Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sarah Palin, BruceZ, and Mean People on the Internet Sarah Palin, BruceZ, and Mean People on the Internet

07-11-2017 , 11:52 PM
No, my epeen is biggest.
07-11-2017 , 11:53 PM
this thread has everything
07-11-2017 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5ive
this thread has everything
Even defenders of racists!
07-11-2017 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
i'm not offended

clovis is such a typical republican, he thinks power and money are the end game in life

i'm living my life exactly the way i want to, so yea
And, like the other occasion, it's not necessarily you I'm thinking about.

If I say to you "rep_lol, I can't take your opinion seriously because you're a worthless poor person"....

It's hard to express how elitist and condescending that is to every single poor person. It makes no difference whether you specifically are poor or not or whether you specifically are offended.

And the same goes for power and education. If I insult you by saying your educational attainment wasn't high enough, how is that not an insult to every other poster in this thread who has that same or lower level of educational attainment?

It's just so elitist.

But, whatever, Clovis, you don't owe me an apology, or really rep_lol. I just think it's something to think about. Be a dick to the people you want to be a dick to, but don't include some whole other group of people in on it.
07-11-2017 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
You do know that is an incredibly sexist phrase, right?
so you're not willing to wager on anything then, just to be clear?
07-11-2017 , 11:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
Even defenders of racists!
You want no part of this.





Actually scratch that, I wasted all my power pills with that nonsense earlier.
07-11-2017 , 11:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
And, like the other occasion, it's not necessarily you I'm thinking about.

If I say to you "rep_lol, I can't take your opinion seriously because you're a worthless poor person"....

It's hard to express how elitist and condescending that is to every single poor person. It makes no difference whether you specifically are poor or not or whether you specifically are offended.

And the same goes for power and education. If I insult you by saying your educational attainment wasn't high enough, how is that not an insult to every other poster in this thread who has that same or less level of educational attainment?

It's just so elitist.

But, whatever, Clovis, you don't owe me an apology, or really rep_lol. I just think it's something to think about. Be a dick to the people you want to be a dick to, but don't include some whole other group of people in on it.
I agree it was insulting to more than rep, the intended target. I was having fun mocking rep and didn't think of the larger context of the insult. I didn't mean it that way but can see how it would be read as thus. My apology was not to you, and certainly not rep, but to the people it mocked.
07-11-2017 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
so you're not willing to wager on anything then, just to be clear?
I'm willing to wager that phrase you love so much is sexist.
07-12-2017 , 12:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I'm willing to wager that phrase you love so much is sexist.
let me know when you're able to put all your money and higher education to use and hammer out some terms on a wager relating to my character, or anything else really...you know, since you made an offhand remark about how much you'd like to
07-12-2017 , 12:05 AM
in b4 "herp derp lets bet on whether or not calling somebody a pussy is sexist!" derppppppppp

you're so concerned with truth and objectivity itt and pointing out everybody's imaginary transgressions, ought to be super easy to pin me down right?
07-12-2017 , 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
let me know when you're able to put all your money and higher education to use and hammer out some terms on a wager relating to my character/behavior/actions, or anything else really...you know, since you made an offhand remark about how much you'd like to
As soon as you or anyone explains how such a bet could be adjudicated I will happily bet $500.

How would we track every post all of you make on the internet over the next year or their veracity?
07-12-2017 , 12:06 AM
idk, pay attention? do a search every couple weeks?

this welfare queen thinks he's just gonna collect a whopping $500 without working for it, lol

careful tho big spender, wouldn't wanna dent that bank account. sure you dont wanna put more on it?
07-12-2017 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
in b4 "herp derp lets bet on whether or not calling somebody a pussy is sexist!" derppppppppp

you're so concerned with truth and objectivity itt and pointing out everybody's imaginary transgressions, ought to be super easy to pin me down right?
Are you allowed to say "in b4" after the post you are predicting? Doesn't that break the space time continuum or something?
07-12-2017 , 12:09 AM
you're scared
07-12-2017 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
you're scared
Got me. Petrified.
07-12-2017 , 12:11 AM
ok lmk when your balls drop and you want to put some money behind those empty words
07-12-2017 , 12:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
ok lmk when your balls drop and you want to put some money behind those empty words
Can you arrange my Scott Pruitt bet too? I'll cut you in.
07-12-2017 , 12:19 AM
i dont know or care wtf youre talking about right now

if you really wanted to wager on whether or not i'd knowingly trot out some bull**** lie about something political within x amount of time and then, when called on it, say "oh well so what it's nbd, the target of my lie deserves the scorn", you could do that! easily! but you wont, because you're completely full of **** and you know that's not my M.O.- you just running your mouth like a pussy

i'll give you even money, put $1k on it. wug bro?
07-12-2017 , 12:23 AM
Perhaps you don't understand what adjudicate means?

Lol you edited your post to add your favourite sexist phrase again.
07-12-2017 , 12:25 AM
I'm bored now. Just going to block you. I've had my fun. You and fly don't exist on the forum now.
07-12-2017 , 12:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
5ive,

I swear I posted this already, but....

I was just skimming what happened after the flare up and it may well have been someone else focusing on the particular word.
Ok, it was totally my bad that I made two big assumptions, making asses out of you and me and everybody else.

I didn't spell out from the jump that IMO the insult of, to quote myself from earlier, "saying the person is of such sufficiently low character that they would brutalize their own people in order to kowtow and curry favor with their authoritarian overlords," is way more of an extreme charge than any gobbledygook racist epithets. I assumed this angle was obvious but Yuv et al said I was, "only saying kapo is..." And I'm like, there's no "only" here, that's the big deal thing.

Like, "A kapo by any other name would still smell as foul."

I've lost track of the number of times I've referred to wil with his fascist bootlicking as, "vying for Honorary Aryan status," and rightfully nobody interprets that as slanderous against Japanese or Korean people. And yes, it's a barb specifically related to him being Korean.

The other assumption is that I thought Yuv for the most part agreed but wanted to make Fly wriggle on the hook. I wasn't trolling when I said I suspected Yuv might be trolling.

But if people want to decree "kapo" has N-word status, that's fine. When in Rome.
07-12-2017 , 12:28 AM
do you really not see how it would "adjudicate" itself if i backed down from a lie and changed my story to say "oh well who cares, the scorn is deserved regardless" ?

i thought you were educated and stuff bro

but yea go ahead and cop out like a scrub, nobody expected you to go through with it anyway. chez will still be your friend.
07-12-2017 , 12:29 AM
This entire thread is broken. Mods, make it stop.
07-12-2017 , 12:29 AM
If you want to bet, just agree on an arbitrator.
07-12-2017 , 12:30 AM
TTHRIC

      
m