Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The TSA - Fondling your junk, for nothing: Epic Search Fail The TSA - Fondling your junk, for nothing: Epic Search Fail

11-23-2010 , 08:35 PM
Whoa crazy, in related news did you guys see that Obama won the Nobel Prize AGAIN this year. Must be because he's keeping America so safe these days with all the groping.

http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/?c=117&a=2519
11-23-2010 , 08:35 PM
Quote:
"What do you want to do, get blown up by a goddamn Arab at 30,000 feet or we get to see your private parts? It's up to you, the ball's in your park," head of the TSA's scanning department, Rodney Schroeder, told CNN.
LOL

Damned slow pony ninja edit 27
11-23-2010 , 08:38 PM
WE've been tinyurled!
11-23-2010 , 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
The better quote in that article was the "O face" describing the scanner operator as he masterbated to young girls walking through the scanner.
11-23-2010 , 08:50 PM
That article is how rumors get started.

NEXT ON FOX - TSA CHIEF SAYS GET MOLESTED OR DIE
11-23-2010 , 08:57 PM
who pats down the tsa officers?
11-23-2010 , 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE

Drudgesiren.gif

Have now gone through security for the fourth time in nine days. Once again no issues.

This is getting boring.
I hate to break this to you, but maybe you aren't floating the TSA agents boat if you know what I mean.
11-23-2010 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
lol you might want to learn what a knife is though.

razors are knives.
Oops. I guess I meant razors, but really, that's just nittery since...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQhBfRDd6GM
11-23-2010 , 11:12 PM
"What do you want to do, get blown up by a goddamn Arab at 30,000 feet or we get to see your private parts? It's up to you, the ball's in your park," head of the TSA's scanning department, Rodney Schroeder, told CNN.


This statement would get you temp banned or at the minimum infracted by some mods on 2p2...

Last edited by CRUDEFINDER; 11-23-2010 at 11:15 PM. Reason: Which is not a bad thing,so I actually can't believe he said it
11-23-2010 , 11:24 PM
lol this is fantastic
11-23-2010 , 11:25 PM
It really is.
11-23-2010 , 11:27 PM
Did I get leveled? FML

But I do find it funny that an attorney would take such an apathetic attitude toward something so obviously against the grain of the fourth ammendment.

Last edited by CRUDEFINDER; 11-23-2010 at 11:32 PM.
11-23-2010 , 11:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
Lol. Dude the scanner and the magnetometer at that security station are literally right next to each other. If you didn't want to be scanned you took a single step to the left and no one said boo. In fact the TSA guy was prompting some people to do just that since the throughput on the magnetometer is greater.
This really ought to be a joke, but I'm guessing it's not. TSA FTL.
11-23-2010 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
K, Elliot. No one gives a **** about your experiment anyways. I mean, I haven't finished my STAT class yet, but I'm PRETTY sure a sample size of 6 compared to the total of 18 million flights a year, is slightly insignificant. Whatever point you think you're making is absolutely lost on me. According to some USA today article I saw today, a large portion of Americans are against the scanners.
I can't love this post enough. Soooooooooo much win.
11-23-2010 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
This really ought to be a joke, but I'm guessing it's not. TSA FTL.
Oh it gets better. On this trip to vegas the stations similarly had body scanners and magnetometers set up side by side. But the scanners were not in use at all. lol.
11-23-2010 , 11:37 PM
I would run one for free.
NSFW
Spoiler:


11-23-2010 , 11:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRUDEFINDER
I would run one for free.
NSFW
Spoiler:


They actually make you put your hands together behind your head. I think it makes the breasts more prominent.
11-23-2010 , 11:40 PM
From the New Yorker Magazine,


Ed Fisher, September 2, 1972:


Frank Modell, January 27, 1973:
11-23-2010 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
I can't love this post enough. Soooooooooo much win.
11-23-2010 , 11:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobman0330
This really ought to be a joke, but I'm guessing it's not. TSA FTL.
Its not like the list of airports that have these screeners is classified information. I would hope at least that the terrorists would be smart enough just to go to a city that doesn't have them so it should hardly matter if you can just change lines.

When Phoenix first got them it was only at one terminal even....ok, instead of blowing up a Southwest flight just pick Continental. Ez game.
11-24-2010 , 12:03 AM
not sure if this was posted, but Napolitano is talking trains, subways, etc

http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...and-the-metro-

Quote:
“[Terrorists] are going to continue to probe the system and try to find a way through,” Napolitano said in an interview that aired Monday night on "Charlie Rose."

“I think the tighter we get on aviation, we have to also be thinking now about going on to mass transit or to trains or maritime. So, what do we need to be doing to strengthen our protections there?”
its a total dehumanization project they're working on

*I think its pretty audacious that in the midst of all this controversy, that Napolitano would say that trains/etc are next. But I guess I shouldn't be too surprised. They'll roll them out slowly in places outside of airports of course just like they've been doing within airports.

Last edited by Luckbox Inc; 11-24-2010 at 12:25 AM.
11-24-2010 , 12:48 AM
Not really. Operationally terrorists were going for grand political gestures by taking down airplanes. Now that has become more difficult ( or diminishing returns) they will go after easier less politically stunning targets like malls, trains, etc. The Bombay scenario will be the prototype for future manned attacks and unmanned attacks will be like the bomb in printer scenario.
11-24-2010 , 12:49 AM
Ok back top reality. This is an awesome tale, though still ridiculous.
11-24-2010 , 12:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
Ok back top reality. This is an awesome tale, though still ridiculous.
Interesting story.

I look forward to the lawsuit after he's placed on the "No-Fly" list...
11-24-2010 , 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Not really. Operationally terrorists were going for grand political gestures by taking down airplanes. Now that has become more difficult ( or diminishing returns) they will go after easier less politically stunning targets like malls, trains, etc. The Bombay scenario will be the prototype for future manned attacks and unmanned attacks will be like the bomb in printer scenario.
I'm a little confused about this. You're saying you think DHS is justified in thinking about using scanners is places outside of airports?

      
m