Quote:
Originally Posted by Brunolf
lol, let's see where you are in 500 games 40% is defintely not sustainable, even at the lowest stakes
Wouldn't have bothered you with my graph right now if it wasn't for Brunolf's explicit request
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angribob
10% would be strong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitesnow
are 1000 games enough samplesize to judge a players skill?
. Don't know, but WILL post my graph next time when reaching the magic 1000. Hoping that will be a brag, not a player whining, giving creative explanations.
I have played only 10k hands in the hypers, try to play each hand as good as I can, single tabling. Classify me as a beginner. Even a win rate of $2/day will give $700 in a year, more than I have made previously. I do the calculations after close to every tournament, finding a lot of spots to improve on, no business playing higher, have to be among the beginners and let's-give-this-game-a-trys. Being a winner, however small, is the best for me for being able to keep having poker as a relaxing activity.