Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Tragic Death of Mike Brown: No Indictment, No Peace The Tragic Death of Mike Brown: No Indictment, No Peace

09-19-2014 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
You can tell the people bashing King haven't bothered to read anything. Yeah, he's just a guy posting links to stuff on twitter, but if you, you know, READ what he's posted it's all supported and paints a pretty gross picture.
Ummmm we just went over him failing using his posts, and ffs fly said he did a **** job
09-19-2014 , 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Yes, they should seek peaceful redress at the ballot box where you can work to deny their rights through the Voter ID laws you advocate.

Also so weird that we can predict which "side" you'll blame for any violence that occurs.

Lol TwoMoos as usual.
Do you think they should wait for the ballot box? With 50 out of 53 policemen being white, it's pretty obvious the community lacks good leadership. Thus, if there is no indictment, trouble is likely.

How do you define the "sides"? There is a "side" that believes unarmed men shouldn't be shot to death in broad daylight. There is a "side" that believes random rioting and looting is bad for the neighborhood. Maybe you can define a "side" that you prefer.
09-20-2014 , 08:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoMoos
Do you think they should wait for the ballot box? With 50 out of 53 policemen being white, it's pretty obvious the community lacks good leadership. Thus, if there is no indictment, trouble is likely.

How do you define the "sides"? There is a "side" that believes unarmed men shouldn't be shot to death in broad daylight. There is a "side" that believes random rioting and looting is bad for the neighborhood. Maybe you can define a "side" that you prefer.
I'm on the side against murder. You seem to be on the side against property damage. That's pretty weird to me.
09-20-2014 , 01:02 PM
If you're against murder, do you have to be for property damage?
09-20-2014 , 01:04 PM
Not always.
09-20-2014 , 01:11 PM
In this context, probably
09-20-2014 , 01:20 PM
As someone on team #assemble-and-speak, it sure would be better if the cops actually made any effort (even the slightest little effort) to prevent vandalism -vs- spending all of their effort into violently suppressing assembly and speech.
09-21-2014 , 06:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
...Let the GJ do their job...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Who is attempting to stop the GJ from doing their job? How could people speculating on a random interwebs forum possibly stop the GJ from doing it's job? WTF is this even supposed to mean ??
You obviously didn't read my post. I was responding to a post lauding the effort of one Shaun King in bringing forth the 'gross picture' that is the investigation into the death of Mike Brown. Mr. King is not one of the nitwits who randomly posts on 2+2. He is a journalist that has 73K twitter followers. He tosses around words like 'murder' and 'executed' when talking about the death of Mike Brown. Based on my reading of his theory, Mr. King has a rather tenuous understanding of what few facts are known in this case. IMHO, King should shut the **** up and let the GJ do it's job. Still confused? Oops, evidently you still are because:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
I read it and it's a load of crap. King claims... executed face to face. But then King quotes... Wilson 10 to 15 feet behind. About 90 feet... 2 completely different stories... FFS get your story straight... The Conservative Treehouse. Interestingly King didn't... They were about 200' from the final resting place...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
If your point is that nobody should speculate on an interwebs forum (for no apparent reason)... why the flip are you speculating on an interwebs forum? Please, Mojo56, can't you just let the GJ do their job ??
Again, did you even read my post? That is not me speculating, that is King speculating. I am reciting his theory where he contradicts himself with his own evidence. Your entire post is an epic bucket of fail. Still confused?

09-21-2014 , 06:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
That map doesn't appear to have the construction workers in the right spot?

If they're in that lot they should be a bit further south, or more to the east if the location of the times video is where this is from. given how the video of them is taken, no?

I think the location is pretty accurate. It is based on a compilation of videos and pictures that were taken just after the shooting. I think the still you posted is from the same building as the Times video but from the ground floor.
09-21-2014 , 06:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chips Ahoy
Maybe it's just me, but with all the conflicting versions -- he's shooting at him while he's running away, he's shooting at him while he's stopped, he's shooting at him while he's running towards the cop -- they all sound like murder to me. The grand jury result will tell me something about the prosecutor, not about the murder.
+1. Not because I agree with you, (I don't), but because at least you have the balls to admit that you don't give a rat's ass what the evidence says. That is true commitment to the cause and for that you are applauded. You are hereby appointed captain of Team Brown. Wear the 'C' proudly my friend.
09-21-2014 , 06:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Conservative Treehouse is a tremendous site lol, in their straight writing they call him Big Mike Brown and make a LOT of knowing comments about how Ben Crump set the Narrative and Agenda, and the comments are, well, what you would think.
That site was the origin of the "Trayvon Martin was on lean because Skittles" theory that took white America by storm.
09-21-2014 , 06:21 AM
How many facts of the case do you need to know before you can use words like murder? Is witness testimony and the autopsy not enough?
09-21-2014 , 06:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 13ball
That site was the origin of the "Trayvon Martin was on lean because Skittles" theory that took white America by storm.
A despicable site indeed. But evidently not despicable enough for provocateur Shaun King to lift a map from there to use for his own misguided theory. Didn't even give them a shout out. Typical leftist, stealing other peoples property.
09-21-2014 , 06:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
How many facts of the case do you need to know before you can use words like murder? Is witness testimony and the autopsy not enough?
Generally I prefer more facts over less facts and sworn witness testimony over newspaper gossip. But that's just me.

BTW, you can be Assistant Captain. You get to wear the 'A'.
09-21-2014 , 06:36 AM
Just to be clear, the reporter guy isnt able to convict someone of murder. Even if, like in this case, it is very obviously murder.
09-21-2014 , 08:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
...IMHO, King should shut the **** up and let the GJ do it's job. Still confused?...
Once again, how is King speculating in any way stopping the GJ from doing it's job. Dude, that doesn't even make any sense. Nobody, is saying anything about disbanding or disrupting the GJ. Can you even finish this sentence: "Interwebs speculation disbands or disrupts Grand Juries by means of ______". WTF are you even squawking about ??

Quote:
... That is not me speculating, that is King speculating...
Dude, you weren't there. All you have to judge King's speculations against are your own speculations. You are in fact speculating that your speculations are better than King's speculations.

You're entire series of posts are an epic bucket of fail. Still confused? Why don't you stop trying to disband or disrupt the GJ from doing it's job by this mysterious and unexplained magical power of interwebs speculation ??
09-21-2014 , 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
Generally I prefer more facts over less facts and sworn witness testimony over newspaper gossip. But that's just me.

BTW, you can be Assistant Captain. You get to wear the 'A'.
You must be outraged by all the speculation that Brown went for his gun, while on drugs, before he charged him...
09-21-2014 , 10:49 AM
The right is more aggravated about speculation involving white folk
09-21-2014 , 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
I think the location is pretty accurate. It is based on a compilation of videos and pictures that were taken just after the shooting. I think the still you posted is from the same building as the Times video but from the ground floor.
Which would put the location closer to that building and not the dot on the map.
09-21-2014 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
I speculate the location is pretty accurate. It is based on a compilation of videos and pictures that were taken just after the shooting. I speculate the still you posted is from the same building as the Times video but from the ground floor.
FYP. When-oh-when will Mojo56 stop attempting to disband or disrupt the GJ by magical and unexplained power of speculating over the interwebs... why won't he let the GJ do it's job ??
09-21-2014 , 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo56
Generally I prefer more facts over less facts and sworn witness testimony over newspaper gossip. But that's just me.

BTW, you can be Assistant Captain. You get to wear the 'A'.
So I assume you're rooting for a murder indictment so we can get this all hashed out in open court, right?
09-22-2014 , 02:50 PM
Apparently the DOJ banned reporters and non-residents from the upcoming Ferguson town meetings. This is against the MO sunshine law 610.010.4(c) "presumption of openness." Go ahead and read about it if you can here: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/g...4b97be012.html
09-22-2014 , 03:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by longmissedblind
Apparently the DOJ banned reporters and non-residents from the upcoming Ferguson town meetings. This is against the MO sunshine law 610.010.4(c) "presumption of openness." Go ahead and read about it if you can here: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/g...4b97be012.html
Your article indicates it doesn’t violate Missouri’s Sunshine Law because only two council members would be present.
09-22-2014 , 04:51 PM
The section cited in my quote is "Subunit of public body" which 2 members could be argued to be, not presumption of openness which is 610.011.1. Obv my position here doesn't agree with the article.
09-23-2014 , 12:50 PM
Danielle Watts gets her own containment thread for that nonsense.

      
m