Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I know you know the answer to this question, right? It lets them run to the internet with their Islam hot takes.
Obviously. Sometimes I don't remember all the characters in the forum and if I'm talking to a well-meaning person or a hopeless bigot type. So the open-ended question is a sign that I'm not going to assume the worst.
But yes: the whole purpose of maximizing the number of incidents they can fold into the Global Radical Islamism Fascism War on the West and All the Values We Hold Dear is for the propaganda value of what they really want, which is more war and immigration restrictions.
If only the truly coordinated and planned terrorist attacks like 9/11 and Bataclan qualified, then they imagine the folks will get bored and docile. By including every violent Muslim idiot and every social ill in the Middle East ("they're mean to gays! They tolerate sexual assault against women!") as ersatz terrorism and part of the existential threat to our lives, then they imagine they can frighten everyone into whatever highly aggressive and repressive stuff they have rattling around in their brains.