Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Rich (Now with the Upper Middle Class) Rich (Now with the Upper Middle Class)

02-17-2011 , 08:12 PM
It depends on perspective. I think $250k/year is rich. Heck $25k/year would be filthy rich by world standards.
02-17-2011 , 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flytrap
It depends on perspective. I think $250k/year is rich. Heck $25k/year would be filthy rich by world standards.
02-17-2011 , 08:45 PM
Okay, Campers, rise and shine, and don't forget your booties, 'cause it's cold outside!
02-18-2011 , 01:22 AM
I love how mikeinyonker morphs more and more into a talking point the more he posts.
02-18-2011 , 04:55 PM
In the midwest (where I live now), I think 250k is rich (although bottom-end, not wealthy as mentioned above). I'm not so sure about New York, San Francisco, Boston, DC, LA, etc, where the average new home costs 2 or 3 times more than here, and the cost of living in general is up to twice as much. .
02-18-2011 , 05:08 PM
Has this thread been killed with fire yet?
02-18-2011 , 05:11 PM
seriously who the **** deleted my funny insult, IT WAS FUNNY
02-20-2011 , 06:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Has this thread been killed with fire yet?
If you let a thread simmer, and the riffraff disperse, it often gets back on track and fosters productive, cogent debate.

Why are you the kind of mod here who so often enjoys throwing the baby out with the bathwater every time? Does it sprain your eyes, somehow?

There's far too much "silence that thread" sentiment around here. I'll surely say that.

How about gearing down and just deleting a few posts? Not the threads overall.

Stifling the whole thread because of a few tards really exposed the quality of forum moderation. Here, or anywhere.
06-01-2011 , 03:58 PM
Excuse the bump, but this article was pretty good. USA poor are richer than India's rich
06-01-2011 , 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thutter
Excuse the bump, but this article was pretty good. USA poor are richer than India's rich
Eh, that's not quite what it's saying.
06-01-2011 , 06:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathspazz
Eh, that's not quite what it's saying.
Not quite. There must be a very wide distribution of wealth in India's top 5% for that chart to be accurate.
06-01-2011 , 06:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mosdef
Not quite. There must be a very wide distribution of wealth in India's top 5% for that chart to be accurate.
Yeh. I mean, first of all, who uses ventiles?

Secondly, a closer inspection leads to the conclusion that, if you listed each person in each country from richest to poorest, the 285,000,000th person in the US has relatively the same income as the 58,000,000th person in India.

My God, somebody alert the press!
06-01-2011 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thutter
Excuse the bump, but this article was pretty good. USA poor are richer than India's rich
Lol
06-01-2011 , 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
Isnt New Jersey a fraction of the cost to live in and extremely easy to commute to NYC from? Plus i assume you get gardens there, hence the name Garden State.
Extremely easy to commute from is a bit of a stretch. The major transportation hubs are cheaper, but not really "fractions of the cost" to live in. Once you get away from those hubs, we're talking about adding 4 to 5 hours a week to the commute.

There is also value to a NYC address. I find it amusing and somewhat pretentious but there is value.

Probably the most important thing... when you work 60~100 hours a week, saving 5~10 hours from your commute by living pretty much next to where you work has tremendous utility.
06-01-2011 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathspazz
Yeh. I mean, first of all, who uses ventiles?

Secondly, a closer inspection leads to the conclusion that, if you listed each person in each country from richest to poorest, the 285,000,000th person in the US has relatively the same income as the 58,000,000th person in India.

My God, somebody alert the press!
Ummm....thats actually quite amazing if true, I'm not sure why you are so dismissive of that fact.
06-01-2011 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vhawk01
Ummm....thats actually quite amazing if true, I'm not sure why you are so dismissive of that fact.
If this amazes you, then I guess I don't know what to say.
06-02-2011 , 03:10 AM
Not to beat the dead horse, but this report is worth reading. It just quantifies what exactly middle class is in NYC and differences between NYC and the rest of the country.
http://nycfuture.org/content/article...article_type=0
06-03-2011 , 04:29 AM
$250k is rich I'm lolling hard that people think it isn't.
06-03-2011 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullanian
$250k is rich I'm lolling hard that people think it isn't.
This means that we're entitled to more of their money, amirite?
06-03-2011 , 02:27 PM
Semantics maybe... but 250k is well off, not rich.

With only 250k, you'll struggle to send two kids to private colleges without making significant personal sacrifices.

You can't even buy "luxury" cars without worrying about what you're giving up.

Also, someone making nearly guaranteed 250k with high level of job/income security is much better off than, say, a poker player making 250k... especially the life fish poker players.
06-03-2011 , 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by qdmcg
This means that we're entitled to more of their money, amirite?

It's not their money, it belongs to society. Society allowed them to grow up under the benevolent watchful eye and kept them from being enslaved by generational wealthy peoples. The right thinks the left is just looking for handouts. But someone like Bill Gates benefits massively from having his software running in public schools everywhere so he should pay more in taxes. Yeah that's right bitch, Gates owes the "looters" for his dominant position. Society is allowing him access to lifetime "users" of his product by indoctrinating children to use it. Give to Obama what is Obama's.
06-03-2011 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
It's not their money, it belongs to society. Society allowed them to [diatribe ensues] ...
Who is this society person? I want to see society's birth certificate.
06-03-2011 , 04:37 PM
Get this through your head you Libertarian sociopath. No one anywhere ever accomplished anything on their own due to some superior intellect or work ethic.Every single great accomplishment or accumalation of wealth was acheived by standing on the shoulder's of the previous generation's works.

The tycoon owes his position to the collective aggregate production and innovation of all the people that came before him. The tycoon owes all.
06-03-2011 , 04:45 PM
I'm really happy for your location because I always want to quote you but then I read it.
06-03-2011 , 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
Get this through your head you Libertarian sociopath. No one anywhere ever accomplished anything on their own due to some superior intellect or work ethic.Every single great accomplishment or accumalation of wealth was acheived by standing on the shoulder's of the previous generation's works.

The tycoon owes his position to the collective aggregate production and innovation of all the people that came before him. The tycoon owes all.
the point still remains the same. there is no entity "society". there is only you, I and all the rest. scapegoating people who don't believe in your wholistic idiocy doesn't butress your point one iota.

      
m