Good Romney read about his HBS days.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/25/us...ef=todayspaper

My newspaper said Romney is crushing New Hampshire with Ron Paul close behind.

I dunno what that means but Ron Paul seems to be doing well.

lol ya wtf does that mean.

Silver is projecting Romney to take 37 percent of the vote in NH, Paul in second with 20 percent.

You are living in a fantasy world, not the real one. If Obama gets voted out next year history will record him somewhere below Jimmy Carter based on accomplishments.

No.

The 7 dwarfs were the 1988 DEMOCRATIC candidates...
Which produced the Juggernaut that was Michael Dukakis.

George HW Bush could hardly be considered a "dwarve".

From avatar you may be a "dwarve" yourself...
Nothing personal.

http://www.ealmanac.com/1651/numbers...ntial-primary/

Damn you Redman you ruined a good story. No offense taken.

Obama is much better at spinning the news than the GOP.

We havent had a president of historical deeds since Nixon. And, he screwed the pooch on that legacy. We haven't had one revered since FDR. I doubt history will stop much on the deeds of the whole lineup from Ford-Obama as his presidency stands. I think they will all get the criticism of mismanaging prosperity and strength. It reminds me a bit of Gilded Age presidents. A bunch of little dwarves forgotten in a few generations.

I think his point is that he's simply looking at the results, which he would find to be those of an excellent president if Obamacare was killed. You're reading too much into this.

FYP

A tip of the hat to Grover Cleveland might be in order.

You're the one who is obsessed with his use of the word excellent. I really don't care either way other than that I think you're being a semantics nit.

Nice deflection, like most others that keep using lines similar to this I assume you don't want to put any money where your mouth is? Pigs flying is near 0% chance so I will put my 100$ on Paul being Republican nominee to your 10,000$ on Paul not being Republican nominee? Or you could continue to troll on internet forums, that's cool too.

I am not so sure that he would attack Paul on the newsletters. I know it was a different scenario in 2008 but he didn't attack McCain on anything other than policy in 08 right? Saw him doing an interview the other night where the reporter tried to bait him into commenting on republican personal baggage and he wasn't falling for it. I'm not saying that will translate into him not attacking the other candidate on personal issues, but I am not as convinced that this would come into play during the debates etc.

Lol wraths, why would they take that when rp fans push his chances to laughable levels on intrade? He's a massive, massive dog to win.

Wrath's, I don't think the newsletter's would be much of a debate issue more of a Superpac ad campaign. Obama prolly throws down a little snark at the little old man "Of course Ron I am awfully fleet of foot" or some other line.
But who knows in some bizzaro world where Paul is debating Obama.

I'm not saying he's not a massive dog to win. I'm saying that it's trolling to sit there and say he's 0% to win if you don't really believe that. If you do believe that then taking 100:1 would be +ev.

Perhaps, I'm not sure if he would or not. Hard to speculate on such a longshot chance but id lean more towards he doesn't make that remark.

Taking the Intrade line would be more +EV.

opportunity cost, learn it.

Don't talk during a hand.

Then he should have bought up all the not republican primary shares of RP on intrade?

Yeah, if he has unlimited money he probably should do that.

Or he could stop saying asinine statements that are nonfactual?