Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotchOnDaRocks
Suppose you dumped all of your records into excel, shade the entire equity line and should give you an average
Now pretend when working in that same excel sheet for any equity less than 35 you zero out the equity. Then shade the row again and get a new average
But no worries as I think we can use Newall if this communication gap cannot be fixed
i don't have records and i'm not using a spreadsheet (but that is unimportant) as i may understand your analogy.
an average = the sum of entries/the # of entries
in your analogy the entries are equity on a specific flop
(given we are using a range 25%6h instead of exhaustively using every possible flop, we have selected 600,000 random flops)
so we have 600,000 equity entries.
the sum of the 600,000 equities/600,000 = avg. showdwon equity on a random flop
next
you suggest we replace the equities associated with flops where the flop equity is <35% with 0
and you would like this average.
the question i have is what do you think the denominator ought to be;
600,000 once again? or if we are replacing 226,200 equity figures with 0(37.7%), should the denominator be 373,800?
btw for 'Ay7x9zTx' when its 600,000 the equity figure i believe will be the aforementioned 35.13%
and when you use 373,800 the equity figure i believe will be the aforementioned 56%