Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
What's the standard, here? 3 comments + 2 pundits = good enough?
Look forward to me criticizing you for what Olbermann, Maddow, and three morons on the internet said.
Well, I know that some of you guys are so self-absorbed that stuff like calling RP a racist is a slight against
you personally, but uhh, I never said anything about you or anyone in this thread, so this analogy fails.
So if you criticized me, personally, for what Olbermann, Maddow, and three morons on the internet said, I might object. If you said that Olbermann, Maddow and three morons on the internet said is emblematic of what the left in general thinks, then we'd have to investigate if those opinions we're wildly shared on the left.
Given that, do we actually have an alternative here? I mean when I listen to the right wing media, it's basically the Hannity/Malkin dichotomy; I see two camps: 1) I basically approve of all levels of degrading security measures (Hannity) or 2) I approve of all levels of degrading security measures, so long as only certain races or classes of people are subject to them, and the failure to only apply the draconian measures is a slight against the opposition party's political leaders (Malkin). Who sounds drastically different from that?