The Tragic Death of the Democratic Party
02-09-2017
, 11:53 AM
02-09-2017
, 05:34 PM
02-09-2017
, 09:50 PM
02-09-2017
, 10:48 PM
02-10-2017
, 12:16 AM
02-10-2017
, 12:41 AM
Quote:
Quote:
It was you who referred to the civil rights movement as SJW, I was mocking you. You specifically said 'they are hurting their own cause', apparently blissfully unaware that you are taking up the mantle of ~William F Buckley "why don't they put me in charge." Well, golly, Phone Booth I truly wonder why. I daresay 5five is reading you carefully.
Quote:
They already have. That's what I said earlier, to Phone Booth. The Democrats are not who you think they are; they are those people and many more. Yes, even white ones, even Evangelicals. But those Evangelicals are rare for a reason. Most of the sincere conservative Evangelicals have, let's be nice, theological issues concerning core Democratic principles.
Quote:
I will concede, and have, in fact, conceded in other threads that religion must be taken seriously. Just not unserious religions. Within every major faith that I'm aware of, there exist serious persons, and I don't mean those serious persons (not usually). An awful lot of people are straight up lying about their deeply held faith. I don't mean casual hypocrisy. And I don't think conservatives are incapable of serious adherence, either.
Within these traditions is often where 'radical' moral progress is made. But, it's pretty far from their exclusive domain. What the **** is the Sermon on the Mount if not taking a rhetorical position that is maximally upsetting to others? Like, I'm legitimately questioning, in a non-rhetorical way, your reading comprehension abilities if you're saying what you seem to be saying.
"Well, you see, when I said this my definition was blah blah."
Just publish the goddamn Tractatus already.
All at once.
Submit reply.
Within these traditions is often where 'radical' moral progress is made. But, it's pretty far from their exclusive domain. What the **** is the Sermon on the Mount if not taking a rhetorical position that is maximally upsetting to others? Like, I'm legitimately questioning, in a non-rhetorical way, your reading comprehension abilities if you're saying what you seem to be saying.
"Well, you see, when I said this my definition was blah blah."
Just publish the goddamn Tractatus already.
All at once.
Submit reply.
Quote:
The Bill of Rights, and further civil rights work isn't SJW nonsense, Phone Booth. Stop meditating on the mountain. Go find where I'm talking about how we need to invent the best words to describe intersectional feminist conflict theory, you know, for progress. Like, shrug, I don't know, enforcement of the equal protection clause? Let's do that. If I attended some hippie commune and discussed the need to transcend our bodies, become nature, and so on, I must've forgotten.
The Democratic Party is not an instrument of the people of which you speak. That you believe otherwise, well, you tell us. They throw fits on twitter and mostly live in actual dorm rooms. Writing policy they ain't. But, their existence it would appear to frighten your delicate sensibilities, and mistake some for others. You've been had. Torch your library. There I go again, that rhetorical twist, funneling deplorables to the polling stations. I must contain myself. Find my mountain. Please signal signal forgive signal me.
The Democratic Party is not an instrument of the people of which you speak. That you believe otherwise, well, you tell us. They throw fits on twitter and mostly live in actual dorm rooms. Writing policy they ain't. But, their existence it would appear to frighten your delicate sensibilities, and mistake some for others. You've been had. Torch your library. There I go again, that rhetorical twist, funneling deplorables to the polling stations. I must contain myself. Find my mountain. Please signal signal forgive signal me.
Quote:
Phone Booth said the problem with SJW's is they ain't radical enough, AND they would be foolish not to cooperate with selling out some civil rights issues for power. In different posts. I'm not entirely sure how to merge these concepts. With regards to "depress black turnout" he believes no such thing would take place. I asked him.
It's almost like you have to study POLITICS to understand POLITICS. Incredible, who knew?
02-10-2017
, 12:49 AM
02-10-2017
, 08:27 PM
02-11-2017
, 03:40 PM
02-11-2017
, 04:15 PM
02-11-2017
, 04:20 PM
02-11-2017
, 04:41 PM
02-11-2017
, 07:37 PM
02-11-2017
, 07:59 PM
02-11-2017
, 09:37 PM