Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

07-12-2018 , 06:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Can someone cliff to a Brit who doesn't know these players, wtf this event is?
Dirty Pete bro ya herd?
07-12-2018 , 06:08 PM
So the world really will end not with a bang but a whimper?
07-12-2018 , 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Can someone cliff to a Brit who doesn't know these players, wtf this event is?
Peter Strzok is an fbi agent that worked on muellers special counsel regarding russians interference into the 2016 election and trumps campaigns involvement.

Peter privately texted that he doesn't think Trump is fit to be president and sucks. You know, like most of the free world.

Republicans think him not liking Trump should invalidate the entire investigation. Despite their own investigation concluding he never acted with bias in the investigation.
07-12-2018 , 06:10 PM
One of the FBI love birds. Treason, necking, and heavy petting on the clock no less.
07-12-2018 , 06:11 PM
If we let this hearing get to the point where everyone wants and it's just a free-for-all brawl with no restrictions on using anything in the room as a weapon, and it's just Strzok vs the Repub members, how long do you have it lasting?

Oh yes, Ted Lieu now.
07-12-2018 , 06:11 PM
A fbi agent texted his side piece some things that hurt republican’s fee fees. Now a clownshow is ensuing in which they aggressively compete to generate soundbites and propaganda to erode the american public’s confidence in the FBI, and indirectly through that, the Mueller investigation, so when the **** inevitably hits the fan and the evidence is out in the open, donald trump merely has to tweet WITCH HUNT!!! And it will all be forgotten in a week.
07-12-2018 , 06:12 PM
That sounds like it could be the end of the investigation and full steam ahead for the Trump Reich.
07-12-2018 , 06:26 PM
Oh my god, epic rant from Raskin here in his allotted time
07-12-2018 , 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirOsis
Oh my god, epic rant from Raskin here in his allotted time
What are you guys watching? Link? One I was using ended.
07-12-2018 , 06:36 PM
I'm watching on CNN but I think this works:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOAS...ature=youtu.be
07-12-2018 , 06:40 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...e_iOSApp_Other

Trumps meltdown at NATO summit


The first indication that things were not going to plan on the final day of Nato’s summit came from a group of Romanian journalists. They had left the main newsroom to observe a meeting between Donald Trump and the Romanian president, Klaus Iohannis.

They returned to report that the meeting had been scrapped. Further reports began to spread around the newsroom. An earlier meeting between Trump and the leader of Azerbaijan had also been cancelled. So too had one planned with the leader of Ukraine. And Georgia.

Something was up. And that something was Trump, who, ever unpredictable, had gone on a diplomatic rampage, throwing long-prepared Nato plans into chaos.


On Wednesday night Nato leaders had begun to hope the worst was behind them. Trump had hours earlier delivered a rant against Germany, accusing it of failing to pay enough on defence and becoming a “captive” of Russia by allowing itself to become too dependent on Russian energy supplies.

Later the same day he had sounded calmer and more emollient during a series of private meetings, particularly over dinner with the other leaders. “I have to tell you that the atmosphere last night at dinner was very open, was very constructive and it was positive,” the president of Croatia, Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović, told reporters on Thursday morning.

The agenda for Thursday seemed, on the surface, to offer little reason for further confrontation with Trump: a routine discussion of moves by Georgia and Ukraine to join Nato and of Nato involvement in Afghanistan.

It began on time, at 8.45am. Theresa May, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron and other leaders were there. But Trump was missing.
Seldom keen on such detailed discussions, the US president turned up late and came with a different agenda.

Ignoring the discussion about Georgia and Afghanistan, Trump charged forward, saying his predecessors in the White House had pushed for an increase by Europeans on defence spending and he was not going to put up with it. Dispensing with the usual diplomatic niceties, he pointed at Merkel, whom he dislikes on a personal level as well as over their policy differences, and said: “You, Angela.”

The most stunning comment came from a source reported by Reuters: “He said they must raise spending by January 2019 or the United States would go it alone.”

This was greeted with shocked silence. It had seemed unthinkable: a US president threatening to pull out of a military alliance that the US has regarded as a cornerstone of its military strategy for 69 years.

No one appears to be disputing the words. What is being disputed is the interpretation. Reuters reported Trump as having threatened to quit Nato but then rescinded this. Macron insisted this had not been Trump’s meaning.

But just as alarming was the apparent ultimatum. European leaders who have so far failed to reach Nato’s 2% defence spending target are talking about achieving this years from now, not by January.

Responding to the rising sense of panic in the room, the Nato secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, called an emergency meeting. The leaders of Afghanistan and Georgia were asked to leave as they were not Nato members. The US president’s demand for further discussion of spending took precedence over Ukrainian and Georgian accession to Nato and the Afghanistan government’s fight with the Taliban.

The meeting then broke up, without Stoltenberg or any of the other European leaders offering a single concession.

A series of press conferences with European leaders had been scheduled but were cancelled as the leaders quickly headed straight for the airport. Downing Street insisted May had never intended to hold a press conference, even though one with her was being trailed on Nato’s internal television network, complete with location and time, and some journalists had headed over to the briefing room.

Trump was not scheduled to hold one but did. The crisis meeting on spending knocked his schedule back by at least half an hour. The press conference added another 35 minutes.

At the press conference, he hailed the summit as a success, praised Nato, insisted his relationship with other Nato leaders was good and – though other European leaders later disputed this – that they had agreed to significant increases in spending.

Trump, soon after leaving Brussels, tweeted a short video of the highlights of the Nato summit, which suggested a parallel universe in which the meeting had been a total success: flags, motor cavalcades, greeting Stoltenberg, sitting in amiable discussion with other leaders and standing together for the group picture, and a final wave at the press conference.

There were no rants about defence spending. In short, it had been a triumph. Attached to the video, he wrote: “Thank you @Nato2018!”
07-12-2018 , 06:43 PM
So whats the deal with Bruce Ohr giving the FBI documents from the dossier after steele was terminated as a reliable source? Is that a big deal?

Last edited by StimAbuser; 07-12-2018 at 07:02 PM.
07-12-2018 , 06:54 PM
This gosa**** from Arizona needs an “off” button
07-12-2018 , 06:55 PM
Serious question. Is Mr Gohmert ******ed?
07-12-2018 , 06:55 PM
Not a single thing in that Guardian article is remotely surprising.
07-12-2018 , 06:58 PM
Euros,

Decrease your military spending.
07-12-2018 , 07:00 PM
I have to give this guy a lot of credit. This is the best congressional performance I can remember. He's destroying these clowns.
07-12-2018 , 07:01 PM
So dirty Pete is like Stan Beeman?
07-12-2018 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
I have to give this guy a lot of credit. This is the best congressional performance I can remember. He's destroying these clowns.
Suzzler,

How do the Chief's fans see it?
07-12-2018 , 07:05 PM
micro,

loooooooooollllllllll

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...316192&page=12
07-12-2018 , 07:07 PM
The trumpers on the forum I visit think Bruce Ohr funneling Steele dossier documents to the FBI after Steele was terminated as a reliable source is going to bring the investigation down.
07-12-2018 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dth123451
A few posts in someone gets to the heart of GOP politics

Quote:
Do the Dems have any White people in this hearing?
07-12-2018 , 07:13 PM
Lol what’s with this stupid line of questioning where they are trying to paint the FBI as a bunch of democrats.

It’s clearly, historically, obviously and demonstrably untrue.
07-12-2018 , 07:16 PM
A few posts later there's more

Quote:
(((Democrats))) lecturing and trying to take the high road, looking down their crooked noses
Parenthesis mine
07-12-2018 , 07:18 PM
These things are all relative I guess. I often get called a Communist by a far right winger I'm unfortunate enough to work with, outside of work. Relative to the modern Repub party the FBI probably are liberals.

      
m