Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotchOnDaRocks
I guess it's okay if we know for sure CO will bet the turn regardless but can't really count on that and just handing out 20% equity to two low clubs that probably would have folded is a bad result. UTG may have them as a premium four low cards double suited type of hand makes sense with a limp re-raise.
Now if cut-off re-raised with something like A2Q5 he may just check again. Is he checking A2K5 if it got checked around twice? Probably yes, I would think but if the situation is like this a bet needs to go in
Hand | Pot equity | Scoops | Wins Hi | Ties Hi | Wins Lo | Ties Lo |
---|
ad 7d as 6s | 75.00% | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ah 2c 3c 5h | 19.44% | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ac kd 2h 8d | 5.56% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20% equity is around 1.35 big bets
I meant to type is the button betting A2K5 when it checks around twice, I'd say yes..but not sure and a bet needs to go in
No one is limp re-raising a hand with a nine in it, so UTG does not have one but could easily have 5-25% equity. Denying him this equity is more important than either trying to induce or save a bet against the button (if he was lucky enough to 3 bet with A2Q9 or A2KK congrats to him and he will win an extra bet) because a flush draws equity share is more than a big bet.
Yeah maybe someone does not have a flush draw, but you can collect bets from a King and also deny equity to a lone 4 from UTG.