Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee? Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee?

12-04-2011 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
If Wilson and FDR were so intelligent how come they had such terrible policies?
Well your negative opinion of their political beliefs does not automatically mean they are stupid.

LKJ, Bush Sr. may be smarter than FDR, but he's the only other contender (maybe Obama or Taft I guess).
12-04-2011 , 01:49 PM
Bush Sr. was the one who came to mind. I was going to question Taft being 20th century, but I see you're right.
12-04-2011 , 01:53 PM
Here is a study that estimates the IQ's of the Presidents. Jefferson is considered to be far and way the most intelligent.

http://www.ahealthymind.org/ans/libr...%20IQ%2006.pdf
12-04-2011 , 01:57 PM
That study rates Harding as the biggest knuckle-dragger as well. Not surprised Grant was down there near the bottom.
12-04-2011 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LKJ
You picked them out for that reason but left Carter alone...?
well it's always easier to just blame the current office holder, rather than place those actions in context of real world events in play.

I surmise the reason many go into economics is the complete separation from reality that can be created. It is the ultimate, assert your way to victory, with a scientific moniker attached.
12-04-2011 , 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Here is a study that estimates the IQ's of the Presidents. Jefferson is considered to be far and way the most intelligent.

http://www.ahealthymind.org/ans/libr...%20IQ%2006.pdf
Am I reading it wrong? It looks like John Quincy Adams scored even higher than Jefferson.
12-04-2011 , 02:20 PM
Chairman of the RNC on meet the press this morning to answer zero questions and simply repeat 'anything to defeat Obama’. Thanks for showing up dude.

His party's really got nuttin else do they?

lol
12-04-2011 , 02:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vecernicek
I can understand the hope Repub partisans are putting into Newt. Compared to the dreck he shares the stage with, he really does come off as incredibly intelligent and effectively articulate.
A wee bit myopic, are we? Romney is 'dreck' in any sort of way? Bright, supremely educated and ridiculously accomplished, this guy has been an enormous success in the private sector and is skillful enough as a politician to get elected as a Mormon in the most left leaning uber Catholic state in the nation.

Newt.... he only singlehandedly engineered a coup in the House , overturning the multidecade vice grip the dems of Tip O'neil/Jim Wright had over the house. He then pragmatically dealt with Clinton to shrink welfare and balance the budget. Newt may lead a questionable (certainly not by Clinton-esque standards) personal life, but as a conservative, yet pragmatic politician, he's quite formidable.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Vecernicek
What's being ignored, though, is that he is immensely unlikeable. I realize that the hard-core Right has some strange belief that the rest of America shares their view that Obama is the AntiChrist. But in fact, Obama is still very well-liked
It is pretty clear, his policies and their results are fairly widely unliked:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...oval-1044.html

This mindless meme that the right views him as the Antichrist is pretty funny. While I am quite sure there are some that view him that way (just as there were some lefty wing nuts that viewed Bush in that fashion) and speaking only for myself, I loath his political philosophy, not the person.

His over reaching principle is the world is unjust and the function of government is to spread the wealth around. He isn't the Antichrist, merely what would be called a Euro-styled socialist. He'd make a wonderful king of Sweden. Didn't they vote him the Nobel Prize after like 5 minutes in office?

The guy reeks it out of every pore. And don't take my word for it... from Dreams from my Father pg. 55-56:

Quote:

CHAPTER SEVEN

… And so, in the months leading up to graduation, I wrote to every civil rights organization I could think of, to any black elected official in the country with a progressive agenda, to neighborhood councils and tenant rights groups. When no one wrote back, I wasn’t discouraged. I decided to find more conventional work for a year, to pay off my student loans and maybe even save a little bit. I would need the money later, I told myself. Organizers didn’t make any money; their poverty was proof of their integrity.

Eventually a consulting house to multinational corporations agreed to hire me as a research assistant. Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office and sat at my computer terminal, checking the Reuters machine that blinked bright emerald messages from across the globe. As far as I could tell I was the only black man in the company, a source of shame for me but a source of considerable pride for the company’s secretarial pool. They treated me like a son, those black ladies; they told me how they expected me to run the company one day…

So the leader of the free world in the few months he worked in the capitalist private sector felt himself like a ****ing spy behind enemy lines!

I couldn't have made my case any more eloquently, myself.

That is why many on the right don't like his policies. It isn't because he is half white/half black. It is because his overreaching ambition is to turn America into a Euro-socialist utopia. I understand why the cheese eaters think that's great, but an awful lot in the middle and right aren't looking for overarching change to the society.
12-04-2011 , 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
Am I reading it wrong? It looks like John Quincy Adams scored even higher than Jefferson.
I looked at the first column "intellectual brilliance" where his Z score was the highest. But you are correct some of the other columns indicate John Q as the smartest. Not sure column is considered by the writers as best cause I am too lazy to reread the study.
So, in summary, Erik is correct and I am wrong. The casual readers of this subforum probably already concluded that to be true.
12-04-2011 , 02:38 PM
Reince Pribus.

"Hey honey I was thinking of some baby names what do you think of Jeffery, Jonathan or Jason? Yeah, your right Reince is the best one."
12-04-2011 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikTheDread
Am I reading it wrong? It looks like John Quincy Adams scored even higher than Jefferson.
John Quincy Adams was a ****ing genius. End of story. That, and probably the finest statesman in the field of foreign affairs, ever.
12-04-2011 , 02:50 PM
JFK way too high in that survey, Nixon and Carter too low. Looks like that has JFK as the second smartest president ever. I find that really hard to believe.
12-04-2011 , 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Newt had energy and excitement? It's not long ago we were loling at him for trips to Hawaii and for losing his entire staff. Energy!
compared to tim pawlenty and mitt romney? yes

he's not throwing red meat around everywhere, but he's bombastic and interesting.
12-04-2011 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starkwired
JFK way too high in that survey, Nixon and Carter too low. Looks like that has JFK as the second smartest president ever. I find that really hard to believe.
Study was done by Ted Sorensen and Theodore White

They took the IQ test for him, too.
12-04-2011 , 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
Classic Ikes. I coulda pulled a bunch of posts out, but i never said Obama was world class at debates at all.



There is an entire offshoot itt about whether Obama is a good debate based literally on a strawman. Someone else put it well, the format of the "debates" is such that its pretty close to impossible to truly win - at least on content.

The GOP House Issues Conference which someone linked with Obama crushing the GOP questioners is a closer representation of actual debates.

The reason the comparisons to Hilldog and McCain is silly is because Hilldog was generally pretty awesome and McCain was a war vet who hadnt truly gone off the deepend at that point. Newt is a complete douchebag. The idea that Obama "lost" the debates is missing that the story of the McCain debates was him wandering around aimlessly looking like he was half senile. The story of Obama debating Newt is going to be some fat douchebag insulting the POTUS who is acting like a gentleman and covering every point he makes as he has lived these policies for four years. He might even get out the professor voice and deliver a "look, Newt, i know you want to just argue, but lets talk about the issues and be civil like the people want". He is an instantly likeable person, that is why he won in 2008 and its why he would do fine with Newt in these debates.
Phil, your statement most definitely says that obama is world class at presidential debates. Sorry dude.
12-04-2011 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by swinginglory
some stuff
yeah, I don't think you understood my post
12-04-2011 , 03:48 PM
Paul is polling well on electability contrary to my belief that he would under perform. Two polls released by Marist suggest Paul is more electable in both Iowa and New Hampshire (states that are up for grabs) then Gingrich. And more electable in Iowa then both romney and Gingrich.
12-04-2011 , 03:50 PM
Most of the country has no idea about Paul's sources of un-electability.
12-04-2011 , 04:00 PM
12-04-2011 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Phil, your statement most definitely says that obama is world class at presidential debates. Sorry dude.
No, i said Obama is world class at being likeable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
Newt being a "great debater" assumes presidential "debates" are actually "debates". They arent. Its a stream of short soundbites prepracticed and preprepared on specific subjects that will come up. Its a question of likeability whilst delivering these soundbites which is key, something Obama is entirely world class at, and something Newt is completely 100% terrible at.
12-04-2011 , 04:03 PM
BEING A GREAT DEBATOR IS A QUESTION OF LIKEABILITY WHILE DELIVERING THESE SOUNDBITES, SOMETHING OBAMA IS WORLD CLASS AT = OBAMA IS WORLD CLASS AT PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES.
12-04-2011 , 04:04 PM
You say:

1) Presidential debates aren't debates
2) PD's are about coming up with soundbites and being likable
3) Obama is world class at coming up with soundbites and being likable

Therefore you are saying Obama is world class at PDs. He hasn't been.
12-04-2011 , 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
BEING A GREAT DEBATOR IS A QUESTION OF LIKEABILITY WHILE DELIVERING THESE SOUNDBITES, SOMETHING OBAMA IS WORLD CLASS AT = OBAMA IS WORLD CLASS AT PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES.
lol damn my pony.
12-04-2011 , 04:08 PM
your pony is less angry than mine tho
12-04-2011 , 04:08 PM
Why are we still talking about Obama's debate performances? They weren't great, but they were good enough.

As long as you're not Rick Perry out there, mediocre performances don't hurt that much.

      
m