Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The TSA - Fondling your junk, for nothing: Epic Search Fail The TSA - Fondling your junk, for nothing: Epic Search Fail

05-29-2017 , 01:32 PM
Ohhh ya, Trump ****ed the US tourism industry bigly.
05-29-2017 , 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oroku$aki
Ohhh ya, Trump ****ed the US tourism industry bigly.
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
05-29-2017 , 02:21 PM
If I'm a major international organization looking for a place to hold a major conference, I can't imagine any destination in the US would be high on my list right now.
05-29-2017 , 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFS
I totally believe that they have real intelligence that terrorists have developed bombs that can be concealed in laptops. That doesn't surprise me at all. I'm confused why the bombs are so much more dangerous as carry-ons rather than checked baggage. Surely if they can make a laptop bomb they can detonate it remotely. Is it that the bombs are small, and thus must be detonated in a specific place like next to a window or something? I'm probably missing something obvious here.
Maybe there are additional security measures in place for checked bags? better screenings, bomb sniffing dogs?
05-29-2017 , 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
Maybe there are additional security measures in place for checked bags? better screenings, bomb sniffing dogs?
This is the only thing that would make sense. But if so, geez, I remember puffer machines I referred to as the Marilyn Monroe scanners that checked for bomb residue. Those things seemed much more likely to be effective than the nudie scanners.
06-03-2017 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
Maybe there are additional security measures in place for checked bags? better screenings, bomb sniffing dogs?
Possibly.

On the other hand, the fire danger from lithium batteries is much less in the cabin than in the cargo hold. The fires are noticed right away and can be extinguished. Putting all these lithium batteries in the cargo hold where a fire can go undetected for a while, and can be harder to extinguish, is certainly an extra risk.
06-03-2017 , 06:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFS
I totally believe that they have real intelligence that terrorists have developed bombs that can be concealed in laptops. That doesn't surprise me at all. I'm confused why the bombs are so much more dangerous as carry-ons rather than checked baggage. Surely if they can make a laptop bomb they can detonate it remotely. Is it that the bombs are small, and thus must be detonated in a specific place like next to a window or something? I'm probably missing something obvious here.
Well he said there's a box. Maybe it's bomb proof? Can you make a bomb proof box?
07-06-2017 , 03:22 PM
TSA fails to detect **** 94% of the time

https://thepointsguy.com/2017/07/tsa...etect-threats/
07-15-2017 , 11:13 PM
Does anyone with an IQ over 90 actually think the TSA does anything useful?
09-12-2017 , 01:38 PM
Welp, the TSA fails to find anything. Why? NOT FONDLING ENOUGH.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/hands-...rticle/2009631

Quote:
Well, since you asked, the agent runs his hand inside a passenger's waistband and also runs his hand up the back of each leg until he "meets resistance" and then does the same from the front of each leg. And then the TSA agent swipes the front of his hands 3 or 4 times right over the zipper area of one's Gap Outlet comfort-stretch khakis. That last part was the most unpleasant.

For what it's worth, this isn't the story of an agent who didn't know how to do a pat-down. The agent described exactly what he was going to do before he did it and seemed to be simply carrying out the government's policy.
09-14-2017 , 05:04 PM
09-15-2017 , 09:41 AM
LOL if some TSA goon wants to pat me down I'll starting moaning like Meg Ryan from the diner scene in "When Harry Met Sally".

      
m