I like her. People who say she is not charismatic have never really seen her in her element imo. Strongest candidate on economic issues. Progressive but compared to Bernie she seems less irritatingly strident and more empathetic. By far the strongest female in the race in a year when a lot of people want to see a woman win. Very undervalued right now on Predictit, she is a top tier candidate and will start gaining serious traction once the debates start.

Whoops.

If Beto took some time and actually studied up on issues and met with experts and policy wonks and formulated a coherent ideology he would be a strong contender for the nomination. Right now he just seems like a guy who loves driving around, giving speeches and talking to people.

I guess the difference between the Republicans and Democrats is all the not serious Republicans who are running for president all have some kind of grift to fall back on, whether it's a book, tv/radio show, some company they lobby for, etc. Beto just enjoys the attention I think.

The best part is Trump retweeting it HAHAHA!

he also likes standing on tables and countertops

i wish this primary was bernie vs warren vs buttigieg and that's it (left vs center vs right)

Warren has analogies for everything to help explain her views and positions

Think of _________ like __________

I like it.

the dem debates are going to be amazing.

I don't think the debates will be that great. 10 people will be on stage so everyone gets to give their 30 second soundbite. And there's no Trump to attack people or stir things up.

I wasn't a huge fan before, but she's really caught my attention tonight. Fantastic job here, imo.

Faith question is ridiculous

But somehow she hit it out of the park.

That escalated quickly

Mayor Pete is your avatar for the "right"? Not Biden/Beto??

He could well be auditioning for a future MSNBC gig right now.

he seems like the best option of the right candidates, yes

Biden and Beto are both miserable options and below Harris, Gillibrand, and Booker for sure

have you looked at Pete's platform? Where are you getting that he's not progressive?

Warren CNN Townhall questions

White supremacists have become more emboldened; what are your plans to unite the country?

How would your administration publicly apologize to the African-American community for slavery?

Can you explain how "Medicare for All" would be better for workers than simply improving the ACA?

How did your familiy's financial problems during your childhood shape who you are today?

What will you do to control immigration?

How will you lower rents to help those who are struggling to find affordable housing?

How do you respond to those who think your handling of your Native American heritage was tone deaf?

How will you expand voting rights to the formerly incarcerated, ensure online voter registration and no-excuse early voting?

What is your position on impeaching Trump?

How would you improve the education system and also make it fair to all Americans?

What role does faith play in your life?

Sanders CNN Townhall questions

How will you defeat Trump if you're the Democratic nominee and will you help defeat him if someone else is nominated?

How would you pay for your ambitious policy ideals?

Do you think you'll get a fair shake in the Democratic nominating process given your history as an Indepentent?

When will you release your taxes?

Can you make a simple, persuasive case why socialism is preferable to capitalism?

How can Democratic voters be confident in you given your response to sexual harassment claims in your 2016 campaign?

If you're on the debate stage with Donald Trump, how will you engage with him?

Would Americans who like their private insurance be able to keep it under your "M4A" plan?

As president, would you meet with North Korea's dictator Kim Jong Un?

How do you address African-American voters' concern about you?

Why have you stopped short of calling Venezuela's Maduro a dictator?

What would you do to help Washington DC voters get representation in Congress?

But it would be only one case at a time. So for any given case there's just as much chance it would be heard by three liberals as it would be for three cons.

Really? It’s gonna be a clownshow with a dozen people trying to get in the zinger that gets the most tweets.

dinopoker,

Is it three hardcore idealogue conservatives vs. three comprising reach-across-aisle bipartisan liberals?

Lots of gun owners in western PA.

I dunno, I came up with it while drunk. I suppose if it's random then it could be any of the above.

Crazy how the notion that the judges actually be impartial isn't even in the discussion though.

That's because we have precedent.

Nate has been an absolutely shameless Beto stan