Quote:
Originally Posted by monikrazy
To clarify, the main argument for fold would be that our hand is too vulnerable to a squeeze, and it sounds like there may be 4 players left to act.
Similarly, we should be playing a very tight strategy as a 50bb stack and while akqq3 is an ok hand, its not good enough to stack off with pf in most scenarios - so 4! for 30% of stack is a disaster - moreover, we will have to put in the rest on a ton of flops.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draw2pat
Agreed.
why not ask OP to clarify Hero's position, it obviously has an influence?
did UTG (the preflop raiser) post the $10 blind? seems to me it would be useful for this to be clarified so that we can then assume posters understand and account for it.
with UTG raising and UTG+1 calling .....Hero is the 3-better (3!) not 4!. the 3bet for $150 is 30% of effective stacks. Doesn't this make hero the 'squeezer'?
a hero that 3bets 30% of effective stacks must be planning to call a 4bet, unless he's expecting folds to his 3bet 70+%of the time, so I'm really confused about hero's vulnerability to a squeeze.
the above notwithstanding, its clear you believe (AK3)QQ is not strong enough to get all in preflop (3-bet/call) or on most flops for a pot bet.
so, for my clarification...what are you assuming UTG"s ranges to be; open, fold to 3-bet, call 3-bet, 4bet(shove)? is UTG influenced by having "a whale" to his immediate right?
and What is hero's perceived 3bet range?
Last edited by ngFTW; 08-18-2020 at 12:55 PM.