Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
The easiest way to test my theory that Trump is susceptible to well reasoned arguments even if they go against his previously held beliefs (eg Obama moving him on Obamacare solutions) would be to have someone like Neil deGrasse Tyson explain the details of climate change to him.
"Trump doesn't understand climate change" is a hoax. He can listen, for example he listened to his campaign manager, he listened to Obama on healthcare, he listened to the prez of Mexico.
What they want is for USA to pay out billions via the UN where that money doesn't even go to help the environment. It's a scam. Under the agreement China gets to pollute at will until 2030 (at that time they can just say F U), while America has to pay out. What kind of ****ing deal is that?
They then promote these types of bs narratives in the media to guilt people into going along with the scam, while they laugh. Today, there are these garbage petitions done by the cdn govt like "sign if you agree that global warming is a real problem" but it's a straw man and what they want is tacit public approval so they can rope-a-dope you into agreeing to pay out foreign entities with your tax dollars.
Trump has been saying recently, I want crystal clean water, I want immaculately clean air, but **** the UN we ain't paying them ****, let's use the money to instead rebuild our environment and clean up our water at home. Good, the money benefits America like it should. **** the UN, how about let Flint MI have their water back finally.
Large entities are astroturfing media to shape public opinion constantly for their benefit. None of the biggest players give a **** about the environment, just like they don't care about racism or abortion or paying for violent rioters whatever. It's always seen as just, how can this be spun as an opportunity to profit?
Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
Last edited by Alex Wice; 11-12-2016 at 08:17 PM.