What's an objective and fair news organization for you?

Oh this game. My favorite.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dont worry. You wont have to play long. Your ban is right around the corner.

.

Wikileaks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I, for one, am pretty OK with supporting and believing a news organization with an anti-neo-Nazi agenda.

Read it on a German site, just picked an English source to quote here.

Seems fair enough. So far no one's said that Wikileaks has fabricated anything

But wikileaks isnt a news organization.

uh, Jeff Bezos owns wapo.

They have 100% truthful track record. I don't think journalists know what the word "truth" means.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then Carlos owns the new York times. Point is, they are both fake news they use to push the agenda of the globalists that think they run the US.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who are these globalists?

True unfortunately Wikileaks only releases documents. If they have no documentation then they don't report on it which means their scope is rather limited. What's Wikileaks' analysis of healthcare? of the drop in artic ice? in the increase of measles outbreaks? They can't analyze it so they're pretty much useless outside of a small slice of reporting.

Soros, Cuban, bezos, Clintons, Branson, Slim. ANYONE you've seen that is vehemently speaking out against trump is scared he is going to ruin something for them. Whether it be their satanic child pedo ring ("pizza parties") or their ruthless biz practices that Amazon has.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What about me? I see who Trump has assigned in his cabinet and I don't see anything good from these guys and I am fairly sure they want to remove or make it more difficult for me and my friends to exercise our rights as Americans or when I look at all the conflicts of interest that's going on with Trump, or his infrastructure plan, or his tax plan and can only think it can only help those 'globalists' and other assorted elites out with their taxes and income?

This sounds terrible! All these powerful people are satanic pedophiles?! Where can I find out more information about this??

And what do I need to do for an invitation? I've been pretty vehemently anti-Trump, too!

Trump will not do anything to impede on our constitutional rights. And he will give the power back to the people and the states. I would not be so concerned. What's wrong with lower taxes? You want to pay more?

These globalists are already paying literally nothing in taxes. Trump isn't going to help them pay less. It's completely the opposite. He's going to make it fair. That's why every billionaire is furious with him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Google spirit cooking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They have a huge well known agenda led bias and the helicopter video that got them famous was so selectively edited it was essentially fabricated propaganda.

Know how we know you're white? lol

I think he was trying to hear the guy out. Not nitpick his points. Even though I was just calling for his ban, I kind of regret it now. I want to see how far Huehue could get with that line. Can he get him to see that Trump's presidency could harm some good people? It seems like dude was sincere, so maybe it's possible.

It's funny how the trump defender claims the "haters" abuse kids given trump was accused of child rape (the witness dropped her statements after hundreds of death threats), was friends with the billionaire child abuser, took flights with people who claim to have pimped children to rich clients, who has talked about having sex with minors when he sees them and who has said and done numerous inappropriate things with his daughter when she was underage.

Also he did commit at least one rape we know as a fact, but that was with his wife not a child.

Sent from my SM-T320 using Tapatalk

Given wikileaks acted as a state propaganda arm of Russia during this campaign, has numerous links to questionable regimes including Russia, has been proven to selectively leak material with a clear anti west and especially anti American agenda and their rapist leader openly admitted being against Hillary and for Trump we can't just casually skip by that they are an unbiased organisation.

Their bias definitely isn't a nitpick.

This is the problem with giving any ****ing ground. You can't legitimise such arguments by ignoring a point like that. Wikileaks is a terrible pick, they are barely better than RT or ****ebart as a choice he could have made and have biases a flaws at least as bad as CNN.