Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
I don't know what actually happened. If I had to guess, Miller and Sessions wanted this, Miller pitched it and Trump thought it sounded good. The Dems should take note, though they won't and they'll start with a compromise.
Oops, there I go talking like the Dems actually want those things.
Well Trump and the Conservative legislation both call for asylum seekers and others to be detained until their case is resolved. Basically ending 'catch and release', which is what Trump is proposing with his executive order. Since forever the government has had the option to detain or release asylum seekers, but they've had to release children, except unaccompanied minors, because of the Flores decision. So previous administrations released asylum seekers to be with their kids and released accompanied minors to be with their extended family if they had one. Trump and Miller took the nuclear option that claimed that all call asylum claims would be initially prosecuted and all children would then be reclassified as unaccompanied minors. That allowed the government to detain children indefinitely while their parents have their cases resolved. Trump's proposing the same thing, but keeping the kids and family together in detention until the case is resolved. That's different than what happened before, but since the alternative is draconian, Trump's hoping it'll be seen as the humanitarian option.
The next step will be someone challenging Trump's EO on the Flores settlement, forcing him to release children to their extended families. Basically basic to the pre-tender age concentration camp Trump status quo.
Edit: Yep
Last edited by Huehuecoyotl; 06-20-2018 at 03:15 PM.