Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread

12-20-2011 , 11:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraths Unanimous
I'm saying that the disgust I would feel if a foreign country was stationed in America is probably felt elsewhere about our soldiers based there.
Just a final tidbit before bed... you might not know that the German AF is stationed in New Mexico and Texas; Luftwaffe Tornados have been streaking across the blue skies of America for 15 years and nobody gives a damn (except the Alamogordo locals who've welcomed the increased business).

Last edited by ctyri; 12-20-2011 at 11:48 PM.
12-20-2011 , 11:44 PM
THE GERMANS ARE NOT KILLING AMERICANS CTYRI JUST LIKE YOU ARE NOT KILLING ENGLISH****INGMEN WITH BAD TEEF DO YOU SEE HOW WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS DUMB YET?
12-20-2011 , 11:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Nope, and Japan also pays us to be there ($2B USD in 2007)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Forces_Japan
That's definitely more support than I suspected. Still, things in Japan are rather chilly for our armed forces. Particularly right around the major bases, there were "no Navy" or "Japanese Only" signs all over the place the last time I was there.
12-20-2011 , 11:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
LOL. Wow that is bad. "The reality is that US troops overseas are the same as armed Chinese troops in Texas." Uh, no no no. As a US serviceman stationed overseas and welcomed overwhelmingly as a part of this community, I can safely say the situations aren't identical. Also, overseas troops generally don't act outside the law. And America isn't quite same security situation as say Afghanistan. But what the hell, why even bother nitpicking any of this, the point is IMAGINE IF CHINESE INFANTRY WERE RUNNING AROUND TEXAS WITH GUNS AND THE CONSTITUTION COULDNT STOP THEM! THATS AN IDENTICAL SITUATION! YIKES!
How can you not see the parallels? I recently returned from a tour in Afghanistan and LOL if you think soldiers aren't acting outside the law.

The point is we are there patrolling their streets, searching their villagers, raiding their homes and killing their citizens.

It's not even the soldier's fault. The soldiers are simply trying to ensure they're not the ones that get killed. And it can get to the point where every person of the invaded/occupied country is seen as a threat/enemy.

We are over their invading their culture and imposing our will on the Afghan people. That's pretty simple.
12-20-2011 , 11:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ludacris
How can you not see the parallels? I recently returned from a tour in Afghanistan and LOL if you think soldiers aren't acting outside the law.

The point is we are there patrolling their streets, searching their villagers, raiding their homes and killing their citizens.

It's not even the soldier's fault. The soldiers are simply trying to ensure they're not the ones that get killed. And it can get to the point where every person of the invaded/occupied country is seen as a threat/enemy.

We are over their invading their culture and imposing our will on the Afghan people. That's pretty simple.
umm this is pretty ridiculous. actually it's ****ing ludracris. he has been to england, he has seen the love foreigners have for americans. if the english love americans surely you are mistaken about the afghanis.
12-20-2011 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by will1530
Hahaha. Stop talking about things you don't understand. Your gross generalizations are rather pathetic.
If Ron-Paul-Supporting troops really believed that their military efforts were righteous and good, why would they be supporting someone who would bring them home immediately and only use them for self-defense? Obviously it's not a generalization. If you support Ron Paul and you're in the military, you don't believe in what you initially signed up for.

Edit: Well, it's not a gross generalization lol. It's still a generalization.
12-20-2011 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
THE GERMANS ARE NOT KILLING AMERICANS CTYRI JUST LIKE YOU ARE NOT KILLING ENGLISH****INGMEN WITH BAD TEEF DO YOU SEE HOW WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS DUMB YET?
Bitch, sit down.
12-20-2011 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
umm this is pretty ridiculous. actually it's ****ing ludracris. he has been to england, he has seen the love foreigners have for americans. if the english love americans surely you are mistaken about the afghanis.
Wow, you're an expert on my service record and know that in almost 18 years of commisioned service, I've only been to England because thats where I'm currently stationed. Never been assigned to Korea or Japan, nope. Never visited well over a dozen countries in Europe, Africa, and Mid East on official business. Well good on ya, General, you figured me out. Good night and farewell, off to throw some darts and stuff, as that's all I know...
12-20-2011 , 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
Just a final tidbit before bed... you might not know that the German AF is stationed in New Mexico and Texas; Luftwaffe Tornados have been streaking across the blue skies of America for 15 years and nobody gives a damn (except the Alamogordo locals who've welcomed the increased business).
Had no idea about this. Thanks for the info.
12-20-2011 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
Yeah, if you mean anything better than a Texan's embrace of Chinese infantrymen operating completely outside the law is "totally welcoming."



Sure, if "many of their own" means 19 individuals of 27 million people.



So they don't get to stay and operate with continued immunity once government effectively took over security. Hmmm, that doesn't sound at all like what the ad describes would be the case in Texas.

I'm in England, by the way. The people treat me like a Chinese tank driver driving through Austin. I travel all over the world, though, and everywhere I go people have that same reaction. But I'm sure your insights are more accurate here anyway and I'll defer to you for now.

Americans have a cultural imperative that they are always right, never commit aggression, and are in the world to right the world's wrongs.

The fact is that these imperial aggression engender enormous resentment, even among allies, even if these allies are superficially favorable towards us. It's pretty obvious that yes regardless of the improvement ( lol improvement) that the Iraqis faced after Gulf War II, they still faced a situation of foreign forces paroling their neighborhoods, setting up checkpoints and ignoring their laws. The impasse and the removal of US forces over their impunity to Iraqi laws can't be any more blatant than this. Imperialism has always been a cooperative endeavor, so it wouldn't be surprising that if Chinese troops were in Texas you would also find Texans who approved of their presence for whatever reason. So yes the examples are roughly synonymous.

Last edited by Huehuecoyotl; 12-21-2011 at 12:19 AM.
12-20-2011 , 11:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by will1530
That's definitely more support than I suspected. Still, things in Japan are rather chilly for our armed forces. Particularly right around the major bases, there were "no Navy" or "Japanese Only" signs all over the place the last time I was there.
Yeah, but don't you think you can find that sentiment in towns that surround military bases or even college towns. A bunch of drunk dudes hurts certain types of businesses. I think that is the sentiment much more than any sort of anti American imperialism.
12-20-2011 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
Wow, you're an expert on my service record and know that in almost 18 years of commisioned service, I've only been to England because thats where I'm currently stationed. Never been assigned to Korea or Japan, nope. Never visited well over a dozen countries in Europe, Africa, and Mid East on official business. Well good on ya, General, you figured me out. Good night and farewell, off to throw some darts and stuff, as that's all I know...
Your list of countries you've visited is impressive!!! I went to Canada once.

But yes, the fact that you visited the middle east on "official business" (in 1998 lol) definitely outweighs the massive insurgent movement in Afghanistan and Iraq. You are a master of mid east relations now! Just like I'm a master of Canadian politics (did you know they still support the Queen!!!! I have Canadian playing cards with her picture on them!
12-21-2011 , 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tzwien
If Ron-Paul-Supporting troops really believed that their military efforts were righteous and good, why would they be supporting someone who would bring them home immediately and only use them for self-defense? Obviously it's not a generalization. If you support Ron Paul and you're in the military, you don't believe in what you initially signed up for.

Edit: Well, it's not a gross generalization lol. It's still a generalization.
Perhaps they've simply looked at the budget and realized our current foreign adventures are unsustainable? It's perfectly possible to think military service is fine (aka believe in what you signed up for), and also believe that the money pit that is the military budget is a greater threat to the country than podunk Iran. You really should stop projecting your own motivations and beliefs on other people.
12-21-2011 , 12:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." HL Mencken
HL Mencken has like 2/3 of the greatest American quotes. The Ken Burns prohibition documentary quoted him liberally - and every one was pure gold.

A prohibitionist is the sort of man one couldn't care to drink with, even if he drank.
12-21-2011 , 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tzwien
Yeah, because they realize they made a horrible decision and don't want to continue being an evil force of the government. The troops who don't support Ron are sheep.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
I remembered why I don't post here anymore.
All time classic exchange there.

You could never sustain this pace and severity of libertarian-bashing on this forum - unless you're some kind of superhuman who thrives on attack by 1000 fuzzy logic sludge-balls at once. You may win the battle or even the day. But they will eventually wear you down... down... down...
12-21-2011 , 12:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
I'm sure some people find it offensive. I've seen it. But as offensive as we would find Russian or Chinese bases in Texas using indiscriminate force outside US law, well no. Not even anywhere remotely close. So far from close that any hint of comparison should be met with ridicule. This is what I mean by the simpleton version of black-and-white libertarianism that Paul and his cronies have been spreading that has no credibility, in my opinion. Absolute property rights and isolationism are not mantras for the complicated problems of the 21st century. The fact that other candidates don't have good solutions either doesn't mean Paul's simpleton worldview shouldn't be denounced.

"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." HL Mencken
In before brainwash insult.

I wonder why the people who have experienced these countries and their people find conflict with the "they hate us" crowd.
12-21-2011 , 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zygote
so you're trying to sell on the idea that its all cozy, warm and lovely and the US troops are totally welcomed? I mean the saudi's loved troops so much on their land that many of their own decided to come crash planes into buildings over here. I guess we dont get their idea of "welcoming" due to cultural differences? and certainly US troops weren't effectively kicked out of iraq because the iraqi government refused to give them their desired immunity? also the deaths to US troops must've just been complete mistakes as they meant to offer flowers instead of ieds.
I'm not sure what's more ******ed....you assuming 19 people speak for entire population or the 19 people who, in their mind, acted in the best interest of their country.
12-21-2011 , 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraths Unanimous
I mean I'm not saying that a majority of people in every country that the US has troops stationed in find it disgusting. I'm saying that the disgust I would feel if a foreign country was stationed in America is probably felt elsewhere about our soldiers based there. It doesn't seem to much of a jump does it?
Well if America had committed the Rape of Nanking or Holocaust, invaded dozens countries with a goal of world domination (and not invaded in the Iraq way where we try to set up a democracy and leave - invaded in the we're going to rape your women, murder millions of civilians, plunder your resources and subjugate your people for a long long time way) then maybe we would have to put up with some bases on our soil and not feel too butthurt about it.
12-21-2011 , 12:49 AM
Oh crap am I trolling the RP thread? I thought this was the newsletter thread for some reason. Sorry I will take my lumps and leave.
12-21-2011 , 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleeingFish
I'm not sure what's more ******ed....you assuming 19 people speak for entire population or the 19 people who, in their mind, acted in the best interest of their country.
Damn I wish I would have written this cause it is brilliant imo.
12-21-2011 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
So all Saudi's agreed with Bin Laden? Seems when people accuse all muslims of being terrorists they are (correctly) assumed to be racist. But I guess when you imply that all Saudi's are terrorists and correct it makes it ok.
FFS there is a poll (posted in LC thread) of the Iraqi people indicating that 42 percent of the people think they are worse off since the War, 30 percent think they are better off, and 24 percent think they are the same. A pretty damning indictment of our involvement. But how would that poll look in the Chinese in Texas simpleton, hyperbole scenario?
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
LOLZZZZZZZZZZZLZOZLZOLZLOLZLOZOLZ
HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA


i knew you'd come back with some **** like "oh and I'm in Germany but yeah it's just the same as Iraq, they love us as much as the Germans do."

hahahahahahhhhhhhhhhhh omggg ctyri where have you been dude we need more of your insight into the mind of the people of the Middle East and how much they love their fish and chips.
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
"Man, the people in England just love me...gotta be the same in Iraq, it's not like people in the same uniform as me in Iraq have killed hundreds and thousands of Iraqis."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraths Unanimous
ctyri, there are plenty of people who hate America outside of the United States that live in non Middle Eastern countries. These people I would assume also hate the idea of United States military troops in their country.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Americanism

There are some references in there to people hating us based on troop presence in their country. I also know a couple guys who were AF stationed in Japan who say they encounter some pretty strong American soldier hate.
First, I went to Iraq and Afghanistan from Ft. Bragg then Kuwait from Atlanta. Does that mitigate my foreign experience? dude being stationed in England does not preclude service in the middle east.


Second, I love the people using a small sample size of of new clips to determine how much "they hate us" when in reality its a very small but vocal minority or the problems in the middle east would be a helluva lot worse.


Third, I'd like cite for the poll figures someone listed above, I've seen a pew poll that conflicted with this data for both Iraq and Afghanistan.

No matter you view on the situations overseas, I wish people would stop pretending to know how the population in general views the US as its nowhere close from my vast experiences. Not that matters to any of you, you rather trust what ever pundit is filling you with the that ****, who probably never been to anywhere past Park Avenue.

Amazing how military members with first hand experience are discredited. Its one thing to think we are "brain washed" with political opinions but to suggest our experiences should be invalidated, seems a lapse in logic and reason.
12-21-2011 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctyri
I'm sure some people find it offensive. I've seen it. But as offensive as we would find Russian or Chinese bases in Texas using indiscriminate force outside US law, well no. Not even anywhere remotely close. So far from close that any hint of comparison should be met with ridicule. This is what I mean by the simpleton version of black-and-white libertarianism that Paul and his cronies have been spreading that has no credibility, in my opinion. Absolute property rights and isolationism are not mantras for the complicated problems of the 21st century. The fact that other candidates don't have good solutions either doesn't mean Paul's simpleton worldview shouldn't be denounced.

"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." HL Mencken
Why is it so hard to grasp that Ron Paul's foreign policy is not isolationism? Why is it necessary for us to have a military presence in a country for it not to be isolationism? Can't we just trade freely and have open tourism and travel and have a strong diplomatic and economic relationship with foreign nations?
12-21-2011 , 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
Your list of countries you've visited is impressive!!! I went to Canada once.

But yes, the fact that you visited the middle east on "official business" (in 1998 lol) definitely outweighs the massive insurgent movement in Afghanistan and Iraq. You are a master of mid east relations now! Just like I'm a master of Canadian politics (did you know they still support the Queen!!!! I have Canadian playing cards with her picture on them!

whats wrong with mine then? You seem to question his views based on experience.
12-21-2011 , 12:59 AM
Can you guys take this to the bombing brown people thread?
12-21-2011 , 01:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FleeingFish
Amazing how military members with first hand experience are discredited. Its one thing to think we are "brain washed" with political opinions but to suggest our experiences should be invalidated, seems a lapse in logic and reason.
There are numerous military members with first hand experience who have given the complete opposite first hand experience as yourself. You don't have to take my word for it, you can google it.

So now it's internet dude named FleeingFish saying this thing, versus, some other internet dude with similar qualifications saying another thing. Informative.

What's interesting is that Ron Paul got the most donations from people in the military in 2008. Maybe they just misunderstood him.

      
m