Law professor butthurt about liberals' Kavanaugh response questions "second-class intellect" of Sotomayor, deletes his Twitter

Chaser:

But yeah, sure, this is totally just a double standard liberals have. "Sotomayor has a lived insight into the ways that laws and public policy affect minorities in this country, and Kavanaugh has a lived insight into the great friendships you can make in elite carpool circles. IT'S THE SAME THING!"

Speaking of the "second-class intellect" of Sotomayor, here she is expressing in a pointed dissent the obviously dumb notion that executing people via drugs that inflict torturous pain is maybe not great (Tennessee did it anyway)

Bonus: Tennessee executed a guy who, under pending legislation, they might not be able to execute anymore due to his mental illness!

ikessssssssssssssssssssssssss

Like, I just want to marvel at this guy. She didn't ****ing accuse Till of rape, and Melkerson is personally not a big fan of no uppity colored boys, but he saw some dang race traitors talking about a ***** who be lying and saw a chance to plant a flag and forge common cause. ****ing hell.

Did you look hard enough to read the ****ing Wikipedia article on False Accusations of Rape?

Never ****ing forget, Melky, that you're you and that **** is forever! You don't ever get to talk back. For ****'s sake.

The carefully chosen initials on Nationally Social Democratic American Patriot is a nice touch.

The “future of the Democratic Party” is apparently “too scared” to debate a troll. Decides to chalk it up to Shapiro being sexist.

Ah yes breaking the long precedent of candidates for elected office debating random ****ing dudes is a death knell for AOC.

I mean, y'all really want to set that precedent? You vote for ****ing snake handlers and people who think they can see Russia from their house. If the standard becomes pundits get to demand opportunities to embarrass candidates with policy knowledge I got ten ****ing grand with Donald J Trump's name written on it.

I understand your sentiment, but your paraphrase is inaccurate. She said one of his top choices, which almost certainly indicates it wasn't his "top choice"

Lol. She had the option to say no. Or simply ignore him. She’s under no obligation to debate him. Her response however, was pathetic.

this has already been talked about, but it was an appropriate response, and if shapiro wants to pretend he's important he should run for office, or actually do anything of any importance what so ever rather than sit in a room and tell himself he's smart.

it was a totally fine response, although i wish she had been harsher.

Considering nothing Shapiro did was remotely sexist, no, it wasn’t an appropriate response. When in doubt, make it about gender...

I don't even know what this garbage is supposed to mean. I'd ask you to be clearer, but I'm not sure that's within your capabilities.

1. I don't even know what you think my position on the whole Till thing is. That dude was horribly wronged and the woman who accused him is a terrible human being.

2. If you want to go back and read it, the post I was responding to talked about an accusation of rape. That's what I responded to. I realize that there was no rape accusation in this particular case. I guess I should have corrected Trolly (and I almost did, but I glossed over it because I didn't have time to re-read the details of the case and make sure there wasn't a rape accusation in there somewhere that I missed). My bad. Or maybe you should have corrected him.

3. You should read your own wikipedia excerpt. I asked specifically for cases where the false accuser served time. In case decoding that is hard for you, I meant "spent time in prison". Then you refute that with a wikipedia paragraph that talks about prosecutions and says "The report did not indicate the verdicts following prosecution". Just go back and reread your own ****ing post.

If you want to dig up some examples of that, be my guest. I've already admitted, that I haven't looked. I guess I'm a ****ty person for that. Sorry.

Look fly, I don't know what the **** your problem is. I'm almost certain that our positions are identical with regard to Till. I realize that you're not that bright and you like to yell at people in your liberal Hannity style, but if you just took a breath and read things a little more carefully, it would be a massive improvement.

considering what he did has the practically the same elements of catcalling, yes it was an appropriate response. she likened it to being catcalled, and for someone as wannabe intellectual has ben shapiro he should understand that that use of language in her response isn't calling him sexist.

It's so incredible that these logic and reason debate team all stars are breaking down in tears at Ben getting called sexist because they literally do not understand how analogies work.

but...but... he's our hero... he uses alternative junk facts to slice through arguments and we don't look anything up, so we believe him all the time...

Ben Shapiro is such a master at debate he is a never trump conservative with 100% of his fans being trump supporters.

His *only* move is gish gallop. It's so boring. In the other thread someone brought up all the good criticisms lately of Peterson. That's because Peterson actually says stuff. Ben is just pedantic and boring. I dont know what shape your life is in if you waste time with either.

After 4 years of only posting in one thread about one topic, this is the thing that finally gets gs3737 to break containment and cape up.

Oh, sorry, sorry, you're right. He had to settle for U of Chicago! The horror!

You pretty clearly weren't aware of the facts of the case as you seemed to think she accused Till of rape. She did not.


No you should've just kept your ****ing mouth shut instead of chiming into with your MRA chain email bull****.

Not gonna do that for free, so let's bet. I'll lay you 2:1, my $200 to your $100, that I can find an example of someone who spent time in jail following a false rape claim.

You ran your ****ing mouth.

Yes? You literally invented, with no evidence, against intuition and common sense, an extraordinary claim that the feminazi justice system is protecting lying bitches.

It's an extraordinary harmful myth to spread and you still think it's true!

$200. Yours for the ****ing taking. You read those chain emails, boy, you had faith enough in them to run your mouth, now take my money.

Like I don't doubt you think Till was an injustice, but the difference is I see him as a victim of white supremacy while you see him as a victim of misandry. That's a distinction that can't just be papered over. **** off. But take my bet first.

she looks like someone you know who wouldn't give you the time of day, doesn't she

lol bingo

Please explain how what he did has the same elements as catcalling.

This I simply have to hear.

Like the man literally does not understand how analogies work and doesn't even seem to be slightly bothered by it? ****ing incredible. Her post was not difficult to understand or opaque in it's use of metaphor.

Uh, did you even read her tweet?

was the challenge warranted? -no, he's a nobody trying to ride her to some form of legitimacy

was the challenge requested? -no, to my knowledge AOC isn't out requesting challengers to be debated

was there an obvious subtext that he thought he deserved an answer or an acceptance? -clearly he's made that obvious from his statements since about her being scared.

is he reacting like an incel that got shot down by a woman? yes. as are you when your hero got called out.

catcalling-
is the comment warranted? no
was the comment requested? no
is there an obvious subtext that the caller deserves a response from the callee?- yes
is there a bad reaction from being shut down/ignored/corrected? yes.