Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Tragic Death of Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman, Responsible Gun Owner The Tragic Death of Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman, Responsible Gun Owner

03-24-2012 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
picardfacepalm.jpg
you can do better than that
03-24-2012 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
ridiculous law and southern attitude that gave rise to it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine
03-24-2012 , 11:52 PM
Zimmerman strikes me more as the obsessive mall cop wannabe than a guy just out to hassle black people:

Quote:
The answer may lie in police records, which show that 50 suspicious-person reports were called in to police in the past year at Twin Lakes. There were eight burglaries, nine thefts and one other shooting in the year prior to Trayvon’s death.

In all, police had been called to the 260-unit complex 402 times from Jan. 1, 2011 to Feb. 26, 2012.

“He once caught a thief and an arrest was made,” said Cynthia Wibker, secretary of the homeowners association. “He helped solve a lot of crimes.”

Zimmerman told neighbors about stolen laptops and unsavory characters. Ibrahim Rashada, a 25-year-old African American who works at U.S. Airways, once spotted young men cutting through the woods entering the complex on foot, and later learned items were stolen those days.

“It’s a gated community, but you can walk in and steal whatever you want,” Rashada’s wife, Quianna, said.

They discussed the topic with Zimmerman when the watch captain knocked on their door late last year. Zimmerman seemed friendly, helpful, and a “pretty cool dude,” Ibrahim Rashada said.

“He came by here and talked about carrying guns and getting my wife more involved with guns,” he said. “He said I should have a weapon and that his wife took classes to learn how to use one.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/1...#storylink=cpy
03-24-2012 , 11:52 PM


Japan
Scotlande
Hungary
Ireland
Spain
Italy
Australia
Greece
New Zealand
Germany
Austria
Canada
France
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Switzerland
United States (up in the top right corner obv)
03-24-2012 , 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
you can do better than that
no sorry man, im all out for the night. As if you hadn't already exasperated me completely your anti-southern bigotry has pissed me off enough to not care anymore how muddled your logic is.
03-24-2012 , 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
sure but so would hundreds or thousands of innocent people, we are still talking about justice for all here right? Or are you willing to ride Martin's body like a sled down that slippery slope.
it's not a slippery slope argument, it's a floodgate. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people? Are you really under the impression that hundreds of thousands of innocent people are arrested and charged with murder solely because they were found to have failed to retreat? You should contact the innocence project they'd love to hear about this amazing revelation.
03-24-2012 , 11:53 PM
You could obviously make a different looking chart by including somalia etc. But I tried to choose countries that were semi-like the united states.
03-24-2012 , 11:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
My post had nothing to do with this
03-24-2012 , 11:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
Hundreds of thousands of innocent people?
hundreds OR thousands bro.... OR thousands.

I'm talking about the number of people that legitimately defend themselves that you would see twist in the wind.
03-24-2012 , 11:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
My post had nothing to do with this
there is a list of states and countries in there....
03-24-2012 , 11:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPVP
Here's a full link to the Justifiable Use of Force statutes in FL. They're littered with the reasonable person standard. I don't see why this case wouldn't be the same. I mean, what other standard would you be held to?



The police took him in for questioning and later released him. They told the local paper and news crews that the prosecutors told them (the police) they didn't have enough evidence to arrest for manslaughter. They've said Zimmerman was cooperative and that they knew how to get a hold of him. If they want to bring charges later they'll get a warrant and arrest him.
It seems to me that that this statute imports a new definitional standard for the reasonable person (i.e. that it's not not unreasonable to retaliate and that retreat is not the first option for the reasonable person).
03-25-2012 , 12:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
accountability for innocent bystanders etc is the same for a citizen defending themselves. Since we are talking about FLA here it is the even one of the primary rules of firearm safety that people are taught in the mandatory class to get a carry permit. This law doesn't change that responsibility. And his implication that if your not a cop your just going to fire blindly into crowd of people or something is laughable fear mongering.
lol, is this real life? You get mad at the guy for hyperbole and write the bolded? lololol

But I guess as long as private citizens have to take mandatory classes on firearm safety there's no chance anything could go wrong here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
LDO retreating is the best option. And any time you can escape a bad situation with no one harmed you have found to optimal solution. But that is not the point our illustrious chief is making here.
It's not? DO TELL!

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
He is implying that citizens will be popping caps in bums begging for change.
LOL NO

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
Stand your ground is not some sort of license to kill if you are "afraid" as this idiot implies. It means that in the presence of an ACTUAL THREAT you have the OPTION to retaliate.
In other words, you have a license to retaliate with deadly force if you fear for your life even if retreating is an option?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
For the record I have been hit up for change or been near people in alley thousands of times, I never shot anyone, I never even touched my gun.
This would be a fantastic, well-reasoned point if anyone was arguing that every single gun owner is incapable of harnessing the power they possess, but sadly nobody is

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
Without an actual rise in homicides all this tell us is that the law is doing what is supposed to do, protecting innocent people from wrongful prosecution.
Like George Zimmerman?

Like this guy that chased down someone that stole his car radio and stabbed him to death?

Like any of these cases?

LOL NEBLIS
03-25-2012 , 12:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Your Boss
This is on topic for the threads concept, but off topic for its current direction, but I have a question. I live in Central Florida so have been following this since basically the shooting. I have been on Martin's side of this since the word go. It all seems pretty cut and dry to me.

But at what point does this swing the other way?

How many offices have investigated this? Sanford police, a FL state task force, and the DOJ somehow, correct? How long will those investigations take? If it was pretty cut and dried as I (and most others itt) feel it is, why aren't the State or DOJ investigators pressing charges already? What is the probability that there is something not in the public arena yet that is giving them significant pause?
It's not very cut and dry. There's only one eye witness to the case, and that eye witness confirms part of the story that Zimmerman is telling. Here's a possible defense scenario:

Zimmerman was following Martin while on the phone with the police, Martin was on the phone with his gf. At some point Zimmerman say's "he's running". At the same time Martin is telling his gf he's going to just walk fast. The defense will claim that this increase in speed is what Zimmerman was referring to.

Then Zimmerman gets out of his car to question Martin. As he approaches Martin he says "what are you doing here?" while Martin says "why are you following me?". You need to realize, at this point, nobody has committed a crime, it's not illegal to approach and question somebody in your neighborhood. It's annoying, but it's not illegal.

This is the point where Martin's phone disconnected from his gf. Zimmerman will claim that Martin pushed him, and then took a swing at him. Then Zimmerman turned and ran from Martin around the back of the building. Martin pursued Zimmerman and tackled him from behind. Martin ended up on top of Zimmerman where he proceeded to throw punches while Zimmerman was effectively defenseless, all the while Zimmerman was screaming for help. This is the part where the eye witness confirms Zimmerman's story.

Finally, after a minute of so, Zimmerman managed to free his gun and fired a single shot into Martin, killing him.

Even in a duty to retreat state, if this is the story at trial and there isn't any physical evidence or eye witnesses to contradict it. Zimmerman walks.
03-25-2012 , 12:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
hundreds OR thousands bro.... OR thousands.

I'm talking about the number of people that legitimately defend themselves that you would see twist in the wind.
My mistake, the number is still laughable since the duty to retreat includes allowing for proportional measures if it's not reasonably safe to do so. I doubt you could find me one example of someone unreasonably prosecuted who legitimately might have tried to get away and then only killed the aggressor because it was impossible to do so. This law goes beyond way beyond that.
03-25-2012 , 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
there is a list of states and countries in there....
the majority being southern states...
03-25-2012 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
you misread my post i think. I'm not saying he shouldn't be charged or that he acted in any way that a reasonable person would. I'm saying that this situation has arisen because of the ridiculous law and southern attitude that gave rise to it.
and I'm saying he's a paranoid nut job who would do this in any state regardless of social attitudes and state law. Given that's he's acted like a paranoid nut job for years I think I'm standing on pretty firm ground, and speculating wildly to make this situation fit your worldview.
03-25-2012 , 12:14 AM
I really can't get over this. NeBlis, after first refusing to respond to the article because it's "hyperbolic bull****", claims the author is making these arguments:

Quote:
Originally Posted by What the article actually said
But I pointed out at the time that even a police officer is held to account for every single bullet he or she discharges, so why should a private citizen be given more rights when it came to using deadly physical force?
Quote:
Originally Posted by How NeBlis characterized what the article said
And his implication that if your not a cop your just going to fire blindly into crowd of people or something is laughable fear mongering.
Quote:
Originally Posted by What the article actually said
During one debate, one of the law’s proponents suggested that if a citizen felt threatened in a public space, he should not have to retreat and should be able to meet force with force. I pointed out that citizens feel threatened all the time, whether it’s from the approach of an aggressive panhandler or squeegee pest or even just walking down a poorly lighted street at night. In tightly congested urban areas, public encounters can be threatening; a look, a physical bump, a leer, someone you think may be following you. This is part of urban life. You learn to navigate threatening settings without resorting to force. Retreating is always the best option.
Quote:
Originally Posted by How NeBlis characterized what the article said
He is implying that citizens will be popping caps in bums begging for change.
Why should anybody take you seriously?
03-25-2012 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by will1530
and I'm saying he's a paranoid nut job who would do this in any state regardless of social attitudes and state law. Given that's he's acted like a paranoid nut job for years I think I'm standing on pretty firm ground, and speculating wildly to make this situation fit your worldview.
You're trying to mentally diagnose him to fit your worldview apparently. There is no way a do gooder, wanna be cop neighborhood watch type would do this in Massachusetts or New York imo you can call that "wild speculation" but I don't think it fits that states where carrying guns is unheard of would have neihborhood watch captains who think they're upstanding citizens carrying illegally. I'm not a provincial snob, there's plenty of problems here too, but the tough guy vigilante justice make my day crap is a southern mentality.
03-25-2012 , 12:17 AM
As long as I'm gif bombing ITT, the one that applies now is:

03-25-2012 , 12:19 AM
Quote:
The contortions and gymnastics you are going through
You are correct. I have seen someone killed at the hands of special forces exactly zero times with my own eyes.

However, I am hardly going through contortions or gymnastics. Just out of curiosity, I looked up bare handed killing techniques on the internet just to see what was out there about it. Something that immediately popped up was about Nancy Wake. Nancy was a special forces operative for the SOE in WWII.

Quote:
From April 1944 to the liberation of France, her 7,000 maquisards fought 22,000 SS soldiers, causing 1,400 casualties, while taking only 100 themselves. Her French companions, especially Henri Tardivat, praised her fighting spirit, amply demonstrated when she killed an SS sentry with her bare hands to prevent him from raising the alarm during a raid.
(emphasis added)
During a 1990s television interview, when asked what had happened to the sentry who spotted her, Wake simply drew her finger across her throat. "They'd taught this judo-chop stuff with the flat of the hand at SOE, and I practised away at it. But this was the only time I used it -- whack -- and it killed him all right. I was really surprised."
That's from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Wake

Here's another article about her. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/ar...otte-Gray.html



That's a picture of her in her 90's standing next to Cate Blanchett. If you notice, she's not that big. She was probably a little taller in her prime. In internet world, it must seem like an impossibility that this delicate little lady could kill a Nazi in one blow. In reality, it's different.

Contortions? Gymnastics? Hardly.
03-25-2012 , 12:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
You're trying to mentally diagnose him to fit your worldview apparently. There is no way a do gooder, wanna be cop neighborhood watch type would do this in Massachusetts or New York imo you can call that "wild speculation" but I don't think it fits that states where carrying guns is unheard of would have neihborhood watch captains who think they're upstanding citizens carrying illegally. I'm not a provincial snob, there's plenty of problems here too, but the tough guy vigilante justice make my day crap is a southern mentality.
There isn't a single state in the nation where carrying guns is unheard of to my knowledge. There's a couple ridiculous cities, but those will be going away soon. Lol at comparing this guy to your average neighborhood watch do gooder. It's quite plain from the 911 recording we all heard, the dozens and dozens of 911 calls over the years, and his various interactions with his neighbors, that this guy is a nut. If you honestly think this guy is an average joe who got carried away, then we're way too far apart in our perspective to have an intelligent conversation.
03-25-2012 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by will1530
There isn't a single state in the nation where carrying guns is unheard of to my knowledge. There's a couple ridiculous cities, but those will be going away soon. Lol at calling comparing this guy to your average neighborhood watch do gooder. It's quite plain from the 911 recording we all heard, the dozens and dozens of 911 calls over the years, and his various interactions with his neighbors, that this guy is a nut. If you honestly think this guy is an average joe who got carried away, then we're way too far apart in our perspective to have an intelligent conversation.
I didn't say the word "average" lol@ trying to work that word into my argument.

This guy was so ostracized that after his dozens and dozens of phone calls, his overtly racist attitude and his various interactions with neighbors that he was still the neighborhood watch captain. you are trying to argue against a straw man that has me saying this is normal behavior in the South, I have never said that. All i have said is that this is a clear side effect of a tough guy mentality leading to terrible laws based on fear that have bad real world consequences.

Crime is at it's lowest rate ever and all you hear amongst right wing politicians, especially in the south, is tough on crime rhetoric. Right wing media is littered with disproportionately covered stories about individual crimes and neighborhoods under attack and good god-fearing white folk getting raped and robbed.

It's blatantly obvious that this atmosphere is responsible for many terrible aspects of the southern justice system, including why this clown hasn't been charged, because even though he admittedly followed and confronted the guy with a gun, in Florida that doesn't mean he did anything wrong. When you legislate based on irrational fear, you get irrational consequences.
03-25-2012 , 12:38 AM


2, 1.
03-25-2012 , 12:44 AM
OMG expert play troll.
03-25-2012 , 12:46 AM
ITT NeBlis remembers that goofballer is not worth even trying to talk to. I knew better from the start. The rest of you I will get back to later. I need to get some sleep, I have to go shoot guns all day tomorrow.

      
m