Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
I think you have some valid opinions here. I mean, were Hilary in the WH, we'd be having the discussion on if the Rs were really sexist.
They just hate anyone with a D in front of their name. I think maybe Rs just equally have ambivalence towards anyone who isn't rich, and that that group includes many a black person may just be incidental to a degree. That their policies don't aim to help black people may just be an unintended consequence, but it also leads very few black people to want to join the R party, so it's easy to view them as exclusionary. (also, attacks on the civil rights movement, lo over a half decade later, don't help them appear any less racist)
this is essentially it. I'm pretty sure if u came up with a solution that would fix the economy 98% of the time before the next election...a huge chunk of Reps would not support it and argue about the 2% of the time it doesn't work. The catch is that if the Dems were in the Republican's shoes...they would do the exact same thing. Neither side actually cares about helping the middle class, poor people, average joes etc or fixing the economy unless it improves their own interests. They care about getting re-elected, getting more power, and thus getting wealthier long term.
The race issue is much less important except with a small % of the older voters and just pure rednecks of the Rep party. IMO the isn't "proud" of America or patriotic issue is a much much bigger influence with people who hate Obama on the Republican/Indep side of things.
Romney should win unless the UE % suddenly starts shedding points over the last 6 months before the election.