Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The TSA - Fondling your junk, for nothing: Epic Search Fail The TSA - Fondling your junk, for nothing: Epic Search Fail

11-19-2010 , 11:20 AM
Nate's got an article up on TSA screening. From the last time security measures were tightened:

Quote:
Other passengers may substitute car travel for air travel. But this too has its consequences, since car travel is much more dangerous than air travel over all. According to the Cornell study, roughly 130 inconvenienced travelers died every three months as a result of additional traffic fatalities brought on by substituting ground transit for air transit. That’s the equivalent of four fully-loaded Boeing 737s crashing each year.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...port-security/

http://aem.cornell.edu/faculty_sites...p/JLE_6301.pdf
11-19-2010 , 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Really good article.
Really?!
Here is a quote from the article (http://www.popehat.com/2010/11/12/gr...it-the-road/):



“He started at one leg and then ran his hand up to my crotch. He cupped and patted my crotch with his palm. Other flyers were watching this happen to me. At that point I closed my eyes and started praying to the Goddess for strength. He also cupped and then squeezed my breasts. That wasn’t the worst part. He touched my face, he touched my hair, stroking me. That’s when I started crying. It was so intimate, so horrible. I feel like I was being raped. There’s no way I can fly again. I can’t do it.”

correct me if I'm wrong, however, I do believe women are patted down by women.
11-19-2010 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
...and how many hundreds of thousands of hours wasted by people in these lines.



I've been pondering this way too much lately, but these stories I read from men, women, pilots, & parents really enrage me over and over again. Every god damned time a person is pulled from the line there should have to be documentation made stating exactly why they were pulled, by whom, and what the result was.
So, we Americans have drawn the line when it comes to the fight against terrorism! And that line is: our waistline!!

And you're not alone!!

What I believe really defines the self-righteous attitudes of Americans, is that this issue can become such a highly contested issue, receiving hours of airplay, while we remain mute about the fact that our drones kill innocent civilians, including children, every month.
11-19-2010 , 12:47 PM
Generalizing americans as a whole is maybe the most gauche thing you could do on 2+2 and in general.
11-19-2010 , 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
Generalizing americans as a whole is maybe the most gauche thing you could do on 2+2 and in general.
Maybe.....but if the Tea Party can get organize & demonstrate in mass.

If Jon Stewart can organize in mass to promote "A return to sanity"

How come all those Americans against those drones killing innocent civilians haven't organized in mass?

I think it's fair to say they've remained mute, compared to others pressing their agendas.
11-19-2010 , 12:56 PM
EN MASSE!



and i'm certainly not defending it, but what happens to those civilians when the drones leave? personally, i'd like to see the us pull most everything back stateside and start fixing ourselves for a change, but the sad truth is war is good for business and oil only greases the war machine more.
11-19-2010 , 12:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
EN MASSE!
I'm not a fan of the French
11-19-2010 , 01:02 PM
obv
11-19-2010 , 01:14 PM
11-19-2010 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
EN MASSE!



and i'm certainly not defending it, but what happens to those civilians when the drones leave? personally, i'd like to see the us pull most everything back stateside and start fixing ourselves for a change, but the sad truth is war is good for business and oil only greases the war machine more.
Good for what business? The banks that loan us the money & the companies that make the guns & bullets?

I guess that's why the 5 permanent members of the U.N. Security Council are the 5 largest gun runners in the world.
11-19-2010 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtzChips
Maybe.....but if the Tea Party can get organize & demonstrate in mass.

If Jon Stewart can organize in mass to promote "A return to sanity"

How come all those Americans against those drones killing innocent civilians haven't organized in mass?

I think it's fair to say they've remained mute, compared to others pressing their agendas.
Ah yes. The ol' "Because there's some greater injustice in the world, you're not allowed to protest this injustice" argument. Brool story co.
11-19-2010 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Ah yes. The ol' "Because there's some greater injustice in the world, you're not allowed to protest this injustice" argument. Brool story co.
No Mr. Wookie.......but I give you credit for being able to spin my position as well as any politician. You da man!
11-19-2010 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtzChips
Good for what business? The banks that loan us the money & the companies that make the guns & bullets?

I guess that's why the 5 permanent members of the U.N. Security Council are the 5 largest gun runners in the world.

yes
11-19-2010 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
personally, i'd like to see the us pull most everything back stateside and start fixing ourselves for a change, but the sad truth is war is good for business and oil only greases the war machine more.
IDK when you started posting in politards, but gj!
11-19-2010 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
yes
Ok......well in the name of biz.......that's why we've spent all those millions on x ray machines for the airports........

So, if we can accept a few civilians, we never knew, as collateral damage, in the name of "good for biz"......what's wrong with a little xray & patdown on this side of the pond to promote biz?
11-19-2010 , 01:34 PM
HE SAID HE WASN'T DEFENDING IT JESUS UTZ
11-19-2010 , 01:35 PM
this is one of my favorite lyrics and it applies to this TSA bs:

Quote:
Bushleauger-Pearl Jam

How does he do it? How do they do it? Uncanny and immutable.
This is such a happening tailpipe of a party.
Like sugar, the guests are so refined, (look like melting mice)

A confidence man, but why so beleaguered?
He's not a leader, he's a Texas leaguer
Swinging for the fence, got lucky with a strike
Drilling for fear, makes the job simple
Born on third, thinks he got a triple

Blackout weaves it's way through the cities
Blackout weaves it's way through the cities
Blackout weaves it's way,...

I remember when you sang
That song about today
Now it's tomorrow and
Everything has changed

A think tank of aloof multiplication
A nicotine wish and a columbus decanter
Retrenchment and hoggishness
The aristocrat choir sings
"What's the ruckus?"
The haves have not a clue
The immenseness of suffering
And the odd negotiation, a rarity
With onionskin plausibility of life,
And a keyboard reaffirmation

11-19-2010 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtzChips
Ok......well in the name of biz.......that's why we've spent all those millions on x ray machines for the airports........

So, if we can accept a few civilians, we never knew, as collateral damage, in the name of "good for biz"......what's wrong with a little xray & patdown on this side of the pond to promote biz?
nothing obv. the guy who ran the TSA suggested we need these devices and then left the TSA and now has a partnership with the manufacturer of these devises. through his lobby group.

now i hate all that and it sucks, but our system is too broken and corrupt at this point. i firmly believe the decline of this empire has begun and if you think about it that's quite a flameout at 300 years.
11-19-2010 , 01:43 PM
For you Thanksgiving travels

Quote:
Airports that currently have imaging technology, according to the website:

• Albuquerque International Sunport Airport
• Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
• Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport
• Boston Logan International Airport
• Houston's George Bush Interncontinental Airport
• Boise Airport
• Bradley International Airport
• Brownsville-South Padre Island Airport
• Buffalo Niagara International Airport
• Charlotte Douglas International Airport
• Chicago's O'Hare International Airport
• Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport
• Cleveland Hopkins International Airport
• Corpus Christi International Airport
• Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
• Denver International Airport
• Detroit Metro Airport
• Dulles International Airport
• El Paso International Airport
• Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport
• Fort Wayne International Airport
• Fresno Yosemite International Airport
• Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport
• Grand Rapids, Michigan's Gerald R. Ford International Airport
• Harrisburg International Airport
• Valley International Airport in Harlingen, Texas
• Honolulu International Airport
• Indianapolis International Airport
• Jacksonville International Airport
• John F. Kennedy International Airport
• Kansas City International Airport
• LaGuardia Airport
• Lambert-St. Louis International Airport
• Laredo International Airport
• Lihue Airport
• Los Angeles International Airport
• San Juan Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport
• McAllen-Miller International Airport
• Las Vegas' McCarran International Airport
• Memphis International Airport
• Miami International Airport
• Milwaukee's General Mitchell Airport
• Mineta San José International Airport
• Minneapolis/St.Paul International Airport
• Nashville International Airport
• Newark Liberty International Airport
• Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport
• Oakland International Airport
• Omaha Eppley Field Airport
• Orlando International Airport
• Palm Beach International Airport
• Philadelphia International Airport
• Phoenix International Airport
• Pittsburgh International Airport
• Port Columbus International Airport
• Raleigh-Durham International Airport
• Richmond International Airport
• Greater Rochester International Airport
• Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport
• Salt Lake City International Airport
• San Antonio International Airport
• San Diego International Airport
• San Francisco International Airport
• Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
• Spokane International Airport
• T.F. Green Airport
• Tampa International Airport
• Tulsa International Airport
11-19-2010 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtzChips
Maybe.....but if the Tea Party can get organize & demonstrate in mass.

If Jon Stewart can organize in mass to promote "A return to sanity"

How come all those Americans against those drones killing innocent civilians haven't organized in mass?

I think it's fair to say they've remained mute, compared to others pressing their agendas.
You are right. There has not been a single protest against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Americans are a bunch of hypocrites.
11-19-2010 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
HE SAID HE WASN'T DEFENDING IT JESUS UTZ
I know......However.........as 27offsuit so eliquently stated: "the sad truth is that war is good for business."

So, I can understand why millions were spent on the xray machines and hiring of all those TSA agents.........it's good for biz.

The War on Terror is good for biz.

So, if there has been no demonstrations, like during the Vietnam Conflict, over the killing of innocent civilians, shouldn't we do our part, in the name of "good for biz" and accept a grope or two?

The Military Industrial Complex has finally obtained what they've been praying for........a war that will never end.........until we go broke......and then they, the banks & the countries that bought our bonds, will have all the money.
11-19-2010 , 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27offsuit
nothing obv. the guy who ran the TSA suggested we need these devices and then left the TSA and now has a partnership with the manufacturer of these devises. through his lobby group.

now i hate all that and it sucks, but our system is too broken and corrupt at this point. i firmly believe the decline of this empire has begun and if you think about it that's quite a flameout at 300 years.
I agree with you and have pretty much given up also.
However.......
Someone once said:
"A democracy gets the leadership it deserves."

Which I take as meaning: The less you participate in your political process in mass, or "en masse" as those who like the French would say, the less you deserve a government you wish you had.

What I found most interesting, was a poll I saw on t.v. a few weeks ago, so I don't have the accurate numbers, but the following is pretty damn close:

25-30% approved of the job Congress was doing, while 50% of those same people polled, approved of the job their representive representative was doing.
11-19-2010 , 02:01 PM
I can't get the damn wikipedia site to come up, even if I just type in wikipedia.org, however, I'll keep trying.

I guess these protests either don't get much of any press coverage, or I am reading/watching the wrong news outlets.
11-19-2010 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UtzChips
.....a war that will never end....

This is so true. It scares the crap out of me whenever some government agency like the TSA says they are doing what they are doing because of the current war on terror.

ffs, the war on terror is like the war on drugs, which is to say it has nothing to do with war, trivializes the actual horror that is actual war, and gives you no resolution or end--ever.

and a lot of people just eat it up.
11-19-2010 , 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
I have a fairly standard question that applies to government intervention like this. Other posters alluded to it yesterday but I would really like to see one of these knuckleheads like Pistone answer it. The question is what is the marginal benefit from doing this in quantitative terms? Put another way, the chances of flight being blown up are very low, how much will these measure decrease the frequency at which a plane is blown up? I'm guessing there's little benefit at the margin. If a question like this isn't considered then what is the basis for doing this? I'd like to know and I'm fairly certain the answer isn't all that comforting. I'm fairly certain that this is a "seat of the pants" type decision where some bureaucrat used their "logic" and came up with this idea and has no clue if there's any marginal benefit let alone quantify the benefit. Is there any chance that these changes in passenger screening increased the probability a plane could be blown up by someone?
The second question is too limited if what you want to do is answer the first. Clearly what is going on here is more than dropping the frequency of planes being blown up.

      
m