Specifically, the house and senate of the great commonwealth of Virginia. Were it not for the governor's veto, impressionable young 17-18 year-olds might be safe from the nightmare-inducing terror of Pulitzer-Prize winning literature.

This State Wants a Trigger Warning for Toni Morrison

Lol, that's hilarious! Glad I finally convinced you guys. Was it the Obama thing?

Do you post while on speed?

Damn SJW liberals and their trigger warnings!!!

http://www.nsta.org/about/pressroom....681&print=true

Excuse me, but Yr. Trolly does not need performance-enhancing drugs to maintain this high-octane level of quality posting, tyvm.

I am a big fan of the absurd but I really don't think a few posts on a forum qualifies.

I only ocassionally get into my stride and have to assume people are joking about drugs being required.

But you could step up your blabber and teeth grinding game.

I do love watching Parliament.

Can someone count what percentage of folds post are just "lol OBAMA said this platitude I win"

Last night I learned that if universities don't act as leftist institutions then David Duke will have to be at commencement.

That example has a snopes page.

Not to spoil the surprise but having a snopes page isn't a good sign it is an example you want to use

http://www.snopes.com/emory-students-trump-graffiti/

Foldn in the thread protecting free speech by suggesting you just shut the **** up and write a letter gtfo silly lefties this ain't a safe space where dissenting opinion is restricted.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Damn lefties are allowed to talk about that crazy science mumbo jumbo all they want and we can't even disparage brown people anymore. When are middle age white guys gonna catch a break?

Nonsense! PC liberal culture run amok on campus is absolutely the equivalent existential crisis facing our nation today as 400 years of pervasive systemic racism. The left has their stupid things, the right has their stupid things. Totally equal and opposite. I said good day sir!

You have it backwards. It's the protesters who are often trying to shout over, interrupt and drown out speech. That's unreasonable. If the speaker welcomes it and there is a dialogue, that's great. If it's just chanting to prevent the speaker being heard, not so much.

I watched the latest protest on Clinton, and that's what happened. He welcomed their voices as long as he was allowed to respond. When they wouldn't let him respond, he objected to their interruptions.

Sounds like you disagree with him. Why?

That's great and all that the mere thought of a political protest rising to the point of a speech being temporarily interrupted sends you into a raging tizzy, but just note that there is absolutely no specificity here. Protesting things has been standard democratic practice for centuries. What on earth does this have to do specifically with this one specific way that college kids are sometimes silly?

Just lol. Nobody here has disagreed with his platitude. We are just LOLing at you thinking that means you've won any of your loltastically bad points, such as the recent pearl clutching over people daring to protest something audibly. And thinking it is such a trump that you've added the "lol obama agrees with me guys!" into like half your posts ITT.

Forgive me if I'm confused and think you disagree with Obama. I'm trying to defend his arguments and you're referring to them as mere platitudes.

Where did I say protesting audibly was a problem? It's when you're drowning out others it's a problem. And I just said I don't think it's a big deal if there is actually a dialogue. When a dialogue is not what you're after, I disagree with that. Obama and Bill Clinton agree, and they've said as much. Do you disagree?

Oh well there is the problem. Let me fix your deep confusion (and please don't take this personally, we all know you were in a sick nearly comatose sleep deprived days long instareply state; nobody is going to be thinking straight through that). Nobody ITT that I saw at least is pushing back in any way at Obama's platitude that people shouldn't insulate themselves from different points of view. The entire focus is laughing at you for all the ludicrous extensions you have made beyond Obama's entirely reasonable comment.

Consider you are the one raving about the great problem that political protesters might dare interrupt a speaker and just how oh so wrong this. So we have no choice but to laugh at you for this, and laugh doubly hard when you just keep coming back to "Obama agrees with me guys!!!!!!"

FoldnRape's constant appeals to authority are fun

Why don't you do it, then? If other people just need Pinker's video to encourage themselves, and you already have watched the video, why aren't you already blowing people's hair back with open minded ace argumentation?

Well, I keep bringing Obama up because I respect and agree with him. Some of you seem to ardently disagree with me, yet you also claim to agree with him (platitudes notwithstanding). Maybe someone could bridge the gap and explain where you believe our opinions differ here.

DMW, dude, we all know that n-word story didn't actually happen to you because you didn't go to college, and let's just say I don't see you attending a lot of college graduations in your future.

So why do you care? Why can't you have the academics have their secular empirical colleges like they want, why do you need to constantly inject your politics into their lives?

I'll try to spell this out super clearly for you

Obama's single statement: everyone agrees
The wide range of bizarre and only tangentially related to Obama statments that Fold makes: not everyone agrees

Hence why "Obama agrees with me lol ur wrong" is so hilarious in every other post.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that neither chezlaw or FoldN have actually watched that speech, read the transcript, etc. FoldN found that quote in one of his right wing websites doing the "EVEN THE LIBERAL OBAMA" thing and he's just spamming it. It's possible he hasn't even read the quote itself.