Quote:
Originally Posted by bacalaopeace
Mainstream America is quite far right, Clinton right even, and would not have turned out for Sanders.
Think this was already responded to but it keeps coming up - you're wrong, you've been brainwashed by the mainstream and/or conservative media. Left policies are wildly popular.
https://prospect.org/article/most-am...80%99t-know-it
That's why those of us far to the left want candidates who boldly shout clear socialist policies. People like those policies if they're easy to understand. Clinton never made anything clear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
Our number one goal at this point is getting control of the senate and the presidency so we can protect the supreme court.
Young Turks running videos on Beto being a fraud is really counter productive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
The biggest issue right now is supreme court seats. Im scared if Bernie/Warren run and lose that it is game over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
If you think Bernie has the best chance of winning then go with him, but not selecting the candidate that has the best chance of winning in the next election seems pretty crazy when RGB has had cancer like 5 times and is breaking ribs at 85 years old and somehow didn't retire during Obama's first term.
If Trump replaces a liberal supreme court justice with another sociopath, like that dumb Christian ***** that has 7 kids, we can basically close this forum and all move to Europe because it will be over at that point and elections won't matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
It's bitter sweet that we are discussing candidates stances on medicare-for-all when we are one supreme court geriatric death away from elections not mattering.
If you think the best way to combat this is to play terrified defense by meekly nominating Biden/Beto you're out of your ****ing mind.
(And cut out the concern trolling about anti-Beto videos. Did you have anything to say about the corporate Democrat ****s who've been screaming "#NeverBernie" for the last 2 years?)
You are in many ways correct about the Supreme Court (and the Senate which you didn't mention), and in fact it's already lost. That's why it's vital that we fight, hard, and pick politicians who are going to fight hard and aggressively and "dirty".
This hasn't been on the table much by mainstream politicians, but if we ever take back the Senate and if at that time the SC is still a problem, we pack it with ~4 new far left judges (and/or work towards neutering/eliminating the institution entirely). We do the same with statehood for PR (if they want it), DC, possibly splitting CA, etc. (and work towards eliminating the Senate entirely). Vastly increasing the number of Representatives will probably be good as well and might help mitigate the Electoral College problem.
In general though, there needs to be somebody in there who's a fighter and will hammer the Republicans/SC if they don't fall in line. The House should, right now, be aggressively passing popular progressive bills and then scream about how the Republican Senate is being "obstructionist". They'll either bend to our will or they'll be swept out.
It might need to go more grassroots than this though. If, for example, they passed and signed Medicare for All and the SC struck it down (let's say packing the court isn't doable), we the people would have to get out into the ****ing streets, in DC and everywhere else, and not let business happen for as long as it takes. Should have happened after Bush v. Gore.
If you're going to treat politics solely as a thing we do once every 2 years in the voting booth then we're in trouble, but at the very least then pull the lever for people who are going to fight these battles the way they need to be fought. And who are going to inspire people to vote for them, and inspire people to get out into the ****ing streets if necessary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
The Supreme Court tried to stop the new deal as well until FDR threatened to increase the size of the court until he had a majority. I don't remember full details now, but is there any reason that couldn't work nowadays if the democrats held the majority of elected offices again?
Yea there was a "flip in time to save 9" or w/e where one of the judges flipped on a key decision so that they would avoid having multiple new justices added. That's the power of pressure, whether it's from the President or from we the people.