Two Plus Two Poker Forums How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read TwoPlusTwo.com

 Notices

 Two Plus Two Magazine Forum Articles and features about poker and gambling in general.

 04-08-2009, 06:10 PM #51 LargeLouster centurion   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 128 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? One of the problems here is trying to answer a mathematical question with language. Language may make it easier to understand a mathematical equation, but words seldom give you a precise answer since words seldom mean exactly the same thing to different people. That's one of the reasons humans invented mathematics. The question being debated is the chance of being dealt pocket aces twice in a row. If you let A represent the correct answer, the only precise way to describe it is the equation: A=1/(52*51/4*3)*1/(52*51/4*3)=1/221*1/221=1/44,841
04-08-2009, 06:22 PM   #52
Actually Shows Proof

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: This looks interesting.
Posts: 7,904
Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LargeLouster One of the problems here is trying to answer a mathematical question with language. Language may make it easier to understand a mathematical equation, but words seldom give you a precise answer since words seldom mean exactly the same thing to different people. That's one of the reasons humans invented mathematics. The question being debated is the chance of being dealt pocket aces twice in a row. If you let A represent the correct answer, the only precise way to describe it is the equation: A=1/(52*51/4*3)*1/(52*51/4*3)=1/221*1/221=1/44,841
Except you mistyped the result, 48,841.

 04-08-2009, 07:26 PM #53 LargeLouster centurion   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 128 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? Oops! I stand corrected, it is 48,841. Sorry about that, my typing sucks!
 04-08-2009, 08:08 PM #54 mtnpoker centurion     Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 171 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? What are the probabilities that at a nine-handed table, I and the same opponent get dealt JJ and 99 on two consecutive hands, with me getting the JJ twice? Happened to me a while back in a Pokerstars EPT Round 1 qualifier, with both of us all-in on both hands.
 04-08-2009, 09:06 PM #55 LargeLouster centurion   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 128 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? I think, but am not certain, it's 1/(52*51/4/3)*1/(50*49/4/3)^2=1/2,035,889,600.69444
 04-09-2009, 09:04 PM #56 LargeLouster centurion   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 128 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? I've decided my 1st answer is wrong because I assumed you meant a specific opponent you had selected before any cards were dealt. Now I think a more realistic reading of your question is that you don't really care which of the other 8 players got the 1st pair of 9's, only that the same player got them twice in a row. This changes the way in which you calculate the odds of you getting JJ in the 1st hand and your "opponent" getting a pair of 9's. Since there are 8 other players it's 8 times as likely that someone will get a pair of 9's. So, the first part of the equation changes to 1/(52*51/12)*1/(50*49/12/8). The second part of the equation remains the same since there are now only 2 players involved and the overall answer is still the product of the two calculations. So, my new answer is 1/(52*51/12)*1/(50*49/12/8)*1/(52*51/12)*1/(50*49/12)=1/254,486,200.086806. I think this is a good example of what i mentioned earlier in this thread, that language is imprecise and can create confusion when discussing things that can really only be expressed with mathematics. Either that or I'm just lousy at reading questions correctly.
 04-10-2009, 03:08 PM #57 Nate. Pooh-Bah     Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Now blogging. Posts: 3,995 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? Mason-- So, when I get dealt aces, and when I think to myself that I just got lucky at the 1/221 event that just happened to me, I guess I'm making some kind of terrible cognitive mistake? --Nate
04-10-2009, 03:09 PM   #58
Nate.
Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now blogging.
Posts: 3,995
Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by MicroBob Came to this forum just to post about this. Glad somebody else was as confused as I was since I would have assumed the odds of any two given hands were 40k:1 as well. Don't feel like digging up my copy of Super System but I thought it specifically said "odds of getting AA on consecutive hands = 48k:1" (or whatever it is). Anyway, I do not know why it isn't 40k+:1 and I don't appreciate the weird condescension of the statement "of course this is wrong" without providing any explanation for the reader. It makes me feel stupid and pretty much turns me off to the magazine as a whole.
MicroBob--

This is pretty much exactly right, and I'll put my math credentials up against anyone's ITT.

Thanks for your consistently good posting, & all my best,

--Nate

 04-10-2009, 04:39 PM #59 LargeLouster centurion   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 128 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? Hey Nate, since you actually have math credentials (I don't, just like algebra) I'd really appreciate it if you would check the math in my answers and tell me if it's correct. Thx in advance. --LargeLouster
 04-10-2009, 06:01 PM #60 Tigerpat enthusiast   Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Orange County,CA Posts: 63 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? Guys...it's like this: If someone asks you what is the probability of flipping heads 4 times "in a row" it is 1/2*1/2*1/2*1/2= 1/16, or 15:1 against. On the other hand, if someone has "already" flipped a coin three times and gotten heads all 3 times, what is the probability of getting heads on the "next flip"? 1/2, or 1:1.
04-10-2009, 06:31 PM   #61
mtnpoker
centurion

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 171
Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Tigerpat Guys...it's like this: If someone asks you what is the probability of flipping heads 4 times "in a row" it is 1/2*1/2*1/2*1/2= 1/16, or 15:1 against. On the other hand, if someone has "already" flipped a coin three times and gotten heads all 3 times, what is the probability of getting heads on the "next flip"? 1/2, or 1:1.
Similarly, if someone has flipped a coin once and gotten heads, the probability of getting heads the next three flips will be 1/8, odds against being 7:1.

But if someone asks me the question of what are the chances of getting 4 heads in a row, I'll assume that no flip has yet been made, and you will now start the 4 flip sequence with the next flip. In this case, the chances that your next 4 flips will all be heads is 1/16, or odds against of 15:1.

Is that an easy to understand explanation?

 04-11-2009, 01:44 AM #62 fraac adept   Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 776 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? The odds of being dealt aces 'twice in a row' or flipping heads 'four times in a row' is undefined without reference to a timeframe, which is why people are offering the known odds after the first event. What you want is the odds of being dealt aces on the next two hands. /thread
04-11-2009, 06:50 AM   #63
Johncx
journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 244
Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by High Time John So then the odds of getting dealt exactly the same two cards (same rank and suit) twice in a row must be much greater than 40K to 1. Interestingly this has happened to me 3 times online and never in a live game. I have played many more hands live than online.
rigged

 04-11-2009, 01:32 PM #64 LargeLouster centurion   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 128 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? The odds are much greater against being dealt 2 specific cards of the same rank twice in a row, ignoring order, because there are 6 ways to get any 2 cards of the same rank, ignoring order, and only 1 way to get 2 specific cards of the same rank, ignoring order. Any two cards of the same rank, twice in a row, ignoring order, is 1/(4/52*3/51)*1/(4/52*3/51)=1/221*1/221=1/48,841. Two specific cards of the same rank, twice in a row, ignoring order, is 1/(2/52*1/51)*1/(2/52*1/51)=1/1,326*1/1,326=1/1,758,276. If you compare the 2 final numbers, you'll notice that the larger number is exactly 6*6=36 times larger than the smaller number. So, getting two specific cards of the same rank, twice in a row, ignoring order, is 36 times less likely than getting any 2 cards of the same rank, twice in a row, ignoring order. I said "ignoring order" because in your post you didn't specify in which order you received the 2 cards. Last edited by LargeLouster; 04-11-2009 at 01:53 PM.
 04-11-2009, 08:48 PM #65 djexacto adept     Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 746 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? Every 221st time you get aces, you will get them on the next hand as well on average.
 04-12-2009, 02:07 AM #66 \$taybuffMM grinder   Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Texas Posts: 441 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? [x] Aces twice in a row twice, once at Bella, Once at Jokerstars....A10 3rd hand at bella boooo
 04-12-2009, 09:04 AM #67 jpgray enthusiast   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 78 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? What we're talking about here is the difference between a priori and a posteriori probability. Expectation is a priori, so being dealt AA the next hand is always 1/221 regardless of what the last hand was. The a posteriori probability, the chance of two sequentially dealt hands being aces, is 1/48,841. A fair coin has an expectation of heads 1/2 of the time. After flipping heads once, a second flip has the same expectation as the first. -After you have flipped heads twice-, however, you must revise the probability a posteriori. Say you ask a hold 'em player to select at random a single hand from her entire history, ad infinitum. If that single hand is aces, what are the chances the next is aces? Now say you ask that player to select at random groups of two sequentially dealt hands from her entire history, ad infinitum. If she tells you -at least one- hand is aces, what are the chances the other is aces? Are the answers the same?
 04-12-2009, 12:34 PM #68 dumdonk banned   Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? hmm...interesting, i was dealt aces 3 times in a row in a live cash gme once
 04-12-2009, 01:41 PM #69 bandin old hand     Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,837 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? the way that mason describes it when he says its much less than 40k to one is just him saying that the odds of getting aces the next hand when you currently have them is the same. i dont think it takes a mathematical genius to figure this out; when people ask the question "what are the odds of AA twice in a row" i think the parameters are pretty well defined already, that is, what are the odds of AA once then AA again, which is why OP and microbob had issues originally.
04-12-2009, 04:56 PM   #70
ubercuber

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Stars Micro SNG's
Posts: 892
Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Rant Classic Mason. Mathematically speaking, because you have no idea what question the woman was actually asking, you have no idea if the answer is right or wrong. In real life she was given exactly the answer she wanted - the most improbable and amazing, although correct under the right assumptions, one.
The question should be assumed to be framed within her circumstances, which is either that she was dealt exactly two hands or that she was dealt any other number of hands >2 as a part of a session. The most improbable and amazing scenario is the former, therefore most likely she was asking "Given that I was just dealt aces on the last hand, what are the odds I would be dealt them again on this hand?"

Additionally, the other relevant possible question is much more specific and most people would, imo, instinctively phrase the question to include the fact that only x number of hands were dealt if that number were any small number, especially if that number were two.

The low probability of someone being dealt aces on their first two hands AND excluding that additional piece of information from the question make Mason's assumption so overwhelmingly unlikely to be incorrect that it is hardly worth pointing out.

Finally, since Mason's assumption is correct so frequently, and the math is so frequently misunderstood, pointing out the common error is still relevant even if wrong about the circumstances, imo.

Last edited by ubercuber; 04-12-2009 at 04:59 PM. Reason: Just reread the OP... Mason was at the table it sounds like, so he must have known ~ how many hands she was dealt. SIIHP

04-12-2009, 08:18 PM   #71
Nate.
Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now blogging.
Posts: 3,995
Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ubercuber The question should be assumed to be framed within her circumstances, which is either that she was dealt exactly two hands or that she was dealt any other number of hands >2 as a part of a session. The most improbable and amazing scenario is the former, therefore most likely she was asking "Given that I was just dealt aces on the last hand, what are the odds I would be dealt them again on this hand?" Additionally, the other relevant possible question is much more specific and most people would, imo, instinctively phrase the question to include the fact that only x number of hands were dealt if that number were any small number, especially if that number were two. The low probability of someone being dealt aces on their first two hands AND excluding that additional piece of information from the question make Mason's assumption so overwhelmingly unlikely to be incorrect that it is hardly worth pointing out. Finally, since Mason's assumption is correct so frequently, and the math is so frequently misunderstood, pointing out the common error is still relevant even if wrong about the circumstances, imo.
Ubercuber--

That strikes me as very improbable. If I see a frog fall from the sky and think "what are the odds of that?", it's pretty obvious what's going on. The event I'm surprised by is the frog falling from the sky. Now, if I see a frog falling from the sky today and tomorrow, and again I ask myself what the odds are, it's still pretty clear what I'm surprised about: frogs falling from the sky twice in two days. Perhaps it's some variant: frogs on two consecutive days or something like that. It's even conceivable that what I do care about is the conditional probability of a frog tomorrow given a frog today.

But just because event E is a necessary condition for E', or even a necessary condition to make you care about E', doesn't mean that when E' happens, and you wonder what the probability of "that" is, that you aren't referring to E'.

Of course there's a complex causal process leading to the woman asking what the probability of "that" is. And we can argue about where the clearest "joints in nature" here are. But this is, at the bottom, largely a psychological question. The woman got aces twice in a row, and I'd bet a whole lot of money that the "that" she asked about was the aces twice in a row. Mason's taken plenty of courses in statistics, but that doesn't mean he gets to choose what other people's pronouns refer to.

All my best,

--Nate

04-12-2009, 08:57 PM   #72
Actually Shows Proof

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: This looks interesting.
Posts: 7,904
Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1?

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Nate. The woman got aces twice in a row, and I'd bet a whole lot of money that the "that" she asked about was the aces twice in a row. --Nate
This.^^
"Aces twice in a row" is a specific event (one), with a precise probability, and only one answer to the question is possible. The woman absolutely was not asking about the probability of "being dealt a pair of Aces". Twisting the question to imply that is nonsensical, and in the circumstances it would require a belief in the gambler's fallacy to even ask it.

 04-13-2009, 07:42 PM #74 LargeLouster centurion   Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 128 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? Needless to say, the probability that my typing still sucks remains at 100%. On line 6 of paragraph 1, I incorrectly spelled statistically as statistacally and on line 15 of paragraph 3, I incorrectly typed 48,841 as 48,441. Last edited by LargeLouster; 04-13-2009 at 07:58 PM.
 04-13-2009, 09:41 PM #75 Brett Marr stranger   Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Gold Coast Posts: 4 Re: How is being delt aces twice in a row not over 40,000-to-1? I was delt AA 3 hands in a row in a cash game 2.50 5.00 Nlh won all three thet wernt big pots though

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Links to Popular Forums     News, Views, and Gossip     Beginners Questions     Marketplace & Staking     Casino & Cardroom Poker     Internet Poker     NL Strategy Forums     Poker Goals & Challenges     Las Vegas Lifestyle     Sporting Events     Politics     Other Other Topics Two Plus Two     About the Forums     Two Plus Two Magazine Forum     The Two Plus Two Bonus Program     Two Plus Two Pokercast     The Best of Two Plus Two Marketplace & Staking     Commercial Marketplace     General Marketplace     Staking - Offering Stakes     Staking         Staking - Offering Stakes         Staking - Seeking Stakes         Staking - Selling Shares - Online         Staking - Selling Shares - Live         Staking Rails         Transaction Feedback & Disputes     Transaction Feedback & Disputes Coaching & Training     Coaching Advice     Cash Game Poker Coach Listings     Tournament/SNG Poker Coach Listings Poker News & Discussion     News, Views, and Gossip     Poker Goals & Challenges     Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance     That's What She Said!     Poker Legislation & PPA Discussion hosted by Rich Muny     Twitch - Watch and Discuss Live Online Poker     Televised Poker General Poker Strategy     Beginners Questions     Books and Publications     Poker Tells/Behavior, hosted by: Zachary Elwood     Poker Theory     Psychology No Limit Hold'em Strategy     Medium-High Stakes PL/NL     Micro-Small Stakes PL/NL     Medium-High Stakes Full Ring     Micro-Small Stakes Full Ring     Heads Up NL     Live Low-stakes NL Limit Texas Hold'em Strategy     Mid-High Stakes Limit     Micro-Small Stakes Limit Tournament Poker Strategy     STT Strategy     Heads Up SNG and Spin and Gos     Mid-High Stakes MTT     Small Stakes MTT     MTT Community     Tournament Events Other Poker Strategy     High Stakes PL Omaha     Small Stakes PL Omaha     Omaha/8     Stud     Draw and Other Poker Live Poker     Casino & Cardroom Poker         Venues & Communities         Regional Communities     Venues & Communities     Tournament Events         WPT.com     Home Poker     Cash Strategy     Tournament Strategy Internet Poker     Internet Poker         nj.partypoker.com         Global Poker         MPN – Microgaming Poker Network         Big Ugly Poker     Commercial Software     Software         Commercial Software         Free Software General Gambling     Backgammon Forum hosted by Bill Robertie.     Probability     Sports Betting     Other Gambling Games 2+2 Communities     Other Other Topics         OOTV         Game of Thrones     The Lounge: Discussion+Review     EDF     Las Vegas Lifestyle     BBV4Life         omg omg omg     House of Blogs Sports and Games     Sporting Events         Single-Team Season Threads         Fantasy Sports     Fantasy Sports, sponsored by Draftboard.com         Sporting Events     Wrestling     Golf     Chess and Other Board Games     Video Games         League of Legends         Hearthstone     Puzzles and Other Games Other Topics     Politics     History     Business, Finance, and Investing     Science, Math, and Philosophy     Religion, God, and Theology     Travel     Health and Fitness     Laughs or Links!     Computer Technical Help     Programming International Forums     Deutsch         BBV [German]     Français     Two Plus Two en Español

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.

 Contact Us - Two Plus Two Publishing LLC - Privacy Statement - Top