Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who will run against Trump in 2020? Who will run against Trump in 2020?

02-19-2019 , 12:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
heh Booker's odds right now are longer than those of Michael Pence

https://www.oddschecker.com/politics...on-2020/winner
I don’t think Booker has a chance. I am saying people like Booker will weaken Bernie’s position vs whoever ends up being the establishment candidate.
02-19-2019 , 01:01 PM
Arctic take: Bernie wins the nomination or we get four more years of Trump
02-19-2019 , 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
We've had that around here, by the way. The system was rife with fraud. It was easy to scam the government because they're incompetent, and a few years ago nearly 200 supposed daycare centers in Milwaukee were shut down after crackdown investigations. Tens/hundreds of millions of dollars were stolen from the WI treasury. One lady in particular managed to swindle over $3,000,000 from the system and was arrested in her fancy new house. She was eligible for 35 years in prison but sentenced to 14 months.

Christ, the school districts themselves participate in sketchy behavior by artificially inflating attendance on the "count days" so they get more state funding, I can't imagine what sort of shenanigans will be dreamed up in a national program where it'll be impossible to oversee them all.
For the benefit of the readers, this is at least mostly true. Rampant fraud was uncovered in 2009, and obviously nothing was done about it because fraud in government programs is an unfixable and inherent problem.

Oh wait, no, that last part is not true at all. Scott Walker managed to do something reasonable and implemented a crackdown on fraud and quality standards for childcare providers to be eligible for subsidy money in 2012. Warren is proposing having quality standards, btw. There is even an already-existing, high quality federal child care program that can be emulated and generalized rather than copying Wisconsin's first draft.
02-19-2019 , 01:10 PM
"It can't be done because Wisconsin failed at it" is certainly a take
02-19-2019 , 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Arctic take: Bernie wins the nomination or we get four more years of Trump
We might get 4 more years of Trump anyway. The dem party is too fractured right now. I don't see moderates or independents going strong for Bernie/Warren. Centrists like Biden/Booker will alienate the far left progressive base.

Meanwhile when the chips are down Trump will always have his conservative and religious base. When the election is decided by 3-5 states that could be enough. If I had to wager today I'd bet on Trump getting reelected unless the economy tanks.
02-19-2019 , 01:16 PM
I love that searching for 200 daycare providers closed leads to this page (which is a site Insoo linked already haha).

http://archive.jsonline.com/watchdog...05115859.html/

rubbin' money on tittays
02-19-2019 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Arctic take: Bernie wins the nomination or we get four more years of Trump
I think this is an absolutely scalding take.
02-19-2019 , 01:17 PM
The two most important traits for me in a candidate are: liberal and anti-establishment. Bernie and Warren are good. I like Harris too but she's not as liberal or anti-establishment as them, so if there is a large contingent of the party that is more moderate, she might be able to unify everyone. Beto is a bit of a wild card. None of the other candidates interest me much.
02-19-2019 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
The large field hurts Trump, especially since that large field does not feature Mitt Romney.

All of Trump's weaknesses (relative lack of appeal to minorities for example) will be on much sharper display when he's running into more politically savvy and more charismatic candidates like Ted Cruz.

Trump's best chance may be having someone like Jeb! clearing the field early and then portraying Jeb! as a Romney like insider (he is) and grabbing enough delegates to make it impossible/irrelevant for super delegates to go Jeb!'s way.
Amazing how well it fits, imo. But anyway, I disagree because Bernie has a very high floor compared to all but the most well-recognised names in the potential field, which means a Biden entry would hurt Bernie, not help him, certainly in initial polling and probably well past Iowa.

Portraying this or that rival candidate as this or that bad thing is for later in the game, when the field is narrowed, or, at the earliest, when the Momentum Carousel starts to turn. Early doors and assuming a large field a la the GOP in '16, you don't want to mention your opponents by name at all, especially not if you have higher name recognition. You want them talking about you, not you talking about them. Everything you say should be about you, about your policies and vision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonfiction
2 months old now but this talking point is endlessly repeated.
They can't allow a big lying liar who tells lies like me to get away with it, that's all
02-19-2019 , 01:28 PM
Or, dispense with the myriad of easily gamed programs and consolidate all welfare systems into a monthly check made out to John Q. Poorguy and call it a day. If he spends it on things not related to meeting his daily needs, too bad so sad.
02-19-2019 , 01:32 PM
Bernie sanders will be 79 in 2020 and 83 by the end of next presidency.
That is really old.
02-19-2019 , 01:41 PM
I don't see how Bernie is not the favorite in the current pool of democratic candidates.
02-19-2019 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by weeeez
Bernie sanders will be 79 in 2020 and 83 by the end of next presidency.
That is really old.
Ok, but he looks very healthy in the video. Healthier than Trump.
02-19-2019 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
I don't see how Bernie is not the favorite in the current pool of democratic candidates.
Because you live in an internet bubble. There's a real world out there filled with millions of people who aren't part of the woke internet club of uber-lefties.
02-19-2019 , 01:48 PM
He is spitting hot fire



especially 3:30
02-19-2019 , 01:50 PM
i take ****s that look healthier than trump
02-19-2019 , 01:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Because you live in an internet bubble. There's a real world out there filled with millions of people who aren't part of the woke internet club of uber-lefties.
And in that real world, Bernie got 43% of the 2016 primary votes, and all indications point to his brand of politics getting more popular in the Democratic Party since then
02-19-2019 , 01:52 PM
Yes, in a race against one Hillary Rodham Clinton. Context matters.
02-19-2019 , 01:52 PM
Bernie is too old but as long as he picks a good VP then I don't care.
02-19-2019 , 01:54 PM
Bernie's politics are more popular now. A bunch of Bernie-like candidates were elected in 2018. There is no other candidate running with huge built in notoriety like Hillary had in 2016. If Biden runs, then he will probably be the favorite, but as of now...
02-19-2019 , 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Or, dispense with the myriad of easily gamed programs and consolidate all welfare systems into a monthly check made out to John Q. Poorguy and call it a day. If he spends it on things not related to meeting his daily needs, too bad so sad.
For things like child care and health care and education, government programs provide more equitable and efficient solutions than just cutting checks. For other things, like food, sure, cutting checks is preferable.
02-19-2019 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
He is spitting hot fire

especially 3:30
This is how it should be done. No touchy-feely personal stories, no "let's reach across the aisle" bull****, just come out the gate with your agenda.
02-19-2019 , 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
"It can't be done because Wisconsin failed at it" is certainly a take
Works in other places, didn't work perfectly under Scott Walker. I wonder if the problem was the program or the incompetent government in charge at the time!?!

I'd sell Biden so much btw. He's never winning.
02-19-2019 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Works in other places, didn't work perfectly under Diamond Jim Doyle. I wonder if the problem was the program or the incompetent government in charge at the time!?!
I know governors all just blend together, but this one is worth correcting.
02-19-2019 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
One lady in particular managed to swindle over $3,000,000 from the system and was arrested in her fancy new house. She was eligible for 35 years in prison but sentenced to 14 months.

This lizard-person defrauded Medicare for hundreds of millions of dollars and his company ended up paying ~$900 million in fines for it, he was charged with nothing and went on to be a 2 term Governor and is now a sitting US Senator.

      
m