yes.



(as splits are typically 50/50 splits), 43.99/2=22
35.18+22 =57.18 ( pot equity = scoops + splits)

20.83+22= 42.83

57.18+42.83=100 (hero pot equity + villian pot equity =100%)

since the tracking software can only use hands with cards exposed, and use only actual hands and not ranges, the equity figure is always determined by an 'exhaustive' calculation.
for example if heads-up and all in on the turn then 40 trials (the 40 possible river cards) are all that is required to determine equity.

right its nomenclature.

It is designed to measure your win rate, nothing else. I think my previous posts ITT say everything necessary about the whole subject. If you disagree with them, please let me know.

I do slightly with the first sentence. See below.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...9&postcount=31

I actually think we are of a similar viewpoint. The use of the stat is very narrow. I don't think this is appreciated by a lot of people.

I believe one of your posts highlighted some of the other issues. They were valid points.

Overall, knowing my adjusted winnings doesn't make me a better player. Therefore, personally I have never used it. I don't see how it would ever increase my win rate.

I Disagree, A lot of regs i played saved a lot of money because of the stats. (and increase there winrate this way ) If the stat did not exist these player who run hot would keep playing and lose lots of money to me. Now they did see they where only lucky with all-ins and that they get crusht EV wise so they stop playing me.

1. Lose a bunch of similar all-ins. Let's say naked top set hands on a drawy flop, like QKQK on a 45K board.

2. Think to yourself, "Wow I'm running really bad here!"

3. Look at allin line on graph and discover you weren't running nearly as bad as you thought, and were even an underdog in some of them.

4. Vow to yourself to play top set more, uh, delicately in the future in similar spots.

5. ????

6. Profit?

____________


It's like this: we all probably agree the worst mistake for a player to make is to blame bad play on bad luck, but IMHO the 2nd biggest mistake is the opposite, to blame bad luck on bad play. Then you change things up and start actually playing bad. It's like that old trope, of the noob NLHE player saying, "well I lost with AA the last 42 times I raised it pre so now I'm just gonna limp it behind 17 limpers from now on!" And this really happens all the time (the numbers 17 and 42 might be exaggerations.)

bink

A classic insightful OMB post, that doesn't say or reveal anything.

It's a good post, but there is nothing new for me. Again, EV-corrected result does not quantify your expected win rate accurately, it just does a better job at it than your actual win rate. Someone might jump the conclusions after 5k hands, but that doesn't make the stat useless. Knowing your actual win rate doesn't make you a better player either btw.