do not wish to point out as its not in my interest. nm.

Not even close, the last bit is close but still no.

keep your precious secrets. so i dont feel the urge to reply. win/win. thank you.

not close-but close-but still not close.got it.



gosh...i should never ever have posted any answer in the first place.

His command of the English language is clearly better than yours. How's your German?

He's also a better player than you.

Sucks to be you dude.

I got what i wanted, your overall chip ev graph, thanks for posting it.

maybe you could just try asking nicely next time instead of making a complete dickhead out of yourself? i ve already posted graphs and will post graphs in the future again. not much of a secret you uncovered...

this thread kinda motivates me to play a lot more

So glad you reminded me of this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg1o1fO8uug

why are you involved in this conversation? it has nothing to do with you.

Why are you insulting one of our most respected members and acting like a complete tool towards him.

That's the real topic of conversation.

Answer that.

xD

Anyone hit golden yet?

0/190 here

0/241