Warren Woman Bad

Did you really take All-In Flynn off ignore for 1 post because you couldn't stand not responding to the suggestion that Bernie and his ideas have been attacked?

Also, how functional is your ignore list if you just click "view post" on everything he says anyway? You seem to be lacking a bit in self-control.

Did I ever say I put him on the 2p2 managed ignore list? rofl, speaking of goofikes just inventing other people's positions out of thin air. You seem to be a bit lacking in reading comprehension.

I mean you're just like, angrily agreeing that yes, Sanders has been attacked ITT.

I mean I get it, man, you want revenge from embarrassing yourself a couple of days ago. No-one else cares or probably even remembers, though, so tell you what:

Donald Trump is a really good President with excellent policies and a competent approach to statecraft. He possess numerous other admirable qualities also.

^There, that's something really, properly stupid you can get your teeth into. Quote that and go hog-wild, get it off your chest.

Troubled Trolly can't stop talking about articles he hasn't read by people whose gender he's confused about - NOT GOOD!

"I never said 'back on ignore' meant the 2+2 ignore list!"
- d10 thinking he's delivering a sick burn

lmao I love your posting so much

Sorry I don’t live up to the high standard of posting you’ve been displaying here, but donletnus know if you’ve got any other dank Reddit memes that you find clever.

I agree that burn was about as sick as your suggestion that Warren appearing to retreat to a "radical centrist" position is not at all the same thing as actually suggesting she is retreating to a more moderate position and how dare anyone think otherwise, where is my fainting couch? I figured the literal copying and pasting of your words would've been a clue that I was linking the ridiculousness of the two positions together. Looks like I underestimated your ability to catch on to the sledgehammer like subtlety. Do you realize you just sick burned yourself?

I am sure you believe that to be true, and also that no one else will ever know because every other participant in this thread would probably gouge their eyes out before reading the entirety of the post you just wrote.

WE NEED D10 ON THAT WALL

Honestly, that's OK. I'm starting to think there's a curse on this thread that turns people into terrible posters specifically while talking to me. I recognise wheatrich and d10's usernames, but I don't really know anything about them, and they weren't known to me as bad posters. And this lapse into irrelevancy and slightly desperate snark is well below your normal standard.

When d10 once got a similarly-minded dance partner it resulted in the only thread excision I'm aware of ever happening in the programming forum

That was a couple years ago, seems like not a lot has changed

I mean, it is true. Like the entire point of my post was to mock the stupidity of yours, down to the exact phrasing. Also, don't care who reads my posts cause I derive literally zero of my self worth based on what anyone ITF thinks of me. It appears you're projecting your insecurity onto me.

van_zandt_nodding.gif

Goofy and d10 is nowhere the hate**** couple as goofy and ikes.

So looks like Gillibrand is also set to run.

Today in "things that will go over very well in this thread", heeeeeeere's Nathan J. Robinson's take on Kamala Harris!


https://twitter.com/NathanJRobinson/...36482949996546

Quoted article is a review of her new book in The Atlantic today, which also seems unimpressed with Harris' past as a prosecutor:

Tulsi ewwwww

Context: she's running

Hopefully we can all agree she sucks and not waste time talking about her ITT


https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/sta...72459831607300

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard joins Democrats’ 2020 field. She was elected from Hawaii in 2012, becoming Congress’s first female Hindu member.

Don't mean to trigger you guys, and not saying I'm supporting her, but if Tulsi gets on the debate stage she will perform better than you are expecting. She's attractive and well spoken, and also is willing to play the populist card harder than most Dems, despite such a middling voting record. From what I know about her, voting record might not accurately represent where she is on the spectrum. I.e., she's more progressive on issues than a typical Dem but more conservative on others, almost like some libertarian qualities, so the left-right spectrum applied to her is a bit weird.

Also part of why she triggers this forum is her Greenwald-esque approach to the Russia thing, and if all the Dem candiates are trying to out Russia each other and she's focusing populist policies it can put her more in the spotlight.

idk, she probably gets relegated to the junior varsity debate if the field winds up being as large as the 2016 Republican field.

Stage 1:
Warren
Harris
Sanders
Beto
Gillibrand
Booker
Biden

???:
Inslee
Castro

Stage 2:
Delaney
Gabbard
Ojeda

I guess Inslee is a governor but all I know about him is that he wants to make climate change his signature issue despite the carbon tax in WA failing in the midterms

Shout out to the New Yorker legitimizing her with a growing profile a few years ago

She sucks

The bolded is exactly why I'm struggling to see her do well. What is the profile of her fan base?

She's pretty hot. And young.

wheatrich is a Republican? If so, I'll stop being slightly shocked by his racist fears that without border controls most of the people crossing the border would be gang members.