Quote:
Originally Posted by NickMPK
What confuses me is that in your OP you said you believed there was almost zero chance either villain already had a full house. If your read is correct, I think this is a clear call. If neither opponent has a boat, it is very unlikely you will get whipsawed on the turn. And given that, you clearly have pot odds to call, even after slightly discounting your low outs and even more deeply discounting your flush outs.
And yet you folded. Is it possible that you didn't actually believe that in the moment, but have since updated your read based on the the results? Because your read and your action seem inconsistent.
It seems like most people in this thread are advising a fold. And I don't necessarily believe that's wrong. But I do think anyone advocating folding is implicitly disbelieving your read.
Having a full house is less important than whether another player has a2, because my hi prospects are super poor.
But given my reads and post-mortem i do feel i should have called. And probably a lot of the time i would anyway.
